|
1
|
Ronsini C, Solazzo MC, Braca E, Andreoli G, Vastarella MG, Cianci S, Capozzi VA, Torella M, Cobellis L, De Franciscis P. Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Neoadjuvant Treatment versus Standard Radio-Chemotherapy-An Updated Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2542. [PMID: 39061182 PMCID: PMC11275180 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16142542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2024] [Revised: 07/10/2024] [Accepted: 07/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment of choice for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is definitive concurrent radio chemotherapy which consists of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy (CCRT), with the possible addition of brachytherapy (BT). However, the benefits of adjuvant surgery after neoadjuvant treatments remain a debated issue and a still open question in the literature. This meta-analysis aims to provide an updated view on the controversial topic, focusing on comparing surgery after any adjuvant treatment and standard treatment. METHODS Following the recommendations in the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement, the PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched in April 2023 for early publications. No limitations on the country were applied. Only English articles were considered. The comparative studies containing data about disease-free survival (DFS) and/or overall survival (OS) were included in the meta-analysis. RESULTS The CCRT + surgery group showed a significantly better DFS than CCRT (RR 0.69 [95% CI 0.58-0.81] p < 0.01) and a better OS (RR 0.70 [95% CI 0.55-0.89] p < 0.01). Nine studies comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) plus surgery and CCRT were also enrolled. The NACT + surgery group showed a significantly better DFS than CCRT (RR 0.66 [95% CI 0.45-0.97] p < 0.01) and a better OS (RR 0.56 [95% CI 0.38-0.83] p < 0.01). In the sub-analysis of three randomized control trials, the surgery group documented a non-significantly better DFS and OS than CCRT (OR 1.10 [95% CI 0.67-1.80] p = 0.72; I2 = 69% p = 0.72; OR 1.09 [95% CI 0.63-1.91] p = 0.75; I2 = 13% p = 0.32). CONCLUSION The results provide updated findings about the efficacy of neoadjuvant treatments, indicating significantly improved DFS and OS in patients undergoing hysterectomy after CCRT or NACT compared with patients undergoing standard treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Ronsini
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.C.S.); (E.B.); (G.A.); (M.G.V.); (M.T.); (L.C.); (P.D.F.)
| | - Maria Cristina Solazzo
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.C.S.); (E.B.); (G.A.); (M.G.V.); (M.T.); (L.C.); (P.D.F.)
| | - Eleonora Braca
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.C.S.); (E.B.); (G.A.); (M.G.V.); (M.T.); (L.C.); (P.D.F.)
| | - Giada Andreoli
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.C.S.); (E.B.); (G.A.); (M.G.V.); (M.T.); (L.C.); (P.D.F.)
| | - Maria Giovanna Vastarella
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.C.S.); (E.B.); (G.A.); (M.G.V.); (M.T.); (L.C.); (P.D.F.)
| | - Stefano Cianci
- Department of Woman and Child Health, IRCCS, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli, 00136 Rome, Italy; (S.C.); (V.A.C.)
| | - Vito Andrea Capozzi
- Department of Woman and Child Health, IRCCS, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli, 00136 Rome, Italy; (S.C.); (V.A.C.)
| | - Marco Torella
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.C.S.); (E.B.); (G.A.); (M.G.V.); (M.T.); (L.C.); (P.D.F.)
| | - Luigi Cobellis
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.C.S.); (E.B.); (G.A.); (M.G.V.); (M.T.); (L.C.); (P.D.F.)
| | - Pasquale De Franciscis
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.C.S.); (E.B.); (G.A.); (M.G.V.); (M.T.); (L.C.); (P.D.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Tanaka T, Nishie R, Murakami H, Tsuchihashi H, Toji A, Ueda S, Morita N, Hashida S, Terada S, Maruoka H, Taniguchi K, Komura K, Ohmichi M. Oncologic Outcomes of Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3981. [PMID: 38999545 PMCID: PMC11242828 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Revised: 05/28/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: The sentinel lymph node is the first node that cancer cells reach when migrating from the primary site. However, oncological outcomes after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) have not been reported for cervical cancer. In this study, oncological outcomes were compared between patients receiving SNB and pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLD) for early-stage cervical cancer. Methods: One hundred and four patients with clinical stage 1A2, 1B1, and 2A1 cervical cancer were included in this study. All patients underwent laparoscopic or robot-assisted radical hysterectomy with SNB or PLD. Fifty-two patients with tumors ≤2 cm underwent SNB. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the groups. Results: The median (interquartile range) tumor size was 12 (7-20) mm in the SNB group and 20 (13-25) mm in the PLD group. Lymph node metastasis occurred in one patient in the SNB group and in nine patients in the PLD group. The median follow-up periods were 42 (24-60) and 82 (19-101) months in the SNB group and PLD group, respectively. The 3-year DFS rates were 100% in SNB and 91.5% in PLD. The 3-year OS was 100% in both groups. Conclusions: SNB was sufficient in cervical cancer patients with tumors ≤2 cm, suggesting that PLD might not be necessary for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomohito Tanaka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (R.N.); (H.M.); (H.T.); (A.T.); (S.U.); (N.M.); (S.H.); (S.T.); (H.M.); (M.O.)
