Clinical Reality and Treatment for Local Recurrence of Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Coccygodynia in a Long-Term Cancer Survivor Diagnosed with Metastatic Cancer: A Case Report

Background and Objectives: Rectal cancer is considered cured if no recurrence is found during the 5-year follow-up period after treatment. After this period, patients often believe that the cancer is completely eradicated. However, in modern society, where lifespans have become longer, it is important to recognize that metastatic cancer may occur long after the initial treatment has concluded. This highlights the necessity of continued vigilance and the long-term follow-up of cancer survivors. Case report: We present a case of metastatic cancer of the coccyx in an 87-year-old female patient. This patient had undergone successful surgery and treatment for rectal cancer 10 years prior. She was considered cured after the standard 5-year follow-up period as she showed no signs of recurrence. The patient presented with simple coccygeal pain as the main complaint, without any other accompanying symptoms such as weight loss, fever, or changes in bowel habits, typically associated with cancer recurrence. During the clinical evaluation, irregularities in the bone cortex were detected while performing a nerve block using ultrasound. Given these findings, further diagnostic evaluations were performed. Advanced imaging techniques including MRI and CT scans led to a diagnosis of coccygeal metastasis. Conclusions: While the 5-year mark post-treatment is a significant milestone for rectal cancer patients, it does not guarantee the absolute eradication of the disease. Long-term monitoring and a thorough evaluation of new symptoms are essential for the early detection and management of late metastatic recurrences. This approach ensures that patients receive timely and appropriate care, potentially improving outcomes and quality of life.

Risk-factors for locally advanced rectal cancer relapse after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: A single center experience

The overall prognosis of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) remains unsatisfactory due to a high incidence of disease relapse. The present understanding of the factors that determine the likelihood of recurrence is limited or ineffective. We aimed to identify the main risk factors influencing tumor relapse in LARC patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and surgical treatment in a single center in Republika Srpska. Patients with stage II or stage III who received nCRT before surgery for primary rectal cancer at the Oncology Clinic, University Clinical Center of Republika Srpska from January 2017 and December 2022 were included in the study. We collected patient demographics, clinical stage and characteristics, neoadjuvant therapy, and surgical methods, along with the pathological response after treatment completion, and analyzed them to identify the risk factors for tumor relapse. Out of 109 patients diagnosed with LARC, 34 (31,2%) had tumor relapse. The median time to relapse was 54 months. Participants with clinical T4 stage had a significantly shorter relapse time compared to the patients with clinical T2/3 stage. Subjects with positive lymph nodes removed, perivascular and perineural invasion, intraoperative perforation and patients without ypN stage improvement had significantly shorter time to relapse. Subjects with T4 stage had more than 4 times higher risk of relapse than patients with clinical T2/3 stage. Higher clinical T stage was an essential risk factor for tumor relapse in LARC patients after nCRT and surgical treatment. Comprehensive understanding and identification of the risk factors for tumor relapse in LARC patients are crucial for improving their long-term outcomes.

The Prevalence of Back Pain in Patients Operated on Due to Colorectal Cancer Depending on the Type of Surgical Procedure Performed

PURPOSE

Low back pain presents a serious challenge for numerous medical specialties. The purpose of this study was to assess disability due to low back pain in patients operated on due to colorectal cancer depending on the type of surgery performed.

METHODS

This prospective observational study was carried out in the period of July 2019 through March 2020. Included in the study were patients with colorectal cancer for scheduled surgeries including anterior resection of rectum (AR), laparoscopic anterior resection of rectum (LAR), Hartmann's procedure (HART), or abdominoperineal resection of rectum (APR). The Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire was used as the research tool. The study patients were surveyed at three time points: before surgery, six months after surgery, and one year after surgery.

RESULTS

The analysis of study results revealed that an increase in the degree of disability and functioning impairment occurred in all groups between time points I and II, with the differences being statistically significant (p < 0.05). The inter-group comparative analysis of the total Oswestry questionnaire scores revealed statistically significant differences, with the impairment of function being most severe within the APR group and least severe within the LAR group.

CONCLUSION

The study results showed that low back pain contributes to impaired functioning of patients operated on due to colorectal cancer regardless of the type of procedure performed. A reduction in the degree of disability due to low back pain was observed one year after the procedure in patients having undergone LAR.

