1
|
Janahiraman S, Shahril NS, Jayaraj VJ, Ch'ng S, Eow LH, Mageswaren E, Lim AL, Chong HC, Ong PS, Ismail AM, Rahim SMA, Ng CR, Suahilai DM, Ramlan AH, Too CL, Leong CO. A hierarchical cluster analysis for clinical profiling of tofacitinib treatment response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 2024; 43:2489-2501. [PMID: 38922551 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-024-07035-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 05/19/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024]
Abstract
Tofacitinib is the first oral JAK inhibitor approved for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To enhance our understanding of tofacitinib drug response, we used hierarchical clustering to analyse the profiles of patient who responded to the treatment in a real-world setting. Patients who commenced on tofacitinib treatment were selected from 12 major rheumatology centres in Malaysia. The aim was to assess their response to tofacitinib defined as achieving DAS28-CRP/ESR ≤ 3.2 and DAS28 improvement > 1.2 at 12 weeks. A hierarchical clustering analysis was performed using sociodemographic and clinical parameters at baseline. All 163 RA patients were divided into three clusters (Clusters 1, 2 and 3) based on specific clinical factors at baseline including bone erosion, antibody positivity, disease activity and anaemia status. Cluster 1 consisted of RA patients without bone erosion, antibody negative, low baseline disease activity measure and absence of anaemia. Cluster 2 comprised of patients without bone erosion, RF positivity, anti-CCP negativity, moderate to high baseline disease activity score and absence of anaemia. Cluster 3 patients had bone erosion, antibody positivity, high baseline disease activity and anaemia. The response rates to tofacitinib varied among the clusters: Cluster 1 had a 79% response rate, Cluster 2 had a 66% response rate, and Cluster 3 had a 36% response rate. The differences in response rates between the three clusters were found to be statistically significant. This cluster analysis study indicates that patients who are seronegative and have low disease activity, absence of bone erosion and no signs of anaemia may have a higher likelihood of benefiting from tofacitinib therapy. By identifying clinical profiles that respond to tofacitinib treatment, we can improve treatment stratification yielding significant benefits and better health outcomes for individuals with RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sivakami Janahiraman
- School of Postgraduate Studies, IMU University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
- Department of Pharmacy, Hospital Selayang, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.
| | - Nor Shuhaila Shahril
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Hospital Putrajaya, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Putrajaya, Malaysia
| | - Vivek Jason Jayaraj
- Sector for Biostatistics & Data Repository, National Institutes of Health Complex, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
| | - Suyin Ch'ng
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Hospital Selayang, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
| | - Liu Hong Eow
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Hospital Tuanku Ja'afar Seremban, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
| | - Eashwary Mageswaren
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Hospital Tengku Ampuan Rahimah, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
| | - Ai Lee Lim
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Hospital Pulau Pinang, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
| | - Hwee Cheng Chong
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Hospital Melaka, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Melaka, Malaysia
| | - Ping Seung Ong
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia
| | - Asmahan Mohamed Ismail
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Hospital Raja Perempuan Zainab II, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Kelantan Darul Naim, Malaysia
| | - Siti Mariam Ab Rahim
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Hospital Sultanah Nur Zahirah, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Terengganu Darul Iman, Malaysia
| | - Chun Ruh Ng
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Hospital Sultan Ismail, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Johor Darul Ta'zim, Malaysia
| | - Dayang Masyrinartie Suahilai
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Pahang Darul Makmur, Malaysia
| | - Azwarina Hanim Ramlan
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Hospital Sultanah Bahiyah, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Kedah Darul Aman, Malaysia
| | - Chun Lai Too
- Immunogenetic Unit, Institute for Medical Research, National Institutes of Health Complex, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
| | - Chee Onn Leong
