Superior Capsular Reconstruction of the Shoulder Using the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon: A Systematic Review of Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes

Arthroscopic additional biceps augmentation and biceps superior capsular reconstruction yield similar clinical and radiological outcomes for patients with medium to large rotator cuff tears

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of additional biceps augmentation (ABA) and biceps superior capsule reconstruction (BSCR) in arthroscopic medium to large rotator cuff tear (RCT) repair. Hypothesis: Both ABA and BSCR yielded comparable clinical and radiological outcomes and retear rates at the 2-year follow-up in patients with medium to large RCTs. Methods: Patients undergoing ABA or BSCR for RCT repairs were included retrospectively between January 2019 and May 2020. The preoperative and postoperative Constant-Murley score (CMS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, subjective shoulder value (SSV), visual analog scale (VAS), and range of motion (ROM) were recorded, as well as the radiographic evaluation. Results: 67 patients (41 with ABA, 26 with BSCR) were included. There were no significant differences regarding preoperative patient demographics between groups unless forward flexion. In the ABA group, CMS, ASES, SSV, and VAS improved significantly from 33.9 ± 6.0, 37.3 ± 8.7, 24.9 ± 12.3, and 5.1 ± 1.1 to 79.3 ± 8.4, 82.7 ± 8.4, 77.5 ± 10.9, and 2.4 ± 0.6, at 2-year follow-up (all p < .001). In the BSCR group, the CMS, ASES, SSV, and VAS significantly improved from 33.9 ± 5.5, 33.5 ± 11.6, 20.8 ± 9.8, and 5.3 ± 1.5 to 72.8 ± 12.9, 79.6 ± 12.1, 73.1 ± 10.2, and 2.7 ± 0.8, at follow-up (all p < .001). All ROM improved at follow-up in both groups (all p < .001). No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding the postoperative clinical and radiological results. All patients reached minimal clinically important differences for CMS, ASES, SSV, and VAS at the final follow-up. The retear rates in the ABA and BSCR groups were 0% and 7.7%, respectively (p = .001). Conclusions: Both ABA and BSCR provided similar clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with medium to large RCTs. The BSCR group had a higher retear rate than the ABA group. Level of Evidence: Level III, Retrospective comparative therapeutic trial. Clinical Relevance: Both ABA and BSCR provided comparable clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with medium to large RCTs.

The Evolution of Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: Current Trends and Future Perspectives

Arthroscopic shoulder surgery has undergone significant advancements over the past decades, transitioning from a primarily diagnostic tool to a comprehensive therapeutic approach. Technological innovations and refined surgical techniques have expanded the indications for arthroscopy, allowing minimally invasive management of shoulder instability and rotator cuff pathology. Methods: This narrative review explores the historical evolution, current trends, and future perspectives in arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Results: Key advancements in shoulder instability management include the evolution of the arthroscopic Bankart repair, the introduction of the remplissage technique for Hill-Sachs lesions, and the development of arthroscopic Latarjet procedures. Additionally, novel techniques such as Dynamic Anterior Stabilization (DAS) and bone block procedures have emerged as promising solutions for complex instability cases. In rotator cuff repair, innovations such as the suture-bridge double-row technique, superior capsular reconstruction (SCR), and biological augmentation strategies, including dermal allografts and bioinductive patches, have contributed to improving tendon healing and functional outcomes. The role of biologic augmentation, including biceps tendon autografts and subacromial bursa augmentation, is also gaining traction in enhancing repair durability. Conclusions: As arthroscopic techniques continue to evolve, the integration of biologic solutions and patient-specific surgical planning will likely define the future of shoulder surgery. This review provides a comprehensive assessment of current state-of-the-art techniques and discusses their clinical implications, with a focus on optimizing patient outcomes and minimizing surgical failure rates.

