Comparing the Fracture Resistance and Modes of Failure in Different Types of CAD/CAM Zirconia Abutments with Internal Hexagonal Implants: An In Vitro Study

Comparison of De-Torque and Failure Load Evaluation of Selective-Laser-Sintered CoCr, CAD-CAM ZrO, and Machined Implant Abutment/Restoration

AIM

This study aimed to compare the torque loss, fracture load, compressive strength, and failure types of selective-laser-sintered cobalt chromium (SLM-Co-Cr), computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing zirconium oxide (CAD-CAM-ZrO), and machined titanium (Ti) implant abutments.

METHODS

Thirty endosseous dental implants were vertically embedded with machined Ti (control group), CAD-CAM-ZrO, and SLM-Co-Cr abutments. Abutment fabrication involved CAD-CAM milling and SLM technology. The de-torque assessment included preload reverse torque values (RTVs), cyclic loading, and post-RTVs using a customized protocol. Fracture load assessment employed ISO-14801 standards, and statistical analysis was conducted using ANOVA and Tukey Post hoc tests (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

In pre-load RTVs, SLM-Co-Cr showed the lowest mean torque loss (24.30 ± 2.13), followed by machined Ti (27.33 ± 2.74) and CAD-CAM-ZrO (22.07 ± 2.20). Post-load RTVs decreased for all groups. Fracture load and compressive strength were highest for SLM-Co-Cr, with significant differences among groups (p < 0.001). Fracture types included abutment failures in SLM-Co-Cr and machined Ti, while CAD-CAM-ZrO exhibited crown separation with deformation.

CONCLUSION

SLM-Co-Cr-fabricated implant abutments exhibited superior stability and resistance to rotational forces, higher fracture loads, and greater compressive strength compared to CAD-CAM-ZrO and machined Ti.

Clinical decision-making of anterior implant abutment

Abutment is an important component serving as a connecting link between the implant and the implant-supported prosthesis. In accordance with mechanical, biological, and other conventional norms, it can compensate the deviation between the implant and the prosthesis, which plays a significant role in maintaining the health of peri-implant tissue and the longevity, stability, and effectivity of prosthesis. However, choosing an anterior implant abutment correctly and conveniently is challenging, given the great variety of anterior abutment in clinical practice. Through virtual implant design, the correct implant site was compared and selected, and the supra-target prosthesis was coordinated before and after the operation. The implant level vertical of height of target restoration space (I) was measured to predict the availability and the retentive method of the implant restoration. After implantation, the primary selection of abutment type was selected according to the implant system (S), screw access position, and retentive method of the prosthesis. The final selection of abutment is accomplished by combining the measured values of peri-implant soft tissue thickness (T), gingival height (GH), and long axis of implant (L). Furthermore, the concepts and the classified applications of custom abutment were discussed in detail in this paper. The plan's main control variables L, I, GH, T, and S compose the words Lights, so this plan can be abbreviated as the anterior abutment decision tree. The decision tree has good decision-making efficiency and high clinical accessibility.

Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Implant-Supported 3Y-TZP-Zirconia Cantilevers: An In Vitro Study

(1) Introduction: Implant-supported fixed complete dentures are mostly composed of cantilevers. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the fracture resistance of zirconia (Prettau®, second generation, or Ice Zirkon Translucent, first generation) with cantilever lengths of 6 and 10 mm, and zirconia’s fracture resistance in relation to an average bite force of 250 N. (2) Materials and methods: Forty structures were created in CAD/CAM and divided into four groups: group A (6 mm cantilever in IZT), group B (10 mm cantilever in IZT), group C (6 mm cantilever in Pz), and group D (10 mm cantilever in pz). The study consisted of a traditional “load-to-failure” test. (3) Results: A statistically significant result was found for the effect of cantilever length, t(38) = 16.23 (p < 0.001), with this having a large effect size, d = 4.68. The 6 mm cantilever length (M = 442.30, sd = 47.49) was associated with a higher mean force at break than the 10 mm length (M = 215.18, sd = 40.74). No significant effect was found for the type of zirconia: t(38) = 0.31 (p = 0.757), and d = 0.10. (4) Conclusions: All the components with cantilever lengths of 6 mm broke under forces higher than 250 N. Cantilevers larger than 10 mm should be avoided.

