Surface Comparison of Three Different Commercial Custom-Made Titanium Meshes Produced by SLM for Dental Applications

3D printing for bone regeneration: challenges and opportunities for achieving predictability

3D printing offers attractive opportunities for large-volume bone regeneration in the oro-dental and craniofacial regions. This is enabled by the development of CAD-CAM technologies that support the design and manufacturing of anatomically accurate meshes and scaffolds. This review describes the main 3D-printing technologies utilized for the fabrication of these patient-matched devices, and reports on their pre-clinical and clinical performance including the occurrence of complications for vertical bone augmentation and craniofacial applications. Furthermore, the regulatory pathway for approval of these devices is discussed, highlighting the main hurdles and obstacles. Finally, the review elaborates on a variety of strategies for increasing bone regeneration capacity and explores the future of 4D bioprinting and biodegradable metal 3D printing.

Optimization of Titanium Dental Mesh Surfaces for Biological Sealing and Prevention of Bacterial Colonization

Titanium dental meshes have a wide application in order to ensure the retention of calcium phosphate-based biomaterials to regenerate bone tissue. These meshes are temporary and must grow a soft tissue to prevent bacterial colonization and provide stability. In this work, we aimed to optimize the roughness of the meshes to obtain a good biological seal while maintaining a behavior that did not favor bacterial colonization. To this end, six types of surfaces were studied: machined as a control, polished, sandblasted with three different alumina sizes and sintered. The roughness, contact angles and biological behavior of the samples using fibroblast cultures at 7, 24 and 72 h were determined as well as cytotoxicity studies. Cultures of two very common bacterial strains in the oral cavity were also carried out: Streptococcus sanguinis and Lactobacillus salivarius. The results showed that the samples treated with alumina particles by sandblasting at 200 micrometers were the ones that performed best with fibroblasts and also with the number of bacterial colonies in both strains. According to the results, we see in this treatment a candidate for the surface treatment of dental meshes with an excellent performance.

Relevant Aspects of Piranha Passivation in Ti6Al4V Alloy Dental Meshes

Passivation of titanium alloy dental meshes cleans their surface and forms a thin layer of protective oxide (TiO2) on the surface of the material to improve resistance to corrosion and prevent release of ions to the physiological environment. The most common chemical agent for the passivation process of titanium meshes is hydrochloric acid (HCl). In this work, we introduce the use of Piranha solution (H2SO4 and H2O2) as a passivating and bactericidal agent for metallic dental meshes. Meshes of grade 5 titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) were tested after different treatments: as-received control (Ctr), passivated by HCl, and passivated by Piranha solution. Physical-chemical characterization of all treated surfaces was carried out by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), confocal microscopy and sessile drop goniometry to assess meshes’ topography, elemental composition, roughness, wettability and surface free energy, that is, relevant properties with potential effects for the biological response of the material. Moreover, open circuit potential and potentiodynamic tests were carried out to evaluate the corrosion behavior of the differently-treated meshes under physiological conditions. Ion release tests were conducted using Inductively Coupled Plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The antibacterial activity by prevention of bacterial adhesion tests on the meshes was performed for two different bacterial strains, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Gram-) and Streptococcus sanguinis (Gram+). Additionally, a bacterial viability study was performed with the LIVE/DEAD test. We complemented the antibacterial study by counting cells attached to the surface of the meshes visualized by SEM. Our results showed that the passivation of titanium meshes with Piranha solution improved their hydrophilicity and conferred a notably higher bactericidal activity in comparison with the meshes passivated with HCl. This unique response can be attributed to differences in the obtained nanotextures of the TiO2 layer. However, Piranha solution treatment decreased electrochemical stability and increased ion release as a result of the porous coating formed on the treated surfaces, which can compromise their corrosion resistance. Framed by the limitations of this work, we conclude that using Piranha solution is a viable alternative method for passivating titanium dental meshes with beneficial antibacterial properties that merits further validation for its translation as a treatment applied to clinically-used meshes.

Vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation using customized CAD/CAM titanium mesh with versus without resorbable membranes. A randomized clinical trial

Objectives

The aim was to evaluate the role of resorbable membranes applied over customized titanium meshes related to soft tissue healing and bone regeneration after vertical/horizontal bone augmentation.