- Centre for Cancer and Stem Cell Research Development and Innovation (IRDI), Institute for Research, IMU University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- AGTC Genomics, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Paroli M, Becciolini A, Lo Gullo A, Parisi S, Bravi E, Andracco R, Nucera V, Ometto F, Lumetti F, Farina A, Del Medico P, Colina M, Ravagnani V, Scolieri P, Larosa M, Priora M, Visalli E, Addimanda O, Vitetta R, Volpe A, Bezzi A, Girelli F, Molica Colella AB, Caccavale R, Di Donato E, Adorni G, Santilli D, Lucchini G, Arrigoni E, Platè I, Mansueto N, Ianniello A, Fusaro E, Ditto MC, Bruzzese V, Camellino D, Bianchi G, Serale F, Foti R, Amato G, De Lucia F, Dal Bosco Y, Foti R, Reta M, Fiorenza A, Rovera G, Marchetta A, Focherini MC, Mascella F, Bernardi S, Sandri G, Giuggioli D, Salvarani C, De Andres MI, Franchina V, Molica Colella F, Ferrero G, Raffeiner B, Ariani A. Influence of Safety Warnings on the Prescribing Attitude of JAK Inhibitors for Rheumatoid Arthritis in Italy. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3929. [PMID: 38999494 PMCID: PMC11242683 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2024] [Revised: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) tofacitinib (TOFA), baricitinib (BARI), upadacitinib (UPA), and filgotinib (FILGO) are effective drugs for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. However, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) raised concerns about the safety of TOFA after its approval. This prompted the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to issue two safety warnings for limiting TOFA use, then extended a third warning to all JAKi in patients at high risk of developing serious adverse effects (SAE). These include thrombosis, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and cancer. The purpose of this work was to analyze how the first two safety warnings from the EMA affected the prescribing of JAKi by rheumatologists in Italy. Methods: All patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had been prescribed JAKi for the first time in a 36-month period from 1 July 2019, to 30 June 2022 were considered. Data were obtained from the medical records of 29 Italian tertiary referral rheumatology centers. Patients were divided into three groups of 4 months each, depending on whether the JAKi prescription had occurred before the EMA's first safety alert (1 July-31 October 2019, Group 1), between the first and second alerts (1 November 2019-29 February 2020, Group 2), or between the second and third alerts (1 March 2021-30 June 2021, Group 3). The percentages and absolute changes in the patients prescribed the individual JAKi were analyzed. Differences among the three groups of patients regarding demographic and clinical characteristics were also assessed. Results: A total of 864 patients were prescribed a JAKi during the entire period considered. Of these, 343 were identified in Group 1, 233 in Group 2, and 288 in Group 3. An absolute reduction of 32% was observed in the number of patients prescribed a JAKi between Group 1 and Group 2 and 16% between Group 1 and Group 3. In contrast, there was a 19% increase in the prescription of a JAKi in patients between Group 2 and Group 3. In the first group, BARI was the most prescribed drug (227 prescriptions, 66.2% of the total), followed by TOFA (115, 33.5%) and UPA (1, 0.3%). In the second group, the most prescribed JAKi was BARI (147, 63.1%), followed by TOFA (65, 27.9%) and UPA (33, 11.5%). In the third group, BARI was still the most prescribed JAKi (104 prescriptions, 36.1%), followed by UPA (89, 30.9%), FILGO (89, 21.5%), and TOFA (33, 11.5%). The number of patients prescribed TOFA decreased significantly between Group 1 and Group 2 and between Group 2 and Group 3 (p ˂ 0.01). The number of patients who were prescribed BARI decreased significantly between Group 1 and Group 2 and between Group 2 and Group 3 (p ˂ 0.01). In contrast, the number of patients prescribed UPA increased between Group 2 and Group 3 (p ˂ 0.01). Conclusions: These data suggest that the warnings issued for TOFA were followed by a reduction in total JAKi prescriptions. However, the more selective JAKi (UPA and FILGO) were perceived by prescribers as favorable in terms of the risk/benefit ratio, and their use gradually increased at the expense of the other molecules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marino Paroli
- Department of Clinical, Internist, Anesthesiologic and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Becciolini
- Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | | | - Simone Parisi
- Rheumatology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Elena Bravi
- Rheumatology Unit, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy
| | - Romina Andracco
- Rheumatology Unit, ASL1 Liguria, 18038 Bussana di Sanremo, Italy
| | | | | | - Federica Lumetti
- Rheumatology Unit, Azienda USL of Modena and AOU Policlinico of Modena, 41100 Modena, Italy
| | - Antonella Farina
- Internal Medicine Unit, Augusto Murri Hospital, 63900 Fermo, Italy
| | - Patrizia Del Medico