Autologous Tendon "Bamboo Raft" Graft for Reconstruction of Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears

Superior capsular reconstruction has shown long-term clinical effectiveness in treating massive irreparable rotator cuff tears, playing a key role in reducing humeral head translation and restoring the force-couple balance. Various graft techniques involving different types of grafts, such as autologous fascia lata, allogeneic dermal patches, and autologous long head of the biceps tendon, have been described. However, these approaches were often limited by factors such as extensive surgical trauma, high donor-site morbidity, and insufficient mechanical strength of the grafts. We describe autologous tendons, such as the hamstring tendon, fashioned into a "bamboo raft" configuration to create a graft for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. This technique offers several advantages, including minimal surgical trauma, low donor-site complication rates, and superior mechanical strength of the graft.

Effects of Biceps Rerouting on In Vivo Glenohumeral Kinematics in the Treatment of Large-to-Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic repair with the biceps rerouting (BR) technique has been determined to lead to promising clinical and biomechanical outcomes for treating large-to-massive rotator cuff tears (LMRCTs). However, the in vivo effects of BR on glenohumeral kinematics during functional shoulder movements have not been fully elucidated.

PURPOSE

To investigate whether BR provides a better restoration of shoulder kinematics compared with conventional rotator cuff repair (RCR).

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Patients who underwent either repair with the BR technique (BR group) or RCR alone (RCR group) for treating LMRCTs between January 2021 and May 2022 were enrolled. They underwent a 1-year postoperative kinematic evaluation of bilateral shoulders by performing scapular-plane abduction with a dual fluoroscopic imaging system. Glenohumeral translation in the superior-inferior (S-I) and anterior-posterior (A-P) directions was assessed in shoulder abduction at 10° increments. Moreover, the mean, maximum, minimum, and range of glenohumeral translation were calculated throughout the entire movement.

RESULTS

A total of 9 patients were enrolled in each group for final analysis, and baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. In the RCR group, compared with contralateral shoulders, the operative shoulders showed increased superior humeral head translation during lower abduction angles of 30° to 50° (all P≤ .004), with a greater maximum (P = .014) and a larger range (P = .002) for S-I translation throughout the entire movement. In the BR group, no significant differences between operative and contralateral shoulders were detected in any kinematic variables for S-I translation (all P≥ .132); however, the operative shoulders exhibited a larger maximum (P = .031), a smaller minimum (P = .008), and a larger range (P < .001) for A-P translation throughout the entire movement compared with the contralateral shoulders.

CONCLUSION

BR successfully reduced residual superior humeral head translation compared with conventional RCR and restored normal S-I glenohumeral kinematics in the treatment of LMRCTs. However, A-P glenohumeral kinematics was not fully restored after BR, and its effect on long-term clinical outcomes requires further investigation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

BR can be a promising technique to treat LMRCTs. However, its potential adverse effects on A-P glenohumeral kinematics should not be ignored, requiring further clinical evidence to determine long-term outcomes.

Which Factors Are Associated With Rerupture After Superior Capsular Reconstruction of the Shoulder With Autologous Long Biceps Tendon? - A Systematic Review

Based on a systematic review, the present work analyses factors associated with the rerupture rate or non-healing after superior capsular reconstruction with autologous long biceps tendon in the reconstruction of the rotator cuff of the shoulder.A systematic review of the U.S. National Library of Medicine/National Institutes of Health (PubMed) database and the Cochrane Library was conducted in September 2021 using the PRISMA checklist. Articles were identified and analysed that contained data on the rerupture rate after superior capsular reconstruction with autologous long biceps tendon in reconstruction of the rotator cuff of the shoulder. The aim was to identify factors associated with rerupture or non-healing. The risk of bias was determined using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.Primarily 86 hits could be generated. Seven articles from 2020 and 2021 met the inclusion criteria and were further analysed in terms of content. The evidence level was III to IV. Follow-up was between 12 (minimum) and 24 to 48 months. The risk of bias was not low. Factors that may be associated with rerupture or non-healing are diabetes mellitus and high-grade fatty degeneration of the subscapularis, infraspinatus, or teres minor as preoperative factors. Age, percent footprint coverage, tear size, symptom duration, number of bundles, acromioplasty performed, and tear configuration were not significant factors. Gender, degree of fatty degeneration of the supraspinatus and lesions of the subscapularis tendon were rated differently.According to the literature, but still currently with short-term observation periods, superior capsular reconstruction with an autologous long biceps tendon is another treatment option in the case of massive tears and elderly patients, if there is no high-grade fatty degeneration of the subscapularis, infraspinatus or teres minor. Diabetes mellitus has an unfavorable prognosis. Additional acromioplasty has so far not been associated with better outcomes.