- Center for Medical Research & Development, Division of Translational Research, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (K.T.); (K.K.)
| | - Ruri Nishie
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (R.N.); (H.M.); (H.T.); (A.T.); (S.U.); (N.M.); (S.H.); (S.T.); (H.M.); (M.O.)
| | - Hikaru Murakami
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (R.N.); (H.M.); (H.T.); (A.T.); (S.U.); (N.M.); (S.H.); (S.T.); (H.M.); (M.O.)
| | - Hiromitsu Tsuchihashi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (R.N.); (H.M.); (H.T.); (A.T.); (S.U.); (N.M.); (S.H.); (S.T.); (H.M.); (M.O.)
| | - Akihiko Toji
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (R.N.); (H.M.); (H.T.); (A.T.); (S.U.); (N.M.); (S.H.); (S.T.); (H.M.); (M.O.)
| | - Shoko Ueda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (R.N.); (H.M.); (H.T.); (A.T.); (S.U.); (N.M.); (S.H.); (S.T.); (H.M.); (M.O.)
| | - Natsuko Morita
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (R.N.); (H.M.); (H.T.); (A.T.); (S.U.); (N.M.); (S.H.); (S.T.); (H.M.); (M.O.)
| | - Sousuke Hashida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (R.N.); (H.M.); (H.T.); (A.T.); (S.U.); (N.M.); (S.H.); (S.T.); (H.M.); (M.O.)
| | - Shinichi Terada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (R.N.); (H.M.); (H.T.); (A.T.); (S.U.); (N.M.); (S.H.); (S.T.); (H.M.); (M.O.)
| | - Hiroshi Maruoka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (R.N.); (H.M.); (H.T.); (A.T.); (S.U.); (N.M.); (S.H.); (S.T.); (H.M.); (M.O.)
| | - Kohei Taniguchi
- Center for Medical Research & Development, Division of Translational Research, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (K.T.); (K.K.)
| | - Kazumasa Komura
- Center for Medical Research & Development, Division of Translational Research, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (K.T.); (K.K.)
| | - Masahide Ohmichi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki 569-8686, Osaka, Japan; (R.N.); (H.M.); (H.T.); (A.T.); (S.U.); (N.M.); (S.H.); (S.T.); (H.M.); (M.O.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Dicu-Andreescu IG, Marincaș MA, Simionescu AA, Dicu-Andreescu I, Ionescu SO, Prunoiu VM, Brătucu E, Simion L. The Role of Lymph Node Downstaging Following Neoadjuvant Treatment in a Group of Patients with Advanced Stage Cervical Cancer. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:871. [PMID: 38929488 PMCID: PMC11205351 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60060871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Cervical cancer is the fourth most frequent type of neoplasia in women. It is most commonly caused by the persistent infection with high-risk strands of human papillomavirus (hrHPV). Its incidence increases rapidly from age 25 when routine HPV screening starts and then decreases at the age of 45. This reflects both the diagnosis of prevalent cases at first-time screening and the likely peak of HPV exposure in early adulthood. For early stages, the treatment offers the possibility of fertility preservation.. However, in more advanced stages, the treatment is restricted to concomitant chemo-radiotherapy, combined, in very selected cases with surgical intervention. After the neoadjuvant treatment, an imagistic re-evaluation of the patients is carried out to analyze if the stage of the disease remained the same or suffered a downstaging. Lymph node downstaging following neoadjuvant treatment is regarded as an indubitable prognostic factor for predicting disease recurrence and survival in patients with advanced cervical cancer. This study aims to ascertain the important survival role of radiotherapy in the downstaging of the disease and of lymphadenectomy in the control of lymph node invasion for patients with advanced-stage cervical cancer. Material and Methods: We describe the outcome of patients with cervical cancer in stage IIIC1 FIGO treated at Bucharest Oncological Institute. All patients received radiotherapy and two-thirds received concomitant chemotherapy. A surgical intervention consisting of type C radical hysterectomy with radical pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed six to eight weeks after the end of the neoadjuvant treatment. Results: The McNemar test demonstrated the