Materials and Methods

Thirty patients with partial edentulism of the maxilla/mandible, with vertical/horizontal reabsorption of the alveolar bone, and needing implant‐supported restorations, were randomly divided into two groups: Group A was treated using only custom‐made meshes (Mesh‐) and Group B using custom‐made meshes with cross‐linked collagen membranes (Mesh+). Data collection included surgical/technical and healing complications, “pseudo‐periosteum” thickness, bone density, planned bone volume (PBV), regenerated bone volume (RBV), regeneration rate (RR), vertical bone gain (VBG), and implant survival in regenerated areas. Statistical analysis was performed between the two study groups using a significance level of α = .05.

Results

Regarding the healing complications, the noninferiority analysis proved to be inconclusive, despite the better results of group Mesh+ (13%) compared to group Mesh‐ (33%): estimated value −1.13 CI‐95% from −0.44 to 0.17. Superiority approach confirmed the absence of significant differences (p = .39). RBV was 803.27 mm³ and 843.13 mm³, respectively, and higher RR was observed in group Mesh+ (82.3%) compared to Mesh‐ (74.3%), although this value did not reach a statistical significance (p = .44). All 30 patients completed the study, receiving 71 implants; 68 out of them were clinically stable and in function.

Conclusion

The results showed that customized meshes alone do not appear to be inferior to customized meshes covered by cross‐linked collagen membranes in terms of healing complication rates and regeneration rates, although superior results were observed in group Mesh+compared to group Mesh‐ for all variables.

Customized-3D zirconia barriers for guided bone regeneration (GBR): clinical and histological findings from a proof-of-concept case series

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this case series was to evaluate, clinically and histologically, customized-3D zirconia barriers manufactured for guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedures.

METHODS

Seven healthy consecutive patients with severe bone atrophy (two of them with a bilateral atrophy) were selected for a GBR procedure with a zirconia barrier. In a 3D software (DentalCad, Exocad GmbH, Germany), a virtual bone graft was designed and a shell was designed covering the graft; a standard tessellation language (.STL) file was obtained and milled (M1, Zirkonzahn, Italy) using a 1200 MPa zirconia (Prettau, Zirkonzahn, Italy). Nine GBR surgeries (8 upper-posterior jaw, 1 lower-posterior jaw) were performed using autogenous bone chips mixed with xenograft (SmartBone, IBI-SA, Switzerland / BioOss, Geistlich, Switzerland) covered with a zirconia barrier, fixed by means of screws. After healing, implant sites were prepared with a trephine bur, collecting a bone biopsy, and dental implants were inserted (Neodent, Straumann Group, Switzerland). Specimens were histologically analyzed.

RESULTS

Eight successful surgeries were recorded; one zirconia barrier got exposed after one month of healing but no signs of infection were present till the barrier was removed. In all cases it was possible to insert implants with no additional bone augmentation procedures. Histological evaluations showed the presence of intense deposition of new bone.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of the present case series, the tested customized-3D zirconia barriers confirmed good clinical and histological performances, and, even in case of premature exposure, did not show signs of infection. Preliminary results suggest they are effective for GBR procedures. Further research is necessary with a larger sample size.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The presented barriers could be a viable alternative to titanium-reinforced polytetrafluoroethylene membranes and customized meshes.

Mechanical Properties and Corrosion Resistance of TiAl6V4 Alloy Produced with SLM Technique and Used for Customized Mesh in Bone Augmentations

Bone augmentation procedures represent a real clinical challenge. One option is the use of titanium meshes. Additive manufacturing techniques can provide custom-made devices in titanium alloy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the material used, which can influence the outcomes of the bone augmentation procedure. Specific test samples were obtained from two different manufacturers with two different shapes: surfaces without perforations and with calibrated perforations. Three-point bending tests were run as well as internal friction tests to verify the Young’s modulus. Test samples were placed in two different buffered solutions and analyzed with optical microscopy. A further SEM analysis was done to observe any microstructural modification. Three-point flexural tests were conducted on 12 specimens. Initial bending was observed at lower applied stresses for the perforated samples (503 MPa) compared to non-perforated ones (900 MPa); the ultimate flexural strength was registered at 513 MPa and 1145 MPa for perforated and non-perforated samples, respectively. Both microscopic analyses (optical and SEM) showed no significant alterations. Conclusions: A normal masticatory load cannot modify the device. Chemical action in the case of exposure does not create macroscopic and microscopic alterations of the surface.