A Comparative Study on Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using Fascia Lata Autograft With and Without Long Head of the Biceps Tendon Augmentation: Two-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes and Radiographic Analysis

BACKGROUND

Given the growing concerns regarding objective measures of clinical outcomes, attention has recently been devoted to the establishment of clinically significant outcome (CSO) thresholds for patient-reported functional scores after rotator cuff surgery.

PURPOSE

To retrospectively compare patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (PROMs) and radiographic data between patients who underwent arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) with and without long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) augmentation.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 43 patients receiving arthroscopic SCR between 2016 and 2020 were enrolled, including a biceps augmentation group (n = 27) and a nonaugmentation group (n = 16). Patients were asked an anchor question regarding their satisfaction and perception of improvements. PROMs of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Constant score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain scores and radiographic data including magnetic resonance imaging and plain radiographs were collected and compared between the 2 groups. Anchor questions in CSO analysis for deriving the minimal clinically importance difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), and maximal outcome improvement (MOI) values were applied ≥2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Based on satisfaction responses, 17 patients were classified as satisfied, 16 as unsatisfied, and 10 as fair. Additionally, 13 patients felt they were improved, 14 changed, and 16 unchanged. Intergroup comparison based on patients' satisfaction and perception of change or improvement exhibited significant differences in all 4 functional scores in favor of the satisfied and improved patients. However, there was no significant difference in the ΔVAS scores between the groups. CSO analyses showed no significant difference in percentage of patients achieving MCID, SCB, and PASS thresholds for the ΔASES, ΔConstant, and ΔSANE scores between patients undergoing arthroscopic SCR with or without LHBT augmentation. A significant difference was found in the percentage of patients achieving the MOI for ΔASES score with 70.4% in the augmented group and 37.5% in the nonaugmented group, respectively. The mean acromiohumeral distance (AHD) differed significantly between augmentation (8.1 ± 2.2 mm) and nonaugmentation (7 ± 1.9 mm) groups. The graft tear rate did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in PROs and percentage of patients achieving MCID, SCB, and PASS between isolated and augmented SCR groups. A higher percentage of patients achieving MOI and slightly greater AHD were found in the augmented group. Further evaluation is required to determine if there is any long-term benefit to LHBT augmentation of SCR.

Superior capsular reconstruction with the long head of the biceps tendon achieves excellent clinical results and low rotator cuff rerupture rates one year after cuff repair surgery

PURPOSE

To analyze the clinical one-year evolution of healed and rerupture lesions in patients who received a rotator cuff repair plus Superior Capsular Reconstruction (SCR) with the long head of the biceps (LHB). Moreover, to compare this evolution between men and women.

METHODS

A pilot study was conducted on patients who underwent a rotator cuff repair plus SCR with LHB between February 2021 and June 2022. All patients completed pre-operative and one-year post-operative evaluations for tendon type of tear and tendon integrity using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)after one year of the surgery. Besides, functionality was evaluated with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score; the visual analog scale for pain (VAS); and the Constant score.

RESULTS

A total of 38 patients completed the one-year final evaluation, they presented an increased functionality score to 83 and 86 in Constant and ASES scales (p < .001), respectively. Besides, 84% of the patients presented a healed cuff, while rerupture occurred in 16% of the patients. There were differences between the healed and rerupture patients in the total Constant score, with a remarkable increase in the strength subscale, almost double for patients with healed cuff (p < .001); in the same way, daily life activity score, and balance subscale increased, while pain score decreased in the healed cuff group (p < .05). There was no difference in functionality between men and women (p > .05). Besides, almost all patients achieved the MCID in both ASES and Constant total scores, irrespectively of the healing group.

