Exertional Heat Illness Preparedness Strategies: Environmental Monitoring Policies in United States High Schools

The initial visibility of updated recommendations on preseason heat safety in high school athletics among United States athletic trainers

Updated recommendations on preseason heat safety in high school (HS) athletics ("2021 Consensus Statements") were published in April 2021. This cross-sectional survey study explored the initial roll-out of the 2021 Consensus Statements, including their visibility among United States HS athletic trainers (ATs) and perceived levels of confidence in implementing them. Recruitment occurred first, from a random selection of ATs from the Board of Certification, Inc., and second, an open invitation via social media. An online cross-sectional questionnaire had participating ATs note whether they had seen the 2021 Consensus Statements. If yes, ATs reported their perceived level of confidence in implementing them (5-point-ordinal scale from "not at all confident" to "very confident); if no, ATs disclosed (open-ended) why they had not yet seen them. Descriptive statistics were calculated for quantitative variables; template analysis identified codes related to visibility of and confidence in implementing 2021 Consensus Statements. Nearly half (45.7%) of 116 responding HS ATs reported having seen at least one 2021 Consensus Statements; 23.3% had reviewed all three. Common reasons among the 63 that had not seen them included: not aware they were published (n = 22), have yet to read them (n = 19), and believed they could not access the journal (n = 10). Of the 53 ATs having seen at least one of the 2021 Consensus Statements, 67.9% (n = 36) were very/fairly confident in implementing them at their HS. Reasons for confidence included their schools ensuring up-to-date EHI prevention and management practices (n = 18) and athletics constituent support (n = 8). This exploratory study observed proportions of surveyed HS ATs that had not seen the 2021 Consensus Statements and were not confident in implementing them. Findings highlight the need to continue improving messaging about access to best-practice recommendations. Further, continued efforts inclusive of active and passive dissemination strategies across all athletics constituents are needed to aid proper implementation.

Variations of wet-bulb globe temperature across high school athletics in South Carolina

The purpose was to describe wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) throughout a high school fall athletic season (August to November) after a state-wide mandate requiring schools to use a WBGT-guided activity modification table with categories (AMTC). A cross-sectional research design utilized 30 South Carolina high schools. The independent variables were region (upstate, midlands, and coastal), sport (football, tennis, cross-country), month, start times (7-10 am, 10 am-3 pm, 3-6 pm, and 6-9 pm), and event type (practice, competition). Dependent variables were event frequency, average WBGT, and AMTC. Practice WBGT was 78.7 ± 8.2 °F (range: 34.7 to 99.0 °F). A significant difference for WBGT across month (F₆, 904.7 = 385.07, P < 0.001) existed, with early September hotter than all other months (84.8 °F ± 3.8, P < 0.001). Every month had practices in each AMTC, until early November. Most events (64.6%, n = 1986) did not change AMTC; however, 9.1% (n = 281) changed to a hotter category. The 10 am-3 pm start time was significantly hotter than all other time frames (83.0 °F ± 7.2, P < 0.05). Tennis experienced hotter practices (79.9 °F ± 6.9) than football (78.4 °F ± 8.5; P < 0.001) and cross country (78.2 °F ± 8.8, P < 0.001). Schools in the Midlands experienced hotter practices (80.1 °F ± 7.8) than upstate (P < 0.001) and coastal schools (P = 0.005). Competition WBGT was significantly cooler than practices (72.3 ± 10.5 °F, t = 12.04, P < 0.001) and differed across sports (F₂, 20.78 = 18.39, P < .001). Both cross-country (P = 0.003) and tennis (P < 0.001) were hotter than football. Schools should continuously monitor WBGT throughout practices and until November to optimize AMTC use. Risk mitigation strategies are needed for sports other than football to decrease the risk of exertional heat illnesses.

Increasing Health Risks During Outdoor Sports Due To Climate Change in Texas: Projections Versus Attitudes

Extreme heat is a recognized threat to human health. This study examines projected future trends of multiple measures of extreme heat across Texas throughout the next century, and evaluates the expected climate changes alongside Texas athletic staff (coach and athletic trainer) attitudes toward heat and climate change. Numerical climate simulations from the recently published Community Earth System Model version 2 and the Climate Model Intercomparison Project were used to predict changes in summer temperatures, heat indices, and wet bulb temperatures across Texas and also within specific metropolitan areas. A survey examining attitudes toward the effects of climate change on athletic programs and student athlete health was also distributed to high-school and university athletic staff. Heat indices are projected to increase beyond what is considered healthy/safe limits for outdoor sports activity by the mid-to-late 21st century. Survey results reveal a general understanding and acceptance of climate change and a need for adjustments in accordance with more dangerous heat-related events. However, a portion of athletic staff still do not acknowledge the changing climate and its implications for student athlete health and their athletic programs. Enhancing climate change and health communication across the state may initiate important changes to athletic programs (e.g., timing, duration, intensity, and location of practices), which should be made in accordance with increasingly dangerous temperatures and weather conditions. This work employs a novel interdisciplinary approach to evaluate future heat projections alongside attitudes from athletic communities toward climate change.

Proper Recognition and Management of Exertional Heat Stroke in a High School Cross-Country Runner: A Validation Clinical Case Report

A 14-year-old female high school cross- country runner (height = 154 cm, mass = 48.1 kg) with no history of exertional heat stroke (EHS) collapsed at the end of a race. An athletic trainer assessed the patient, who presented with difficulty breathing and then other signs of EHS (eg, confusion and agitation). The patient was taken to the medical area and draped with a towel, and a rectal temperature (Tre) of 106.9°F (41.6°C) was obtained. The emergency action plan was activated, and emergency medical services was called. The patient was submerged in a cold-water immersion tub until emergency medical services arrived (∼15 minutes; Tre = 100.1°F; cooling rate: 0.41°F.min-1[0.25°C.min-1]). At the hospital, the patient received intravenous fluids, and urine and blood tests were normal. She was not admitted and returned to running without sequelae. Following best practices, secondary school athletic trainers can prevent deaths from EHS by properly recognizing the condition and providing rapid cooling before transport.

Proposing the VetCompass clinical grading tool for heat-related illness in dogs

Heat-related illness is a potentially fatal condition in dogs. Rapid and accurate recognition of the severity can improve clinical management in affected dogs and lead to better outcomes. This study explored retrospective VetCompass veterinary clinical records to investigate the clinical signs recorded for dogs presenting with heat-related illness to primary-care veterinary practice from 2016 to 2018. The relative risk of death associated with these clinical signs was reported and used to develop a novel clinical grading tool. From the clinical records of 856 heat-related illness events, the most frequently recorded clinical signs were respiratory changes (68.73%) and lethargy (47.79%). The clinical signs with the highest relative risk of death were neurological dysfunction, gastrointestinal haemorrhage and bleeding disorders. The novel VetCompass Clinical Grading Tool for Heat-Related Illness in dogs defines three grades: mild (altered respiration, lethargy), moderate (gastrointestinal signs, a single seizure, episodic collapse) and severe (neurological dysfunction, gastrointestinal haemorrhage, bleeding disorders). This novel grading tool offers a simple, evidence-based device to improve recognition of heat-related illness in dogs and promote improved decision-making for earlier interventions such as cooling and hospitalisation. This could improve outcomes and protect the welfare of dogs in the face of rising global temperatures.