regression of lymphadenopathies after neoadjuvant treatment-p: <0.001. However, the persistence of adenopathies was not related to the dose of irradiation (p: 0.61), the number of sessions of radiotherapy (p: 0.80), or the chemotherapy (p: 0.44). Also, there were no significant differences between the adenopathies reported by imagistic methods and those identified during surgical intervention-p: 0.62. The overall survival evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves is dependent on the post-radiotherapy FIGO stage-p: 0.002 and on the lymph node status evaluated during surgical intervention-p: 0.04. The risk factors associated with an increased risk of death were represented by a low preoperative hemoglobin level (p: 0.003) and by the advanced FIGO stage determined during surgical intervention (p-value: 0.006 for stage IIIA and 0.01 for stage IIIC1). In the multivariate Cox model, the independent predictor of survival was the preoperative hemoglobin level (p: 0.004, HR 0.535, CI: 0.347 to 0.823). Out of a total of 33 patients with neoadjuvant treatment, 22 survived until the end of the study, all 33 responded to the treatment in varying degrees, but in 3 of them, tumor cells were found in the lymph nodes during the intraoperative histopathological examination. Conclusions: For advanced cervical cancer patients, radical surgery after neoadjuvant treatment may be associated with a better survival rate. Further research is needed to identify all the causes that lead to the persistence of adenopathies in certain patients, to decrease the FIGO stage after surgical intervention, and, therefore, to lower the risk of death. Also, it is mandatory to correctly evaluate and treat the anemia, as it seems to be an independent predictor factor for mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irinel-Gabriel Dicu-Andreescu
- Clinical Department No 10, General Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy ”Carol Davila”, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (I.-G.D.-A.)
- Department of Oncological Surgery, Oncological Institute ”Prof. Dr. Alexandru Trestioreanu”, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Marian-Augustin Marincaș
- Clinical Department No 10, General Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy ”Carol Davila”, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (I.-G.D.-A.)
- Department of Oncological Surgery, Oncological Institute ”Prof. Dr. Alexandru Trestioreanu”, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Anca-Angela Simionescu
- Clinical Department No 10, General Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy ”Carol Davila”, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (I.-G.D.-A.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Filantropia Clinical Hospital, 011171 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ioana Dicu-Andreescu
- Clinical Department No 10, General Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy ”Carol Davila”, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (I.-G.D.-A.)
| | - Sînziana-Octavia Ionescu
- Clinical Department No 10, General Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy ”Carol Davila”, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (I.-G.D.-A.)
- Department of Oncological Surgery, Oncological Institute ”Prof. Dr. Alexandru Trestioreanu”, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Virgiliu-Mihail Prunoiu
- Clinical Department No 10, General Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy ”Carol Davila”, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (I.-G.D.-A.)
- Department of Oncological Surgery, Oncological Institute ”Prof. Dr. Alexandru Trestioreanu”, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Eugen Brătucu
- Clinical Department No 10, General Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy ”Carol Davila”, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (I.-G.D.-A.)
- Department of Oncological Surgery, Oncological Institute ”Prof. Dr. Alexandru Trestioreanu”, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Laurențiu Simion
- Clinical Department No 10, General Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy ”Carol Davila”, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (I.-G.D.-A.)