Clinical study on risk factors related to postoperative recurrence or metastasis of rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Rectal cancer is usually treated by surgery, but recurrence or metastasis seriously affect the quality of life and survival of patients. Identifying the risk factors for postoperative recurrence or metastasis of rectal cancer has important guiding value for the treatment of rectal cancer. However, the research on risk factors of postoperative recurrence or metastasis of rectal cancer has not been unified.

Methods

The data of all patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery in The Fifth People's Hospital of Shanghai, Fudan University, from 2016 to 2020 were collected and analyzed. A total of 185 patients were included for statistical analysis and were divided into a recurrence or metastasis group and a non-recurrence or metastasis group. Patients were followed up according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines by enhanced CT or MRI, and colonoscopy. The cut-off of the research was recurrence, metastasis, or death. Logistic regression analysis and Cox regression analysis were used to analyze the risk factors related to postoperative recurrence or metastasis of rectal cancer, and the survival curve was drawn.

Results

Multiple logistic regression analysis showed involvement of the mesorectal fascia (MRF) [OR (odds ratio) =2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.16-7.29, P=0.023], nerve and vascular invasion (OR =1.7, 95% CI: 1.08-2.59, P=0.022), intraoperative blood transfusion (OR =3.7, 95% CI: 1.45-9.40, P=0.006), and Dukes staging (OR =2.3, 95% CI: 1.26-4.35, P=0.007) were independent risk factors for postoperative recurrence or metastasis of rectal cancer. Involvement of mesenteric fascia infiltration (OR =11.5, 95% CI: 1.49-88.79, P=0.019) and Dukes stage (OR =3.0, 95% CI: 1.46-6.26, P=0.003) were independent risk factors for liver metastasis, while nerve and vascular invasion (OR =2.4, 95% CI: 1.19-5.00, P=0.015) was an independent risk factor for pulmonary metastasis.

Conclusions

Postoperative recurrence or metastasis of rectal cancer is related to many factors. These findings have clinical guiding value and significance for the follow up and prognosis of patients with rectal cancer after surgery. Large-scale prospective clinical studies are needed.

Pattern of Rectal Cancer Recurrence Following Potentially Curative Surgical Treatment

Survival in rectal cancer has been related mainly to clinical and pathological staging. Recurrence is the most challenging issue when surgical treatment of rectal cancer is concerned. This study aims to establish a recurrence pattern for rectal adenocarcinoma submitted to surgical treatment between June 2003 and July 2021. After applying the exclusion criteria to 305 patients, 166 patients were analyzed. Global recurrence was found in 18.7% of them, while 7.8% have had local recurrence. Recurrences were diagnosed from 5 to 92 months after the surgical procedure, with a median of 32.5 months. Follow-up varied from 6 to 115 months. Recurrence, in literature, is usually between 3 and 35% in 5 years and shows a 5-year survival rate of only 5%. In around 50% of cases, recurrence is local, confined to the pelvis. This study was consonant with the literature in most aspects evaluated, although a high rate of local recurrence remains a challenge in seeking better surgical outcomes.

Comparison of postoperative laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision on lower urinary tract function in men with rectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated male voiding dysfunction (VD) or lower urinary tract function in rectal cancer (RC) patients after laparoscopic or open total mesorectal excision with pelvic autonomic nerve preservation (PANP).

METHODS

One hundred and eighty-seven male RC patients admitted between January 2016 and May 2019 were enrolled in this study, 112 of whom underwent laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LTME) and 75 underwent open total mesorectal excision (OTME). The International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS) was compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The postoperative IPSS in patients with RC was elevated on day 7 and gradually decreased during the first month after surgery. Compared with the OTME group, the IPSS scores decreased less in the LTME group at week 1, and months 1 and 3 postoperatively (6.82 ± 2.13 vs 10.15 ± 3.86, 5.70 ± 2.45 vs 7.21 ± 2.0, and 5.01 ± 2.09 vs 5.75 ± 2.55, respectively; P < 0.05). The VD rate was significantly lower in the LTME group than the OTME group at 1, 2, and 3 weeks postoperatively (21.4% vs 26.8%,13.4% vs 25.3%, and 9.8% vs18.6%, respectively; P < 0.05); however, there was no major difference in the incidence of VD 6 months postoperatively between the two groups (P > 0.05). VD was more frequent in the OTME group than the LTME group 6 months postoperatively, but the difference was not statistically significant (odds ratio = 1.857, 95% CI, 0.964-3.645, P = 0.064).

CONCLUSIONS

LTME may be superior to OTME with respect to PANP of lower urinary tract function in males with RC.