Usefulness of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Indirect Decompression for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review

Clinical Outcomes of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Percutaneous Pedicle Screw for Dialysis-Related Spondyloarthropathy

Background: The usefulness and problems with lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with a percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) for dialysis-related spondyloarthropathy are not clear. Therefore, we investigated the usefulness and problems with LLIF with PPS in dialysis-related spondyloarthropathy. Methods: In total, 77 patients who underwent LLIF with PPS were divided into two groups: the dialysis-related spondyloarthropathy group ("Group D") consisted of 15 patients (10 males and 5 females) with a mean age of 70.4 years and a mean duration of hemodialysis of 10.8 years; and the lumbar degenerative disease group ("Group L") included 62 patients (31 males and 31 females) with a mean age of 71.0 years. The mean follow-up period was 4 years in Group D and 3 years 9 months in Group L. We compared surgical invasiveness (operative time, blood loss), perioperative complications, clinical outcomes (Improvement ratio of the JOA score), bone fusion rate, reoperation, sagittal alignment, and coronal imbalance between the two groups. Results: There were no significant differences in operative time, blood loss, or the improvement ratio of the JOA score, but dialysis-related spondyloarthropathy was observed in one patient with superficial infection, three patients with endplate failure, and one patient with restenosis due to cage subsidence. Conclusions: We consider LLIF with PPS for dialysis-related spondyloarthropathy to be an effective treatment option because its surgical invasiveness and clinical outcomes were comparable to those for cases of lumbar degenerative disease. However, as endplate failure due to bone fragility and a reduced bone fusion rate were observed in dialysis spondylolisthesis cases, we advise a careful selection of indications for indirect decompression as well as the application of suitable pre- and postoperative adjuvant therapies.

Effect of Unintended Tissue Injury on the Development of Thigh Symptoms After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity: A Retrospective Case Series

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective case series.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the effects of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF)-induced unintended tissue damage, including cage subsidence, cage malposition, and hematoma in the psoas major muscle, on the development of thigh symptoms.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Thigh symptoms are the most frequent complications after LLIF and are assumed to be caused by lumbar plexus compression and/or direct injury to the psoas major muscle. However, the causes and risk factors of thigh symptoms are yet to be fully understood.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult patients with spinal deformity who underwent two-stage surgery using LLIF and a posterior open fusion for the first and second stages, respectively, were included. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were routinely performed after LLIF before posterior surgery to investigate cage subsidence, cage malposition, and hematoma in the psoas muscle. We evaluated the development of thigh symptoms after LLIF and examined the effects of tissue injury on the occurrence of thigh symptoms. The differences in demographics and surgical and tissue damage parameters were compared between the groups with and without thigh symptoms using unpaired t tests and chi-squared tests. Factors associated with the development of thigh symptoms and muscle weakness were also assessed using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 130 patients [17 men and 113 women; mean age, 68.7 (range, 47-84)] were included. Thigh symptoms were observed in 52 (40.0%) patients, including muscle weakness and contralateral side symptoms in 20 (15.4%) and 9 (17.3%) patients, respectively. The factors significantly associated with thigh symptoms identified after multiple logistic regression analysis included hematoma (odds ratio: 2.27, 95% CI, 1.03-5.01) and approach from the right side (odds ratio: 2.64, 95% CI, 1.21-5.75). The presence of cage malposition was the only significant factor associated with muscle weakness (odds ratio: 4.12, 95% CI, 1.37-12.4).

CONCLUSIONS

We found unintended tissue injury during LLIF was associated with thigh symptoms. We found that hematoma in the psoas major muscle and cage malposition were the factors associated with thigh symptoms and muscle weakness, respectively.

Minimally Invasive Approach for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Lateral Single-Position Surgery with Intraoperative Computed Tomography Navigation and Fluoroscopy: A Technical Note

OBJECTIVE

Degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) is a prevalent condition that leads to low back pain and neurological symptoms. This technical note presents a novel surgical strategy for treating DS using lateral single-position surgery (SPS) in combination with intraoperative computed tomography navigation and fluoroscopy.