- Department of Oncological Surgery, Oncological Institute ”Prof. Dr. Alexandru Trestioreanu”, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Ronsini C, Napolitano S, Iavarone I, Fumiento P, Vastarella MG, Reino A, Molitierno R, Cobellis L, De Franciscis P, Cianci S. The Role of Adjuvant Therapy for the Treatment of Micrometastases in Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1496. [PMID: 38592342 PMCID: PMC10932314 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Revised: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer is the most incident gynecological cancer. Lymph node dissemination is one of the most important factors for the patient's prognosis. Pelvic lymph nodes are the primary site of extra-uterine dissemination in endometrial cancer (EC), setting the 5-year survival to 44-52%. It is standard practice for radiation therapy (RT) and/or chemotherapy (CTX) to be given as adjuvant treatments to prevent the progression of micrometastases. Also, administration of EC patients with RT and/or CTX regimens before surgery may decrease micrometastases, hence the need for lymphadenectomy. The primary aim of the systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess whether adjuvant RT and/or CTX improve oncological outcomes through the management of micrometastases and nodal recurrence. We performed systematic research using the string "Endometrial Neoplasms" [Mesh] AND "Lymphatic Metastasis/therapy" [Mesh]. The methods for this study were specified a priori based on the recommendations in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Outcomes were 5-year overall survival, progression-free survival, recurrence rate, and complications rate. We assessed the quality of studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). A total of 1682 patients with stage I-to-IV EC were included. Adjuvant treatment protocols involved external-beam RT, brachytherapy, and CTX either alone or in combination. The no-treatment group showed a non-statistically significant higher recurrence risk than any adjuvant treatment group (OR 1.39 [95% CI 0.68-2.85] p = 0.36). The no-treatment group documented a non-statistically significant higher risk of death than those who underwent any adjuvant treatment (RR 1.47 [95% CI 0.44-4.89] p = 0.53; I2 = 55% p = 0.000001). Despite the fact that early-stage EC may show micrometastases, adjuvant treatment is not significantly associated with better survival outcomes, and the combination of EBRT and CTX is the most valid option in the early stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Ronsini
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (I.I.); (P.F.); (M.G.V.); (A.R.); (R.M.); (L.C.); (P.D.F.)
| | - Stefania Napolitano
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| | - Irene Iavarone
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (I.I.); (P.F.); (M.G.V.); (A.R.); (R.M.); (L.C.); (P.D.F.)
| | - Pietro Fumiento
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (I.I.); (P.F.); (M.G.V.); (A.R.); (R.M.); (L.C.); (P.D.F.)
| | - Maria Giovanna Vastarella
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (I.I.); (P.F.); (M.G.V.); (A.R.); (R.M.); (L.C.); (P.D.F.)
| | - Antonella Reino
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (I.I.); (P.F.); (M.G.V.); (A.R.); (R.M.); (L.C.); (P.D.F.)
| | - Rossella Molitierno
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (I.I.); (P.F.); (M.G.V.); (A.R.); (R.M.); (L.C.); (P.D.F.)
| | - Lugi Cobellis
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (I.I.); (P.F.); (M.G.V.); (A.R.); (R.M.); (L.C.); (P.D.F.)
| | - Pasquale De Franciscis
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (I.I.); (P.F.); (M.G.V.); (A.R.); (R.M.); (L.C.); (P.D.F.)
| | - Stefano Cianci
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Women Wealth Area, Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00136 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Margioula-Siarkou C, Almperis A, Gullo G, Almperi EA, Margioula-Siarkou G, Nixarlidou E, Mponiou K, Papakotoulas P, Sardeli C, Guyon F, Dinas K, Petousis S. Sentinel Lymph Node Staging in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Comprehensive Review. J Clin Med 2023; 13:27. [PMID: 38202034 PMCID: PMC10779478 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13010027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Cervical cancer (CC) continues to be a significant global public health concern, even with preventive measures in place. In women with early-stage CC, the status of lymph nodes is of paramount importance, not only for the final prognosis but also for determining the best therapeutic strategy. According to main international guidelines, pelvic full lymphadenectomy (PLND) is recommended for lymph node staging. However, in these early stages of CC, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has emerged as a precise technique for evaluating lymph node involvement, improving its morbidity profile. We performed a literature review through PubMed articles about progress on the application of SLNB in women with early-stage CC focusing on the comparison with PET/CT and PLND in terms of oncological outcomes and diagnostic accuracy. While the superiority of SLNB is clear compared to radiologic modalities, it demonstrates no clear oncologic inferiority over PLND, given the higher detection rate of positive lymph nodes and predominance of no lymph node recurrences. However, due to a lack of prospective evidence, particularly concerning long-term oncological safety, SLNB is not the current gold standard. With careful patient selection and adherence to straightforward protocols, a low false-negative rate can be ensured. The aim of the ongoing prospective trials is to address these issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chrysoula Margioula-Siarkou
- 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Aristarchos Almperis
- 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Giuseppe Gullo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy
| | - Emmanouela-Aliki Almperi
- 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Georgia Margioula-Siarkou
- 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Eleni Nixarlidou
- 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Konstantina Mponiou
