Impact of Periodontal Attachment Loss on the Outcome of Endodontic Microsurgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The outcome of combined use of iRoot BP Plus and iRoot SP for root-end filling in endodontic microsurgery: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

Root-end filling is important for the clinical outcome of endodontic microsurgery. Our previous study showed that combined application of iRoot BP Plus Root Repair Material (BP-RRM) and iRoot SP Injectable Root Canal Sealer (SP-RCS) in root-end filling exhibited better apical sealing as compared to the application of BP-RRM alone. The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the effect of the combined use of BP-RRM and SP-RCS on the prognosis of teeth with refractory periapical diseases after endodontic microsurgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

240 teeth with refractory periapical diseases scheduled for endodontic microsurgery were randomly divided into BP-RRM/SP-RCS group (n = 120) and BP-RRM group (n = 120). The patients were followed up at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after endodontic microsurgery. Pre- and post-operative clinical and radiographic examinations were performed to evaluate the treatment outcome. The 1-year success rate of endodontic microsurgery in BP-RRM/SP-RCS and BP-RRM groups was compared by Chi-square test. Factors that might impact the prognosis were further analyzed using Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

A total of 221 teeth completed the 12-month follow-up. The 1-year success rates of the BP-RRM/SP-RCS and BP-RRM groups were 94.5% (104/110) and 92.8% (103/111), respectively. The combined use of BP-RRM and SP-RCS achieved a clinical outcome comparable to BP-RRM alone (P = 0.784). Tooth type (P = 0.002), through-and-through/apico-marginal lesion (P = 0.049), periodontal status (P < 0.0001), and Kim's lesion classification (P < 0.0001) were critical factors associated with the 1-year success of endodontic microsurgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined use of BP-RRM and SP-RCS is a practicable method for root-end filling in endodontic microsurgery with a satisfactory 1-year clinical outcome.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The combined application of BP-RRM and SP-RCS in EMS is an effective root-end filling method with a satisfactory 1-year clinical outcome.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100052174).

A retrospective study on the prognostic factors and success, survival, and failure outcomes of treated endodontic-periodontal lesions

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this retrospective study was to determine possible prognostic factors of endodontic-periodontal lesions and to compare success, survival, and failure outcomes of treated endodontic-periodontal lesions across different treatment modalities, demographic variables, and anatomical tooth variations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data was collected from patient records in the patient management system (Salud, Titanium Solutions) from the Griffith University Dental Clinic between January 2008 and December 2021. The search strategy used the terms "endodontic periodontal lesion," "periodontal endodontic lesion," "endo perio lesion," "perio endo lesion," and "EPL." The 88 cases which met inclusion and exclusion criteria were analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall success rate was 46.6%, with 21.6% of teeth surviving and 31.8% of teeth failing. Bone loss extending to the apical third (OR = 0.3, 95% CI [0.104, 0.866]), and probing depths of 5-7 mm (OR = 0.147, 95% CI [0.034, 0.633]) and 8-10 mm (OR = 0.126, 95% CI [0.029, 0.542]) were associated with a statistically significant lower odds of success (p < .05). A history of no periodontal disease (OR = 7.705, 95% CI [1.603, 37.037]) was associated with a statistically significant higher odds of success (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

Practitioners should be aware of bone loss to the apical third, deep probing depths, and a history of periodontal disease as possible prognostic factors that can affect the success rate when treating endodontic-periodontal lesions. Further research with more stringent control over operator factors should be done to investigate these variables.

Risk factors associated with the survival of endodontically treated teeth: A retrospective chart review

BACKGROUND

Studies on risk factors affecting tooth retention after endodontic treatment in dental school settings are limited. Understanding these factors is crucial for preserving teeth. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate patient- and tooth-level risk factors associated with the survival of endodontically treated teeth.

METHODS

Electronic health records of patients who underwent endodontic treatment at the School of Dental Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania from 2017 through 2020 were analyzed. Patient-level factors included age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification, smoking history, diabetes status, and amoxicillin allergy. Tooth-level factors included position, presence of restorations, and periodontal conditions with preprosthetic treatments.

RESULTS

The results of this study indicate that the patient-level factors significantly associated with tooth retention included age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Classification Status, and amoxicillin allergy. Tooth-level factors such as core buildup, full-coverage crown, healthy periodontium, and scaling and root planing were also associated with higher survival rates. Mandibular premolars had higher survival rates than mandibular molars.

