Shaping Ability and Debris Extrusion of New Rotary Nickel-Titanium Root Canal Instruments

Scanning Electron Microscopic Analysis of Deformation of TruNatomy File Systems: An Ex-vivo Study

Aim The aim of the study was to assess the instrument deformation following the usage of the TruNatomy (Dentsply Sirona, USA) file system in extracted premolars using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Materials and Methods For the present study, 84 extracted mandibular bicuspids were selected. The teeth were divided into two groups: Group 1, TruNatomy (n=42), and Group 2, Hero Shaper (Micro Mega, France) (n=42). The samples were shaped with 0.03 taper to size 36 with TruNatomy instruments and 0.04 taper to size 30 with Hero Shaper instruments. 5 ml of 5.25% Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl) and 2 ml of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) were used for the final irrigation of root canals. The master apical file was used to instrument seven teeth samples for assessing the safety of the instruments after multiple uses and autoclaving. So, a total of six files per group was used for the analysis of any distortions, cracks or micro-fractures after instrumentation of 42 teeth, at the tip (D0) and 5 mm from the tip (D5) of the rotary file under SEM at 500x magnification. Statistical analysis To determine the significance between the groups, the Mann-Whitney U-test was applied. Results The mean surface wear of the instruments, at the tip (D0) in Group 1 was 1.2857 and in Group 2 was 1.4762. The mean spiral distortion of the instruments, at the tip (D0) in Group 1 was 1.1905 and in Group 2 was 1.4286. A statistically significant difference (P<0.05) was observed between the groups for surface wear and spiral distortion at the tip of the file (D0). There was no significant difference between groups for surface wear and spiral distortion values of the instruments at 5 mm from the tip (D5) (P>0.05). Conclusion The instrument distortion of the rotary file systems analysed was minimal following the biomechanical preparation of seven mandibular bicuspids without root curvature, using a single file. Therefore, both rotary file systems can be considered safe.

Comparative evaluation of canal transportation and canal centering ability in oval canals with newer nickel-titanium rotary single file systems - A cone-beam computed tomography study

Context

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the centering ability and canal transportation of TruNatomy, OneCurve, and Jizai file systems to assess their performance in oval-shaped canals using cone-beam computed tomography imaging.

Materials and Methods

Forty-two fully formed single-rooted mandibular premolars were selected with a buccolingual canal size 2-2.5 times the mesiodistal size at 5 mm from the apex, with 0°-10° canal curvature with a 5-6 mm radius, at 5 mm from the apex. The teeth were divided into three groups (n = 14) and prepared with TruNatomy, OneCurve, and Jizai files based on the manufacturer's instructions. Cone-beam computed tomographic images were taken before and after instrumentation. The canal transportation and centering ability was calculated at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the apex in both mesiodistal and buccolingual directions.

Statistical Analysis

Intergroup comparison was done using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Intragroup comparison was done using Freidman test. A comparison of categorical variables was done using the Chi-square test.

Results

The results obtained did not present any statistically significant difference between the three groups, with TruNatomy and OneCurve showing relatively lesser canal transportation and better centering ratio when compared to the Jizai file system.

Conclusions

It can, therefore, be concluded that all three systems used in the study are capable of safely preparing root canals with minimal errors.

Impact of Contracted Endodontic Access Cavity on Shaping Ability of Hyflex Electrical Discharge Machining Single File Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: An Ex Vivo Study

AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the effect of different access cavity designs, using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), on root canal transportation, and centralization performed on two rooted maxillary premolars. METHODS: Twenty maxillary premolars were randomly divided into two groups. In Group 1, traditional endodontic cavities (TECs) were prepared. In Group 2, contracted endodontic cavities (CECs) were prepared. Mechanical preparation was done by HyFlex electrical discharge machining (EDM) single file in both groups. CBCT imaging was performed pre- and post-root canal preparation for calculations of root canal transportation and centering ability. RESULTS: Data were analyzed using Mann–Whitney U test and Kruskal–Wallis test. For transportation, teeth with CECs showed the statistically significantly highest median amount of transportation, while as for centering ability, results showed no significant difference between both groups. CONCLUSION: Under the conditions of this study, HyFlex EDM prepared canals with different access cavity designs without significant shaping errors. TEC showed less transportation than CEC, while both TEC and CEC had no effect on the file centering ability.