Comparing Perioperative Outcome Measures of the Dynamic Hip Screw and the Femoral Neck System

Two-year outcomes of internal fixation with femoral neck system in patients with femoral neck fracture in an Asian population

Background

Femoral neck fractures (FNF) are one of the most common fractures, with a projected increase in incidence with population growth and ageing. The Femoral Neck System (FNS) launched in 2019 was developed specifically for fixation of FNF with the purported advantages of providing both angular and rotational stability. We report our experience with the FNS and evaluate its effectiveness and associated complications.

Methods

A retrospective case series of 50 patients who underwent surgical fixation for FNF from August 2020 to October 2021 using the FNS in two Singapore tertiary institutions with at least 2 years follow-up were included. Clinical data (patients' demographics, fracture classification, intra-operative and post-operative complications) were reviewed. Radiological analysis assessed the pre- and immediate post-operative garden alignment index (GAI) and presence of femoral neck shortening at 3 months.

Results

The mean age was 63.5 years (SD 16.9, range 26-92). Five (10 %), 34 (68 %) and 11 (22 %) were ASA 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Twenty-four (48 %), 16 (32 %), 4 (8 %), and 6 (12 %) patients sustained Garden's 1, 2, 3 and 4 FNF respectively. The mean operative duration was 66.2 min (SD 20.5) and length of stay was 6.9 days (SD 4.6).The post-operative improvement in garden alignment index (GAI) was a mean of 9.1° (p < 0.001) on lateral view. The mean femoral neck shortening was 1.97 mm (SD 5.3) at 3 months. There were no intra-operative complications. Post-operatively, 1 (2 %) patient required blood transfusion, 1 (2 %) patient had implant cut-out and non-union managed non-operatively, 2 (4 %) patients developed avascular necrosis and required revision to total hip replacements. There were two (4 %) cases of 1-year mortality.

Conclusion

The FNS achieved good outcomes with low rates of complications. The promising results justify its continued use and further evaluation in comparison to other devices.

Fixation of femoral neck fracture with femoral neck system: a retrospective cohort study of 43 patients

BACKGROUNDS

This study aimed to analyze the clinical outcomes of femoral neck fractures (FNF) in patients treated with a femoral neck system (FNS, DePuy Synthes), which is a recently introduced device.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study of 43 patients who underwent osteosynthesis using FNS for FNF between July 2019 and June 2021 with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. The researchers examined the patients' demographic factors and radiologically evaluated the fracture type and fixation status, bone union, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Of 43 patients, 25 were female, and the patients' mean age and body mass index were 62.1 years and 22.5 kg/m2, respectively. According to the Association of Osteosynthesis/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification, the most common fracture types were 31B1.1 and B1.2 (13 cases each), followed by B2.3, B2.1, and B2.2 (seven, five, and four cases, respectively). Radiological bone union was confirmed in 39 patients (90.7%), and the mean time to union was 3.6 months. Two cases of nonunion, one case of lag screw cut-out, and one case of osteonecrosis were confirmed; all four cases later underwent arthroplasty. The mean time to reoperation was 4.5 months. Meanwhile, five patients underwent implant removal after the bone union, and distal locking screw stripping was noted in three patients. All three patients required metal plate cutting to remove the implants.

CONCLUSIONS

Osteosynthesis of FNF using the newly introduced FNS showed favorable clinical outcomes and no specific hardware-related complications were reported during the follow-up. However, attention must be paid to the issue regarding distal locking screw failure during hardware removal.

Restoration of Hip Geometry after Femoral Neck Fracture: A Comparison of the Femoral Neck System (FNS) and the Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS)

BACKGROUND

The femoral neck system (FNS) was introduced as a minimally invasive fixation device for managing femoral neck fractures.

OBJECTIVE

To compare radiographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of femoral neck fracture patients following FNS compared to dynamic hip screw (DHS) implantation combined with an anti-rotational screw.

METHODS

Patients who underwent closed reduction and internal fixation of a femoral neck fracture between 2020 and 2022 were retrospectively included. We measured leg length, femoral offset, and centrum-collum-diaphyseal (CCD) angle in plain radiographs. Scar length, Harris Hip Score, short-form health survey 36-item score (SF-36), and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) were assessed during follow-up visits.