CONCLUSIONS

This investigation revealed that the tooth retention rate of endodontically treated teeth was 96.2% after initial root canal treatment, 92.4% for nonsurgical re-treatment, and 97.8% for surgical re-treatment.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

The tooth retention of the endodontic treatment was associated with healthy periodontium, tooth structure, tooth position, tooth restoration, and the patient's overall health.

In vitro evaluation of the sealing ability of combined use of iRoot BP Plus and iRoot SP for root-end filling

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the sealing ability of combined application of iRoot BP Plus Root Repair Material (BP-RRM) and iRoot SP Injectable Root Canal Sealer (SP-RCS) for root-end filling.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 120 extracted human teeth were used in this study and were randomly divided into four groups. The BP-RRM+SP-RCS group included teeth retro-filled with combined use of BP-RRM and SP-RCS (n=45), and the BP-RRM group included teeth retro-filled by BP-RRM alone (n=45). Teeth without root-end preparation and filling were equally divided into positive control (n=15) and negative control (n=15). The apical sealing ability was evaluated by micro-CT analysis, dye penetrant examination, bacterial leakage test, and glucose leakage test.

RESULTS

Micro-CT analysis showed that the total void fraction of BP-RRM+SP-RCS group was significantly lower than that of BP-RRM group, particularly at the coronal 1/3 segment of the retro-filled roots. Consistently, the maximum linear depth of dye leakage in BP-RRM+SP-RCS group was less than that of BP-RRM group. Bacterial leakage test showed that the microbial leakage in BP-RRM+SP-RCS group was significantly less than that in BP-RRM group. However, no significant difference in glucose leakage between BP-RRM+SP-RCS group and BP-RRM group was observed.

CONCLUSION

Combined use of BP-RRM and SP-RCS for root-end filling promotes apical sealing in vitro.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Combined use of BP-RRM and SP-RCS for root-end filling exhibited better apical sealing as compared to BP-RRM alone in vitro, and this may help reducing technical sensitivity and promoting clinical efficiency during endodontic microsurgery.

Intentional Replantation as a Starting Approach for a Multidisciplinary Treatment of a Mandibular Second Molar: A Case Report

Intentional replantation (IR) may offer a solution for persistent periapical lesions associated with endodontically treated teeth. A 35-year-old male patient presented with pain associated with the left mandibular second molar and hypoesthesia. Upon clinical examination, increased probing pocket depth in the mid-buccal surface was detected. Cone beam computed tomography revealed a previous non-surgical root canal treatment, with root canal filling material extrusion adjacent to the inferior alveolar nerve, a fractured instrument in the mesial root, and a large periapical radiolucency involving both teeth 37 and 36. A diagnosis of symptomatic post-treatment apical periodontitis was established. After discussing treatment options with the patient, an IR of tooth 37 was performed. Extra-oral procedures were completed in 17 min. At 9 months, hypoesthesia resolution was reported, and apical healing was radiographically observed. After 2.5 years, the replanted tooth showed extensive root resorption. An extraction with alveolar ridge preservation, using leukocyte-platelet rich fibrin (L-PRF), was performed. Six months after tooth extraction and regeneration, implant placement surgery was carried out. IR presents a valid treatment modality for the management of post-treatment apical periodontitis. When orthograde retreatment or apical microsurgery prove to be unfeasible, IR is a unique procedure with the potential to promote tooth preservation in properly selected cases. Although unsuccessful after 2.5 years, the IR of tooth 37 allowed for bone regeneration, the maintenance of tooth 36 vitality, and hypoesthesia resolution.

Multifactorial Analysis of Endodontic Microsurgery Using Finite Element Models

Background: The present study aimed to classify the relative contributions of four biomechanical factors—the root-end filling material, the apical preparation, the root resection length, and the bone height—on the root stresses of the resected premolar. Methods: A design of experiments approach based on a defined subset of factor combinations was conducted to calculate the influence of each factor and their interactions. Sixteen finite element models were created and analyzed using the von Mises stress criterion. The robustness of the design of experiments was evaluated with nine supplementary models. Results: The current study showed that the factors preparation and bone height had a high influence on root stresses. However, it also revealed that nearly half of the biomechanical impact was missed without considering interactions between factors, particularly between resection and preparation. Conclusions: Design of experiments appears to be a valuable strategy to classify the contributions of biomechanical factors related to endodontics. Imagining all possible interactions and their clinical impact is difficult and can require relying on one’s own experience. This study proposed a statistical method to quantify the mechanical risk when planning apicoectomy. A perspective could be to integrate the equation defined herein in future software to support decision-making.