METHODS

Fifteen patients (5 males and 10 females, mean age 70.2 years) diagnosed with DS with a slip of 5 mm or more underwent lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) fixation using this technique. The procedure involved slip reduction using an upside PPS and rod fixation, followed by LLIF performed in the same lateral position. The term "upside PPS" refers to a PPS that is inserted on the ceiling side of the patient's surgical field. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic assessments were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the lateral SPS.

RESULTS

The results demonstrated significant improvements in various parameters, including spondylolisthesis reduction, segmental lordosis, disc height, and spinal canal dimensions. The lateral-SPS procedure exhibited several advantages over traditional flip LLIF approaches for slip reduction. Additionally, the technique provided accurate intraoperative navigation guidance through computed tomography imaging, ensuring precise implant placement and slip reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining LLIF and PPS fixation in a single procedure presents a precise, efficient approach for DS treatment, minimizing repositioning needs. This technique enables effective lumbar reconstruction, restoration of spinal stability, and improved patient outcomes. Although further investigation is warranted, lateral SPS surgery may hold promise as an innovative solution for managing DS by reducing surgical invasiveness and optimizing surgical efficiency.

Clinical Outcome of Full Endoscopic Trans Kambin's Triangle Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review

Full-endoscopic (FE) lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) is now a widely used type of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Although FE-LIF includes LIF with foraminoplasty via a Kambin's triangle approach (FE-KLIF) and LIF with foraminotomy via an interlaminar approach, these techniques are rarely discussed separately. This review evaluates the outcomes and complications of FE-KLIF reported in the literature. The PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies reporting the outcomes of FE-KLIF. Of 464 publications assessed, 11 met our inclusion criteria. Although the most frequently treated level was L4/5, L5/S1 was also treated. FE-KLIF was performed under local anesthesia and sedation or under epidural anesthesia without general anesthesia. Visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores were improved postoperatively in all uncontrolled studies; however, there was no significant difference in these scores in studies that compared FE-KLIF with posterior LIF (PLIF) or MIS-transforaminal LIF (TLIF). There was also no significant difference in the fusion rate between FE-KLIF and PLIF or MIS-TLIF. In terms of complications, although there were no reports of hematoma, dural tear and surgical site infection were reported in 1 paper each, with transient nerve disorders reported in 5 studies (frequency, 1.8%-23.5%). This review indicates that FE-KLIF is a feasible and viable surgical option for lumbar degenerative disease. However, the amount and level of evidence is low for the studies included in this review, and the data on long-term outcomes remain limited.

Effect of bone cement-reinforced pedicle screws combined with fusion repositioning therapy on lumbar spine function and postoperative complications in patients with severe lumbar spondylolisthesis

Objective

To retrospectively study the efficacy of bone cement-enhanced pedicle screws combined with interbody fusion reduction in the treatment of severe lumbar spondylolisthesis, its effect on lumbar function and complications.

Methods

From January 2019 to June 2021, 82 cases of severe lumbar spondylolisthesis in our hospital were analyzed. According to the different treatment plans, the patients were divided into two groups: A and B, in which group A patients were treated with pedicle screws combined with fusion and reduction, and group B patients were treated with bone cement reinforced pedicle screws combined with fusion and reduction. Perioperative indexes, pain severity (VAS), Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI), and low back and leg pain score of Japan Orthopedic Association (JOA), spondylolisthesis reduction, intervertebral space height, intervertebral foramen height, complications, and screw loosening were compared between the two groups.