CONCLUSION

The cuff repair using SCR with the LHB achieved a low percentage of rerupture and a functional improvement after one year of follow-up. Patients who healed the lesion presented more strength and better performance in daily life activities than those with cuff repurture. Thus, SCR + LHB procedure can be considered an efficient technique for rotator cuff repair surgery for both men and women. Although a comparison with a control group is needed to confirm these findings.

Biceps tendon autograft augmentation for rotator cuff and instability procedures: a narrative review

Rotator cuff tears (RCT) and instability are the most common surgically treated shoulder pathologies. The concept of augmentation using the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) autograft was created to improve the results of surgical treatment of these pathologies, especially in cases of chronic and massive injuries. The popularity of using the LHBT for augmentation is evidenced by the significant number of publications on this topic published in the last 3 years; however, only one systematic review has been published regarding only LHBT augmentation for massive RCTs. Several studies comparing partial repair with partial repair and additional LHBT augmentation for RCT showed superior clinical outcomes and lower re-tear rates when LHBT augmentation was performed. There is a rising popularity of using LHBT as an autograft to perform superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) in case of irreparable rotator cuff tears. In recent years, shoulder stabilization by arthroscopic Bankart repair with biceps augmentation has been promoted with very promising short-term results. The evidence provided by studies appears to be sufficient to recommend the use of LHBT for augmentation whenever necessary; however, larger studies with long-term follow-up are needed.

Surgical Management of Massive Irreparable Cuff Tears: Superior Capsule Reconstruction and Rotator Cable Reconstruction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) present treatment challenges. Recently, superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) and anterior cable reconstruction have emerged as surgical options, but no single approach is superior. This review provides an overview of SCR and cable reconstruction techniques, including biomechanical studies, clinical outcomes, and surgical considerations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Biomechanical studies show SCR with autografts or allografts improves glenohumeral stability and mechanics. Clinical outcomes of SCR demonstrate improved range of motion, function scores, and pain relief in short-term studies. Anterior cable reconstruction reduces superior humeral head translation and subacromial pressures in biomechanical models. Early clinical studies report improved rotator cuff healing and outcomes for cable reconstruction in specific irreparable tear patterns. SCR and cable reconstruction are viable surgical options for MIRCTs based on early encouraging results. However, higher-level comparative studies with long-term follow-up are still needed. Careful consideration of tear pattern, patient factors, and surgical goals is required to optimize treatment of MIRCTs. Further research is necessary to determine the optimal role for these procedures.

Outcomes of Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon in Large to Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

(1) Background: Addressing large to massive rotator cuff tears (LMRCTs) poses complex challenges. This systematic review investigated outcomes of superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) with the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) compared to conventional rotator cuff repair (RCR) for LMRCTs. (2) Methods: A systematic search across the MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases until 1 October 2023 identified studies that directly compared SCR with LHBT with conventional RCR in patients with LMRCTs and included a minimum of a 12-month follow-up period. The assessed outcome measures encompassed retear rates, functional outcomes, range of motion (ROM), and acromiohumeral interval (AHI). Risk of bias assessment was conducted via the Robins-I tool. (3) Results: In six studies with 456 cases (210 SCR using LHBT and 246 using RCR), SCR with LHBT significantly reduced retear rates (OR = 0.21; 95% CI, 0.12-0.36; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%). Furthermore, SCR with LHBT showed significant improvement in range of forward flexion (SMD 0.32, 95% CI: 0.09-0.55, p < 0.01, I2 = 39%) and AHI (SMD 0.61, 95% CI: 0.31-0.92, p < 0.01, I2 = 0%) postoperatively. (4) Conclusion: SCR with LHBT is a safe and effective treatment for LMRCTs, reducing retear rates, maintaining greater postoperative AHI, and improving ROM compared to conventional RCR. Additional high-quality interventional studies are needed to confirm these results.