RESULTS

We included 43 patients (22 females) with a median age of 66 (IQR 57, 75). In both groups, leg length differences between the injured and the contralateral side increased, and femoral offset and CCD angle differences were maintained over time. FNS patients had shorter scars and reported fewer emotional problems and more energy. There were no differences between groups regarding the remaining SF-36 sub-scores, Harris Hip Score, and NRS.

CONCLUSIONS

The FNS allows for a comparable leg length, femoral offset, and CCD angle reconstruction while achieving similarly high functional and global health scores to the DHS.

Survivability of the Femoral Neck System for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adults

INTRODUCTION

Hip fractures are common injuries in the elderly, with an incidence that continues to rise. The femoral neck system (FNS) recently emerged as a novel treatment option for femoral neck fractures, but long-term survivability of the implant remains uncertain. The purpose of this study is to evaluate survivability of the FNS and assess risk factors for implant failure.

METHODS

One hundred five adult patients who received the FNS (DePuy Synthes, Raynham, MA) for femoral neck fractures (AO/OTA 31B) were included. Surgeries were performed within a regional hospital system comprising 18 facilities. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 1 year. The primary outcome measures were cumulative incidence of implant failure and 1-year mortality, including risk factor analysis.

RESULTS

Twelve implants failed at a follow-up ranging from 17 days to 8 months, and 7 failed within 90 days. Cumulative incidence of implant failure was 2% at 30 days, 7% at 90 days, 12% at 6 months, and 13% at 1 year. Causes of implant failure included cut-out (n = 5), non-union (n = 4), peri-implant fracture (n = 2), and avascular necrosis (n = 1). Univariate Cox regression identified Pauwels type III fractures and an increasing AP Parker ratio as significant risk factors for failure. Pauwels type III fractures showed a 5.48 times higher risk compared to Pauwels types I & II. Every 10% increase in AP Parker ratio increased risk of failure by 2.39 times. The 1-year mortality rate was 21%, and univariate logistic regression identified age as the only risk factor (odds ratio = 3.71).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of implant failure and 1-year mortality rate in this study suggests that the FNS can provide reliable fixation compared to rates in the literature, but complications are not uncommon. Avoiding Pauwels type III fractures and optimizing implant placement appear crucial to preventing implant failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV.

Current Management of Hip Fracture

This Special Issue, entitled "Current Management of Hip Fracture", ran in the Medicina journal of MDPI's "Surgery" section, reports the findings of international studies regarding different aspects in the treatment of patients suffering a proximal femur fracture [...].

Neck of femur fractures treated with the femoral neck system: outcomes of one hundred and two patients and literature review

Introduction

The recently developed femoral neck system (FNS) for treatment of femoral neck fractures (FNF), comprises theoretical biomechanical advantages compared to other implants. The aim of this study was to validate the safety and to report outcomes of patients treated with the FNS.

Method

A retrospective multicentric analysis of patients treated by FNS with a minimum of three months of follow-up. Details analysed from three medical centres were operative duration, estimated blood loss, initial hospitalisation duration, fixation quality as well as complications and reoperation rate. Patients who had revision surgery were compared to all other patients to identify risk factors for failure. In addition, a literature review was performed to analyse data on FNS clinical implementation and patient’s outcomes. The two data sets were combined and analysed.

Results

One-hundred and two patients were included in this study cohort with an average follow-up of seven months (range 3–27). Ten papers were included in the literature review, reporting data on 278 patients. Overall, 380 patients were analysed. Average age was 62.6 years, 52% of the fractures were classified as Gardens 1–2. Overall, the revision rate was 9.2% (14 patients diagnosed with cut-out of implant, 10 with AVN, 8 with non-union and 8 with hardware removal). For the 102 patients in the cohort risk factors for reoperation included patients age, surgeon seniority and inadequate placement of the implant.

Conclusion

This study shows that FNS is a safe treatment option for FNF. Intra-operative parameters and failure rates are comparable to previously reported rates for this implant and other frequently used implants.