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Theageneio Anticancer Hospital, 546 39 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Pavlos Papakotoulas
- 1st Medical Oncology Unit, Theageneio Anticancer Hospital, 546 39 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Chrysanthi Sardeli
- Department of Pharmacology & Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Frederic Guyon
- Gynaecologic Oncology Unit, Institut Bergonie, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Konstantinos Dinas
- 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Stamatios Petousis
- 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Ronsini C, Solazzo MC, Molitierno R, De Franciscis P, Pasanisi F, Cobellis L, Colacurci N. Fertility-Sparing Treatment for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer ≥ 2 cm: Can One Still Effectively Become a Mother? A Systematic Review of Fertility Outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:5587-5596. [PMID: 37261562 PMCID: PMC10409841 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13542-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fertility-sparing treatments (FSTs) have played a crucial role in the management of early-stage cervical cancer (ECC); however, there is currently no standard of care for women with ECC ≥ 2 cm who wish to preserve their fertility. The current orientation of the scientific community comprises upfront surgical techniques and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by minor surgery such us conization. However these approaches are not standardized. This systematic review aimed to collect the evidence in the literature regarding the obstetric outcomes of the different techniques for applying FSTs in ECC ≥ 2 cm. METHODS A systematic review was performed in September 2022 using the Pubmed and Scopus databases, from the date of the first publication. We included all studies containing data regarding pregnancy, birth, and preterm rates. RESULTS Fifteen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and 352 patients were analyzed regarding fertility outcomes. Surgery-based FST showed the pregnancy rate (22%), birth rate (11%), and preterm rate (10%). Papers regarding FST using the NACT approach showed a pregnancy rate of 44%, with a birth rate of 45% in patients who managed to get pregnant. The preterm rate amounted to 44%, and pregnancy rates and birth rates were significantly different between the two groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Fertility preservation in patients with ECC > 2 cm is challenging. The endpoint for evaluating the best treatment should include oncological and fertility outcomes together. From this prospective, NACT followed by less radical surgery could be a reasonable compromise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Ronsini
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
| | - M C Solazzo
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - R Molitierno
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - P De Franciscis
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - F Pasanisi
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - L Cobellis
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - N Colacurci
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Gao Y, Liu H, Wan J, Chang F, Zhang L, Wang W, Zhang Q, Feng Q. Construction and Assessment of a Prognostic Risk Model for Cervical Cancer Based on Lactate Metabolism-Related lncRNAs. Int J Gen Med 2023; 16:2943-2960. [PMID: 37457750 PMCID: PMC10349608 DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s411511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Cervical cancer (CC) has the fourth highest incidence and mortality rate among female cancers. Lactate is a key regulator promoting tumor progression. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are closely associated with cervical cancer (CC). The study was aimed to develop a prognostic risk model for cervical cancer based on lactate metabolism-associated lncRNAs and to determine their clinical prognostic value. Patients and Methods In this study, CESC transcriptome data were obtained from the TCGA database. 262 lactate metabolism-associated genes were extracted from MsigDB (Molecular Characterization Database). Then, correlation analysis was used to identify LRLs. Univariate Cox regression analysis was performed afterwards, followed by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis and multiple Cox regression analysis. 10 lncRNAs were finally identified to construct a risk score model. They were divided into two groups of high risk and low risk according to the median of risk scores. The predictive performance of the models was assessed by Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis, subject work characteristics (ROC) analysis, and univariate and multivariate Cox analyses. To assess the clinical utility of the prognostic model, we performed functional enrichment analysis, immune microenvironment analysis, mutation analysis, and column line graph generation. Results We constructed a prognostic model consisting of 10 LRLs at CC. We observed that high-risk populations were strongly associated with poor survival outcomes. Risk score was an independent risk factor for CC prognosis and was strongly associated with immune microenvironment analysis and tumor mutational load. Conclusion We developed a risk model of lncRNAs associated with lactate metabolism and used it to predict prognosis of CC, which could guide and facilitate the progress of new treatment strategies and disease monitoring in CC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ya Gao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Hongyang Liu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Junhu Wan
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Key Clinical Laboratory of Henan Province, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Fenghua Chang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Lindong Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wenjuan Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qinshan Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Quanling Feng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|