1
|
Lu P, Xu Z, Tian Y, Yang R, Hu K, Li H, Yin Y, Chen X. Effect of Initial Surface Scratches on the Cavitation Erosion Behavior of 316L Stainless Steel Substrates and 316L Stainless Steel Coatings. MATERIALS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 16:1392. [PMID: 36837022 PMCID: PMC9960317 DOI: 10.3390/ma16041392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Rough surfaces have been widely considered as negative factors affecting cavitation erosion resistance. However, this study presented the opposite result. Here, 316L stainless steel substrates and the arc-sprayed 316L stainless steel coatings were subjected to a specific grinding process that introduced scratches on the surfaces. The surface hardness values of these ground specimens were measured to evaluate the influence of the grinding-induced strain hardening. The cavitation erosion performance of the specimens was evaluated. The results showed that rough surfaces with scratches could enhance the cavitation erosion resistance, particularly at the early stage of cavitation erosion. The scratches had a greater effect on the cavitation erosion resistance of the coatings than on the substrates. Moreover, rough surfaces with initial surface scratches could extend the incubation period of the 316L stainless steel substrates due to the inhibition of the plastic deformation. The SEM observation showed that the scratch structure of the coating surface inhibited the growth of cracks and the propagation of cavitation pits. This study could also serve as a reference for investigating the cavitation erosion behaviors of materials with a particular surface feature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pengfei Lu
- Key Laboratory of Impact and Safety Engineering (Ministry of Education), School of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
- Zhejiang-Japan Joint Laboratory for Antibacterial and Antifouling Technology, Zhejiang Engineering Research Center for Biomedical Materials, Cixi Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, China
| | - Ziqi Xu
- Zhejiang-Japan Joint Laboratory for Antibacterial and Antifouling Technology, Zhejiang Engineering Research Center for Biomedical Materials, Cixi Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, China
- Faculty of Materials Metallurgy and Chemistry, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China
| | - Ye Tian
- Zhejiang-Japan Joint Laboratory for Antibacterial and Antifouling Technology, Zhejiang Engineering Research Center for Biomedical Materials, Cixi Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, China
| | - Rui Yang
- Zhejiang-Japan Joint Laboratory for Antibacterial and Antifouling Technology, Zhejiang Engineering Research Center for Biomedical Materials, Cixi Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, China
| | - Kaixin Hu
- Key Laboratory of Impact and Safety Engineering (Ministry of Education), School of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
| | - Hua Li
- Zhejiang-Japan Joint Laboratory for Antibacterial and Antifouling Technology, Zhejiang Engineering Research Center for Biomedical Materials, Cixi Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, China
| | - Yanhong Yin
- Faculty of Materials Metallurgy and Chemistry, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou 341000, China
- Chongyi Zhangyuan Tungsten Co., Ltd., Ganzhou 341000, China
| | - Xiuyong Chen
- Zhejiang-Japan Joint Laboratory for Antibacterial and Antifouling Technology, Zhejiang Engineering Research Center for Biomedical Materials, Cixi Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo 315201, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Are MCDA Methods Benchmarkable? A Comparative Study of TOPSIS, VIKOR, COPRAS, and PROMETHEE II Methods. Symmetry (Basel) 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/sym12091549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 137] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Multi-Criteria Decision-Analysis (MCDA) methods are successfully applied in different fields and disciplines. However, in many studies, the problem of selecting the proper methods and parameters for the decision problems is raised. The paper undertakes an attempt to benchmark selected Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods. To achieve that, a set of feasible MCDA methods was identified. Based on reference literature guidelines, a simulation experiment was planned. The formal foundations of the authors’ approach provide a reference set of MCDA methods ( Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR), Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS), and PROMETHEE II: Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment of Evaluations) along with their similarity coefficients (Spearman correlation coefficients and WS coefficient). This allowed the generation of a set of models differentiated by the number of attributes and decision variants, as well as similarity research for the obtained rankings sets. As the authors aim to build a complex benchmarking model, additional dimensions were taken into account during the simulation experiments. The aspects of the performed analysis and benchmarking methods include various weighing methods (results obtained using entropy and standard deviation methods) and varied techniques of normalization of MCDA model input data. Comparative analyses showed the detailed influence of values of particular parameters on the final form and a similarity of the final rankings obtained by different MCDA methods.
Collapse
|
3
|
Special Issue: Advanced Coatings for Corrosion Protection. MATERIALS 2020; 13:ma13153401. [PMID: 32752160 PMCID: PMC7435683 DOI: 10.3390/ma13153401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Corrosion is an important issue in many industrial fields. Among others, coatings are by far the most important technology for corrosion protection of metallic surfaces. The special issue “Advanced Coatings for Corrosion Protection” has been launched as a means to present recent developments on any type of advanced coatings for corrosion protection. Fifteen contributions have been collected on metallic, inorganic, polymeric and nanoparticle enhanced coatings providing corrosion protection as well as partly other functionalities.
Collapse
|