Results

There was no significant difference in the amount of intraoperative bleeding between group A and group B (P > 0.05). The operation time of group B was longer than that of group A, and the hospitalization time was shorter than that of group A. The vertebral fusion rate of group B was higher than that of group A (P < 0.05). The VAS, ODI and JOA scores at the last follow-up in both groups were lower than those before surgery, and group B was lower than group A (P < 0.05). Compared with the preoperative period, the postoperative slippage degree grading improved in both groups, while the improvement rate in group B was higher than that in group A (P < 0.05). At the last follow-up, the scores of intervertebral foramen height and intervertebral space height in both groups were higher than those before operation, and those in group B were higher than those in group A (P < 0.05). There was no difference in the incidence of complications and screw loosening between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with conventional screw treatment, bone cement-reinforced pedicle screws combined with fusion repositioning can further improve the repositioning rate of slipped vertebrae in the treatment of severe LSL, while achieving a better intervertebral fusion rate. Therefore, the treatment of severe LSL with bone cement reinforced pedicle fusion and reduction is a safe and effective method.

Foraminoplasty with Partial Pediculectomy in Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Cases with Nerve Compression

BACKGROUND

Degenerative spondylolisthesis refers to a forward displacement of a vertebra relative to the underlying vertebra. Patients with radicular pain and/or neurogenic claudication are considered suitable candidates for surgical intervention. The aim of this study was to present clinical results of dynamic stabilization applied after pediculectomy and neural foramen enlargement in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and normal spinal sagittal balance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients who underwent pediculectomy and dynamic stabilization for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis were retrospectively identified. Diagnosis was made with detailed neurological and radiological imaging examinations for the anatomical location of the pain. Demographic data, visual analog scale scores, and quality-of-life scores were obtained.

RESULTS

Patients included 3 (33.3%) men and 6 (66.7%) women with a mean age of 61.3 ± 13.0 years (range, 46-80 years) at initial symptom onset. Grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis was present in 5 (55.6%) patients, and grade 2 was present in 4 (44.4%) patients. Pathology was detected in L4-5 in 4 patients (44.4%) and L5-S1 in 5 patients (55.6%). In all patients, at the 3-month follow-up, statistically significant decrease in visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores was observed. At the last follow-up, no implant-related complications requiring revision were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients without any pathology in the sagittal balance, the optimal physiological treatment modality can be created by applying posterior dynamic stabilization together with pediculectomy to support the posterior tension band.

A Comparative Clinical Study of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion between Patients with Multiply Operated Back and Patients with First-Time Surgery

Background and Objectives: Patients with multiply operated back (MOB) may suffer from persistent lower-back pain associated with back muscle damage and epidural fibrosis following repeated back surgery (Failed Back Spinal Syndrome). Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is considered to be favorable for MOB patients. However, little scientific research has been carried out for this issue due to variety of the pathogenesis. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical results of MOB patients and first-time surgery patients who underwent LLIF for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative scoliosis and/or degenerative spondylolisthesis (spinal instability). Materials and Methods: LLIF was performed for lumbar spinal stenosis with spinal instability in 55 consecutive cases of single hospital (30 males, 25 females, average age: 69). Clinical outcomes were compared between the MOB patient group (MOB group) and the first surgical patient group (F group). We evaluated the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores and JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) before and 2 years after surgery. MOB patients were defined as those who have had one or more lumbar surgery on the same intervertebral or adjacent vertebrae in the past. Results: There were 20 cases (12 males, 8 females, average age: 71) in MOB group, and 35 cases (19 males, 16 females, average age: 68) in the F group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, sex, number of intervertebral fixations, modic change in fused intervertebral end plate, score of brief scale for evaluation of psychiatric problem, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal vertical axis before and after surgery. The preoperative JOA scores averaged 12.5 points in the MOB group and averaged 11.6 points in the F group. The postoperative JOA scores averaged 23.9 points in the MOB group and averaged 24.7 points in the F group. The preoperative JOABPEQ averaged 36.3 points in the MOB group and averaged 35.4 points in the F group. The postoperative average JOA score was 75.4 in the MOB group and 70.2 in the F group. Conclusions: Based on the results, there was no significant difference in clinical outcomes of the two groups, and there was no new residual lower-back pain. Thus, we considered that LLIF one option for patients with MOB.