Xiao X, Chu B, Zhang Z. Quality Quantification and Control via Novel Self-Growing Process-Quality Model of Parts Fabricated by LPBF Process.
MATERIALS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022;
15:8520. [PMID:
36500016 PMCID:
PMC9736372 DOI:
10.3390/ma15238520]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 11/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) presents a more extensive allowable design complexity and manufacturability compared with the traditional manufacturing processes by depositing materials in a layer-wised manner. However, the process variability in the LPBF process induces quality uncertainty and inconsistency. Specifically, the mechanical properties, e.g., tensile strength, are hard to be predicted and controlled in the LPBF process. Much research has recently been reported exploring the qualitative influence of single/two process parameters on tensile strength. In fact, mechanical properties are comprehensively affected by multiple correlated process parameters with unclear and complex interactions. Thus, the study on the quantitative process-quality model of the metal LPBF process is urgently needed to provide an enough-strength component via the metal LPBF process. Recent progress in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) provides new insight into quality prediction in terms of computational accuracy and speed. However, the predictive model quality through the traditional AL/ML is heavily determined by the training data size, and the experimental analysis can be expansive on LPBF. This paper explores the comprehensive effect of the tensile strength of 316L stainless-steel parts on LPBF and proposes a valid quantitative predictive model through a novel self-growing machine-learning framework. The self-growing framework can autonomously expand and classify the growing dataset to provide a high-accuracy prediction with fewer input data. To verify this predictive model of tensile strength, specimens manufactured by the LPBF process with different group process parameters (laser power, scanning speed, and hatch spacing) are collected. The experimental results validate the predicted tensile strengths within a less than 3% deviation.
Collapse