Effect of Exposure Rates with Customized versus Conventional Titanium Mesh on Guided Bone Regeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Titanium mesh exposure is the main complication of bone regeneration. In this study, a meta-analysis and performed to clarify the effect of customized titanium mesh versus conventional titanium mesh complications and the time of mesh exposure on edentulous alveolar ridge GBR. Databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register Controlled Trials, were searched by two independent reviewers to retrieve articles published from January 2010 to March 2020, regarding the incidence of complications after GBR surgery, with language limited to English articles. A total of 705 articles were found, and 9 articles were quantitatively analyzed. A funnel plot was made for 10 comprehensive datasets. The combined value of the total exposure rate of titanium mesh was 0.44 (44%, 95% CI=0.30~0.58). The results of subgroup analysis showed that the combined value of the customized titanium mesh exposure rate was 0.31 (31%, 95% CI=0.15~0.51), and the combined value of the conventional titanium mesh exposure rate was 0.51 (51%, 95% CI=0.33~0.69). Based on the findings of the present study, the exposure rate of customized titanium mesh is lower than that of conventional titanium mesh. The design of 3D printing customized titanium mesh avoids nerves and blood vessels, which is of great significance to improve the accurate reconstruction of GBR and provides enough space for implantation and reducing the exposure rate. Soft tissue management (i.e., technical sensitivity) is also an important factor to avoid soft tissue fractures.

Surface Quality of Metal Parts Produced by Laser Powder Bed Fusion: Ion Polishing in Gas-Discharge Plasma Proposal

Additive manufacturing has evolved over the past decades into a technology that provides freedom of design through the ability to produce complex-shaped solid structures, reducing the operational time and material volumes in manufacturing significantly. However, the surface of parts manufactured by the additive method remains now extremely rough. The current trend of expanding the industrial application of additive manufacturing is researching surface roughness and finishing. Moreover, the limited choice of materials suitable for additive manufacturing does not satisfy the diverse design requirements, necessitating additional coatings deposition. Requirements for surface treatment and coating deposition technology depend on the intended use of the parts, their material, and technology. In most cases, they cannot be determined based on existing knowledge and experience. It determines the scientific relevance of the analytical research and development of scientific and technological principles of finishing parts obtained by laser additive manufacturing and functional coating deposition. There is a scientific novelty of analytical research that proposes gas-discharge plasma processing for finishing laser additive manufactured parts and technological principles development including three processing stages—explosive ablation, polishing with a concentrated beam of fast neutral argon atoms, and coating deposition—for the first time.

Influence of Postprocessing on Wear Resistance of Aerospace Steel Parts Produced by Laser Powder Bed Fusion

The paper is devoted to the research of the effect of ultrasonic postprocessing—specifically, the effects of ultrasonic cavitation-abrasive finishing, ultrasonic plastic deformation, and vibration tumbling on surface quality, wear resistance, and the ability of real aircraft parts with complex geometries and with sizes less than and more than 100 mm to work in exploitation conditions. The parts were produced by laser powder bed fusion from two types of anticorrosion steels of austenitic and martensitic grades—20Kh13 (DIN 1.4021, X20Cr13, AISI 420) and 12Kh18N9T (DIN 1.4541, X10CrNiTi18-10, AISI 321). The finishing technologies based on mechanical action—plastic deformation, abrasive wear, and complex mechanolysis showed an effect on reducing the submicron surface roughness, removing the trapped powder granules from the manufactured functional surfaces and their wear resistance. The tests were completed by proving resistance of the produced parts to exploitation conditions—vibration fatigue and corrosion in salt fog. The roughness arithmetic mean deviation Ra was improved by 50–52% after cavitation-abrasive finishing, by 28–30% after ultrasonic plastic deformation, and by 65–70% after vibratory tumbling. The effect on wear resistance is correlated with the improved roughness. The effect of used techniques on resistance to abrasive wear was explained and grounded.