Effect of Marginal Bone Integrity and Aftermarket Abutment Screws on Dental Implant Systems-A Preliminary Study with Finite Element Method

Bone resorption around implants is quite common, and the maturity and popularization of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology have made the use of aftermarket abutment screws more widespread. This study aimed to explore the biomechanical influence of these two common factors on the internal stress of an implant system using three-dimensional finite element analysis (3D FEA). The FEA results indicated that under the same loading conditions, the use of an aftermarket screw had the greatest impact on the screw itself among the three components of the implant system, while the maximum stress increased by 6.3% and 10.5% in the bone integrity and bone loss models, respectively. Moreover, the marginal bone loss models had the greatest impact on the implant fixture, with a maximum stress increase of 51.8% on average. Evidently, the influence of bone loss might be far greater than that of the aftermarket screw; however, any factor could be enough to cause clinical failure. Therefore, we should pay more attention to the maintenance of the long-term peri-implant marginal bone integrity.

Effects of Marginal Bone Loss Progression on Stress Distribution in Different Implant-Abutment Connections and Abutment Materials: A 3D Finite Element Analysis Study

Peri-implantitis is a common implant-supported prosthesis complication, and marginal bone loss affects the stress distribution in implant systems. This three-dimensional finite element analysis study investigated how bone loss affects the implant assembly; in particular, models including two implant systems with different connection systems (external or internal hexagon), abutment materials (titanium or zirconia), and bone loss levels (0, 1.5, 3, or 5 mm) were created. We observed that the maximum von Mises stress distinctly increased in the groups with bone loss over 1.5 mm compared to the group without bone loss, regardless of the connection system or abutment material used. Moreover, the screw stress patterns with bone loss progression were determined more by the connection systems than by the abutment materials, and the magnitude of the stress on the fixture was affected by the connection systems with a similar pattern. The highest stress on the screw with the external hexagon connection system increased over 25% when bone loss increased from 3 to 5 mm, exceeding the yield strength of the titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) when 5 mm bone loss exists; clinically, this situation may result in screw loosening or fracture. The highest stress on the fixture, exceeding the yield strength of pure titanium, was noted with the internal hexagon connection system and 1.5 mm bone loss. Titanium and zirconia abutments-both of which are clinically durable-presented similar screw and fixture stress patterns. Therefore, clinicians should pay more attention to maintaining the peri-implant bone to achieve the long-term stability of the implant-supported prosthesis.

CAD/CAM Abutments versus Stock Abutments: An Update Review

With the evolution of CAD/CAM technology, custom titanium and/or zirconia abutments are increasingly being used, leading to several comparisons in the literature, both mechanical and aesthetic, to evaluate performance differences between these two types of abutments. Therefore, the aim of this comprehensive review is to present the most recent data on the latest comparisons between CAD/CAM and stock abutment applications. The PICO model was used to perform this review, through a literature search of the PubMed (MEDLINE) and Scopus electronic databases. CAD/CAM abutments allow individualization of abutment parameters with respect to soft tissue, allow increased fracture toughness, predict the failure mode, show no change in the fracture toughness over time, reduce the prosthetic steps, and reduce the functional implant prosthesis score and pain perceived by patients in the early stages. The advantages associated with the use of stock abutments mainly concern the risk of corrosion, time spent, cost, and fit, evaluated in vitro, in the implant–abutment connection. Equal conditions are present regarding the mechanical characteristics during dynamic cycles, screw loss, radiographic fit, and degree of micromotion. Further randomized controlled clinical trials should be conducted to evaluate the advantages reported to date, following in vitro studies about titanium and/or zirconia stock abutments.