Editorial Commentary: Superior Capsular Reconstructions in Cases of Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tendons Only Partially Restore Anatomy, Yet Significantly Normalize Biomechanics-Without Resorting to Reverse Anatomy

The goal of shoulder superior capsular reconstruction and/or anterior cable reconstructions, at least in terms of biomechanics, is to primarily restore a fulcrum to assist with pain control and functional optimization, with the secondary hope of maintaining cartilage. Fully restoring glenohumeral joint loads with SCR cannot be expected in the setting of persistent tendon insufficiency. Biomechanical studies characterizing shoulder capsular reconstructions have demonstrated anatomic and functional restorations toward normalization when tested with standard biomechanical methods. Glenohumeral abduction, superior humeral head migration, deltoid forces, and glenohumeral contact pressure and area, can be optimized toward the normal intact condition, as measured by motion tracking and pressure mapping in real time, using dynamic actuators. Insofar as restoring normal native anatomy is considered a fundamental priority, with the idea that joint functional longevity is enhanced by preserving anatomy, as surgeons, we should not lose sight of reconstruction over replacement (such as nonanatomic reverse total shoulder arthroplasty) as a favored goal. Anatomy-based reconstructions such as superior capsule or anterior cable reconstruction, may prove over time to be the best primary treatment as knowledge and innovations (technical and medical) develop, with nonanatomic arthroplasty truly being a last resort (yet a clinically viable option when indicated).

Editorial Commentary: Superior Capsular Reconstruction Employing Allograft Heals and Functions Well if the Graft Is Sufficiently Thick and Stiff

Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) has fallen into disrepute, and the numbers performed appear to be on the decline because it is technically demanding and time-consuming, requires a long postoperative recovery, and does not always heal or function as expected. In addition, two "new kids on the block," the subacromial balloon spacer and the lower trapezius tendon transfer, have emerged as viable alternatives for low-demand patients who cannot tolerate a lengthy recovery and for high-demand patients who lack external rotation strength, respectively. However, carefully selected patients continue to do well after SCR, when surgery is meticulously performed using a graft that is sufficiently thick and stiff. The clinical results and healing rates after SCR using allograft tensor fascia lata are comparable with those after SCR using tensor fascia lata autograft and without donor-site morbidity. Robust comparative clinical study is needed to sort out the optimal graft type and thickness for SCR and the precise indications for each of the surgical treatment options for the irreparable rotator cuff tear, but let's not "throw the baby out with the bathwater" and abandon SCR altogether.

Early Treatment of Shoulder Pathology Is Necessary but Not Enough Is Being Performed

Delayed treatment of shoulder instability results in bone loss requiring more-complicated surgery, in turn resulting in less-optimal outcomes. Similarly, delayed treatment of repairable rotator cuff tears results in irreparable tears requiring more-complicated surgery and resulting in less-optimal outcomes. Delayed treatment of shoulder pathology is a problem. Solutions include education and research investigation.

Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears Results in Significant Improvements in Patient Reported Outcomes and Range of Motion: A Systematic Review

Purpose

The purposes of this study were to evaluate the clinical outcomes (with the minimum mean follow-up period of 2 years) of arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (ASCR) using different grafts for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) and to explore whether margin convergence in ASCR affects range of motion (ROM) outcomes.

Methods

This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO and was then conducted following PRISMA guidelines by searching the databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library database before April 2021. These literature searches investigating the clinical outcomes of ASCR were included. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the MINORS criteria. The data, including margin convergence, patient-reported outcome scores, range of motion, and complications, were extracted and analyzed. The minimal clinically important differences (MCID) criteria was used to define clinical significance.

Results

15 studies met the inclusion criteria. All studies reported statistically significant improvements in visual analog scale scores (range: 2.07 to 7.1) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (range: 18.1 to 58). Significant improvements of Constant scores were noted in 4 of 5 reporting studies (mean improvement ranged from 14.64 to 50.79). Active forward flexion/elevation (11 studies), active abduction (4 studies), and active external rotation (8 studies) displayed improvements in all reporting studies, with mean changes ranging from 12 to 73.68, 19 to 89.21, and 1 to 24.74, respectively. The mean change of postoperative acromiohumeral distance ranged from −0.86 mm to 3.2 mm in 9 studies. The postoperative complication rate of ASCR ranged from 4.5% to 47.6%. The anterior margin convergence in SCR was associated with a relatively poor improvement in active external rotation.

