Accuracy and Reliability of Software Navigation for Acetabular Component Placement in THA: An In Vitro Validation Study

The accuracy of cup anteversion measurement on postoperative pelvic radiographs: A comparative retrospective cohort study between DDH and non-DDH patients

Rationale and objectives

Postoperative pelvic radiographs remain a vital tool for assessing cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty (THA), with the accuracy influenced by various factors. The objective of this study is to investigate the accuracy of cup anteversion measurement in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) patients and others based on postoperative pelvic radiographs conducted under the current heavy workload conditions.

Materials and methods

Patients who underwent THA at our hospital with both postoperative X-ray and CT images from January 2020 to December 2022 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Virtual X-ray films were generated using digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRR) technology from CT images, with pelvic position perfectly controlled. Radiographic anteversion (RA) was measured on 3D-CT, virtual X-rays, and actual postoperative X-rays, abbreviated as RA_3D, RA_DRR, and RA_Xray, respectively. A repeated-measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was utilized to evaluate the variations in RA within and between different groups across three methods. The Bland-Altman plot analysis showed the variations among methods in DDH and non-DDH patients, setting a clinically acceptable limits of agreement (LOA) at ±5°.

Results

This study included 154 hip cases, with 63 DDH and 91 other diseases. Repeated-measures ANCOVA revealed a descending trend in RA across three methods, with differences of 2.64° (DDH) vs. 2.74° (others) from 3D to DRR, and 4.89° (DDH) vs. 1.07° (others) from DRR to X-ray. The group by methods interaction effect were significant (p = 0.002). Significant statistical differences in RA_Xray (P = 0.035) were observed between DDH and non-DDH patients, but not in RA_3D and RA_DRR. Bland-Altman plots showed 71.4 % of DDH patients exceeded the clinically acceptable LOA, compared to 36.3 % of other patients.

Conclusion

Our study indicated that under the current intense workload, the reliability of assessing cup anteversion using postoperative pelvic radiographs is challenged, especially in patients with DDH.

Total Hip Arthroplasty-Current Challenges

In 1891, Professor Themistocles Glück in Germany was the first to replace a femoral head in hip joints destroyed by tuberculosis using ivory [...].

The Top Three Burning Questions in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) for end-stage osteoarthritis is one of the most effective surgical treatments in medicine. Impressive outcomes have been well documented in the literature with patients gaining ambulation and recovery of hip joint function. Nevertheless, there are still debatable issues and controversies that the orthopedic community has not been able to provide a definitive answer for. This review is focused on the current three most debatable issues surrounding the THA procedure: (1) new cutting-edge technology, (2) spinopelvic mobility, and (3) fast-track protocols. The scope of the herein narrative review is to analyze the debatable issues surrounding the three aforementioned topics and conclude the best contemporary clinical approaches regarding each issue.

Orthopedic Surgeons’ Accuracy When Orienting an Acetabular Cup. A Comparison with Untrained Individuals

Background and Objectives: Previous studies demonstrated a huge variability among surgeons when it comes to reproducing the position of an acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty. Our main objective is to determine if orthopedic surgeons can replicate a given orientation on a pelvic model better than untrained individuals. Our secondary objective is to determine if experience has any influence on their ability for this task. Materials and Methods: A group of specialist orthopedic hip surgeons and a group of volunteers with no medical training were asked to reproduce three given (randomly generated) acetabular cup orientations (inclination and anteversion) on a pelvic model. Error was measured by means of a hip navigation system and comparisons between groups were made using the appropriate statistical methods. Results: The study included 107 individuals, 36 orthopedic surgeons and 71 untrained volunteers. The mean error among surgeons was slightly greater as regards both inclination (7.84 ± 5.53 vs. 6.70 ± 4.03) and anteversion (5.85 ± 4.52 vs. 5.48 ± 3.44), although statistical significance was not reached (p = 0.226 and p = 0.639, respectively). Similarly, although surgeons with more than 100 procedures a year obtained better results than those with less surgical experience (8.01 vs. 7.67 degrees of error in inclination and 5.83 vs. 5.87 in anteversion), this difference was not statistically significant, either (p = 0.852 and p = 0.981). Conclusions: No differences were found in the average error made by orthopedic surgeons and untrained individuals. Furthermore, the surgeons’ cup orientation accuracy was not seen to improve significantly with experience.

Relationship between the Accuracy of the Acetabular Cup Angle and BMI in Posterolateral Total Hip Arthroplasty with CT-Based Navigation

Background and Objectives: Precise acetabular cup placement is essential for successful total hip arthroplasty (THA). In obese patients, its accuracy is often difficult to achieve because of the thickness of the soft tissues. This study aimed to determine the relationship between the accuracy of acetabular cup angle and body mass index (BMI) in posterolateral THA using the computed tomography-based navigation (CT-navi) system. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 145 consecutive primary THAs using the CT-navi system between January 2015 and January 2018. All surgeries were performed using cementless cups employing the posterolateral approach with the patient in the decubitus position. We compared the radiographic inclination and anteversion obtained intraoperatively from the CT-navi with those measured by postoperative CT using three-dimensional templating software. We evaluated the relationship between the extent of errors and correlation with BMI. Results: In non-overweight patients (BMI < 25, 88 hips), the mean navigation errors for inclination were 2.8 ± 2.2° and for anteversion were 2.6 ± 2.3°. Meanwhile, in overweight patients (BMI ≥ 25, 57 hips), the mean navigation errors were 2.6 ± 2.4° for inclination and 2.4 ± 2.4° for anteversion. We found no significant difference between overweight and non-overweight patients in both inclination and anteversion. There was no correlation between the extent of errors and BMI. Conclusions: In posterolateral THA, CT-navi can aid the precise placement of the acetabular cup irrespective of a patient’s BMI.