Conclusions

ASCR contributes to significant improvements in patient-reported clinical outcomes and ROM at follow-up after a mean of more than two years, emerging as a viable option for patients with MIRCTs. The anterior margin convergence should be prudently chosen, especially in ASCR using fascia lata autograft, on account of the probable restriction on postoperative active external rotation.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.

Anterior Cable Reconstruction: Prioritize Rotator Cable and Tendon Cord When Considering Superior Capsular Reconstruction

Although distinct in name, the anterior cable of the superior capsule and tendon cord of the supraspinatus are structurally one in the same at the attachment on the greater tuberosity footprint. Force transmission through both structures where they converge and interdigitate at this location is disproportionately high, which has implications on functional impact. Superior capsule reconstruction, and, specifically, the anterior cable of the superior capsule, has been shown to assist in maintaining superior stability and a functional fulcrum of the glenohumeral joint, without overconstraining range of motion. Anterior cable reconstructions have been described for specific indications, including full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus and anterior one-half of the infraspinatus. Cord-like grafts, including long head biceps tendon autografts and semitendinosus allografts, can provide relative technical ease during surgery compared to sheet-like grafts for this indication. Side-to-side sutures between anterior cable reconstruction graft and posterosuperior capsule retension the native capsule to optimize its natural functional role. Accounting for abduction and rotation at the time of fixation and employing "loop-around" fixation sutures (no sutures through the graft), are critical concepts to consider in terms of kinematics and limiting graft failure. With both the biomechanically and clinically based literature demonstrating functionality with maintenance of the superior capsule (and specifically the anterior cable of the capsule), despite rotator cuff tendon insufficiency or irreparability, the anterior cable of the superior capsule should be prioritized when considering full-thickness rotator cuff tears that naturally involve both the capsular cable and the supraspinatus tendon cord. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V (expert opinion).

The Biomechanical and Histological Processes of Rerouting Biceps to Treat Chronic Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears in a Rabbit Model

BACKGROUND

Recently, the biceps was rerouted into a newly fabricated bicipital groove for in situ superior capsular reconstruction (SCR), resulting in promising time-zero cadaveric and clinical outcomes. However, no studies have determined the in vivo biomechanical and histological processes after the biceps is transposed to a nonanatomic position.

PURPOSE

To explore the in vivo biomechanical and histological processes of the rerouting biceps tendon to treat chronic irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCTs) in a rabbit model.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

A total of 94 skeletally mature male rabbits were used to create a chronic IRCT model in the supraspinatus tendon. Then, the biceps rerouting procedures were performed in rabbits with chronic IRCT. Eighteen rabbits were sacrificed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 weeks postoperatively for biomechanical testing, micro-computed tomography scanning, and histological analysis. The biomechanical and histological changes of intra- and extra-articular portions of the rerouting biceps were evaluated at each time point, with the contralateral native superior capsule (NSC) and the native biceps (NB) as controls, respectively. The morphology and bone formation of the fabricated bicipital grooves were evaluated, with native grooves as controls.

RESULTS

The intra-articular rerouting biceps tendon was progressively remodeled over time, displaying denser fibers and more mature collagen than those of the NSC, with gradual improvements in the tendon-to-bone healing interface from 6 to 12 weeks. Consequently, the failure load and stiffness of the intra-articular rerouting biceps portion increased with time and were significantly higher than those of the NSC from 9 weeks. Similarly, the extra-articular portion of the rerouting biceps progressively healed into a new bicipital groove, as demonstrated by a smaller tendon-to-bone interface from 6 to 12 weeks, resulting in greater failure load and stiffness at 9 and 12 weeks than those of the NB attachment. The newly fabricated bicipital groove showed similar morphology to that of the native groove with sufficient trabecular bone formed underneath.

CONCLUSION

The rerouting biceps could progressively remodel and heal into the newly fabricated bicipital groove over time, resulting in greater biomechanical performances in intra- and extra-articular portions than the NSC and the NB attachment.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The biceps rerouting technique may be a feasible procedure to perform in situ SCR to treat IRCT in the future clinical practice; however, more clinical evidence is required.

Assessing the accuracy of arthroscopic and open measurements of the size of rotator cuff tears: A simulation-based study

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic procedures are commonly performed for rotator cuff pathology. Repair of rotator cuff tears is a commonly performed procedure. The intraoperative evaluation of the tear size and pattern contributes to the choice and completion of the technique and the prognosis of the repair.

AIM

To compare the arthroscopic and open measurements with the real dimensions of three different patterns of simulated rotator cuff tears of known size using a plastic shoulder model.

METHODS

We created three sizes and patterns of simulated supraspinatus tears on a plastic shoulder model (small and large U-shaped, oval-shaped). Six orthopaedic surgeons with three levels of experience measured the dimensions of the tears arthroscopically, using a 5 mm probe, repeating the procedure three times, and then using a ruler (open technique). Arthroscopic, open and computerized measurements were compared.

RESULTS

A constant underestimation of specific dimensions of the tears was found when measured with an arthroscope, compared to both the open and computerized measurements (mean differences up to -7.5 ± 5.8 mm, P < 0.001). No differences were observed between the open and computerized measurements (mean difference -0.4 ± 1.6 mm). The accuracy of arthroscopic and open measurements was 90.5% and 98.5%, respectively. When comparing between levels of experience, senior residents reported smaller tear dimensions when compared both to staff surgeons and fellows.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that arthroscopic measurements of full-thickness rotator cuff tears constantly underestimate the dimensions of the tears. Development of more precise arthroscopic techniques or tools for the evaluation of the size and type of rotator cuff tears are necessary.

Arthroscopic Biological Augmentation for Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: The Biceps-Cuff-Bursa Composite Repair

Surgical repair of massive and chronic rotator cuff tears is difficult due to tendon retraction and severe atrophy, and the resultant retear rate in the structurally weak tendons is high. Commercially available patches and bioinductive scaffolds have been used to provide strength and superior healing environment in partial and complete rotator cuff tears. Biological biceps autograft has been used for superior capsular reconstruction, and the subacromial bursa has been shown to have significant pluripotent stem cell potency for tendon healing. We describe our technique for combined use of the long biceps tendon (LBT) and vasculature-preserved subacromial bursa as autografts in rotator cuff repair augmentation. The technique involves obtaining a LBT graft of sufficient length using a "traction and tenodesis" technique. The subacromial bursa is mobilized as a continuous layer (vascular bursal duvet) by maintaining its medial and lateral vascularity. All-suture anchors are used to minimize the insertion apertures (3 mm) in tuberosity. The bursa is advanced laterally, and the mobilized cuff is repaired together as a biceps-cuff-bursa composite unit. Combined use of the biceps and bursa as biological autografts has the advantage of structural and regenerative augmentation, and the autografts are easily accessible without added cost.

Editorial Commentary: Anterior Cable Reconstruction for the Shoulder Superior Capsule: Time for "Indication Rounds"

Anterior cable reconstruction (ACR) techniques for the superior capsule are multiple and varied. To optimize patient outcomes, technical considerations must be supported by basic science, both anatomically and biomechanically. ACR was designed to treat only partially repairable rotator cuff tendon tears, to provide a static support to a dynamic partial (and therefore "nonanatomic") repair, and to treat tears that could not be treated by transosseous-equivalent footprint-restoring "anatomic" repairs (both capsule and tendon repaired), but were also not so large as to necessitate superior capsule reconstruction. ACR allows restoration of posterosuperior capsular function with side-to-side repair sutures, and much of the biomechanical functionality comes from using whatever inherent native superior capsule is available. Cable reconstructions should be secured to normal attachment sites on the glenoid and greater tuberosity sulcus. Also, graft tension must be accounted for when considering humeral motion such as rotation and adduction. The indications for ACR need to be carefully considered and account for both anatomic and biomechanical rationales. In the face of new ACR techniques, the need to discern what is possible versus what procedure is indicated cannot be overlooked.