- Internal Medicine Unit, Civitanova Marche Hospital, 62012 Civitanova Marche, Italy
| | - Matteo Colina
- Rheumatology Unit, Internal Medicine Division, Department of Medicine and Oncology, Santa Maria della Scaletta Hospital, 40026 Imola, Italy
- Rheumatology Unit, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Viviana Ravagnani
- Rheumatology Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital APSS-Trento, 38122 Trento, Italy
| | - Palma Scolieri
- Rheumatology Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, 00154 Rome, Italy
| | - Maddalena Larosa
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medical Specialties, Azienda Sanitaria Locale 3 Genovese, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Elisa Visalli
- Rheumatology Unit, Policlinico San Marco Hospital, 95121 Catania, Italy
| | - Olga Addimanda
- Rheumatology Unit, AUSL of Bologna-Policlinico Sant'Orsola-AOU-IRCCS of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Rosetta Vitetta
- Rheumatology Unit, ASL VC Sant'Andrea Hospital, 13100 Vercelli, Italy
| | - Alessandro Volpe
- Rheumatology Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
| | - Alessandra Bezzi
- Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, AUSL della Romagna-Rimini, 47924 Rimini, Italy
| | - Francesco Girelli
- Rheumatology Unit, G.B. Morgagni-L. Pierantoni Hospital, 47121 Forlì, Italy
| | | | - Rosalba Caccavale
- Department of Clinical, Internist, Anesthesiologic and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Eleonora Di Donato
- Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Giuditta Adorni
- Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Daniele Santilli
- Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Gianluca Lucchini
- Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Eugenio Arrigoni
- Rheumatology Unit, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy
| | - Ilaria Platè
- Rheumatology Unit, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy
| | - Natalia Mansueto
- Rheumatology Unit, ASL1 Liguria, 18038 Bussana di Sanremo, Italy
| | | | - Enrico Fusaro
- Rheumatology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Ditto
- Rheumatology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Bruzzese
- Rheumatology Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, 00154 Rome, Italy
| | - Dario Camellino
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medical Specialties, Azienda Sanitaria Locale 3 Genovese, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | - Gerolamo Bianchi
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medical Specialties, Azienda Sanitaria Locale 3 Genovese, 16132 Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Rosario Foti
- Rheumatology Unit, Policlinico San Marco Hospital, 95121 Catania, Italy
| | - Giorgio Amato
- Rheumatology Unit, Policlinico San Marco Hospital, 95121 Catania, Italy
| | | | - Ylenia Dal Bosco
- Rheumatology Unit, Policlinico San Marco Hospital, 95121 Catania, Italy
| | - Roberta Foti
- Rheumatology Unit, Policlinico San Marco Hospital, 95121 Catania, Italy
| | - Massimo Reta
- Rheumatology Unit, AUSL of Bologna-Policlinico Sant'Orsola-AOU-IRCCS of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessia Fiorenza
- Rheumatology Unit, ASL VC Sant'Andrea Hospital, 13100 Vercelli, Italy
| | - Guido Rovera
- Rheumatology Unit, ASL VC Sant'Andrea Hospital, 13100 Vercelli, Italy
| | - Antonio Marchetta
- Rheumatology Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy
| | | | - Fabio Mascella
- Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, AUSL della Romagna-Rimini, 47924 Rimini, Italy
| | - Simone Bernardi
- Rheumatology Unit, G.B. Morgagni-L. Pierantoni Hospital, 47121 Forlì, Italy
| | - Gilda Sandri
- Rheumatology Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy
| | - Dilia Giuggioli
- Rheumatology Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy
| | - Carlo Salvarani
- Rheumatology Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy
| | | | - Veronica Franchina
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Papardo, 98158 Messina, Italy
| | | | - Giulio Ferrero
- Unit of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Santa Corona Hospital, 17027 Pietra Ligure, Italy
| | - Bernd Raffeiner
- Department of Rheumatology, Bolzano Central Hospital, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
| | - Alarico Ariani
- Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Favalli EG, Maioli G, Caporali R. Biologics or Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Who are Insufficient Responders to Conventional Anti-Rheumatic Drugs. Drugs 2024:10.1007/s40265-024-02059-8. [PMID: 38949688 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02059-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disease which can induce progressive disability if not properly treated early. Over the last 20 years, the improvement of knowledge on the pathogenesis of the disease has made available several drugs targeting key elements of the pathogenetic process, which now represent the preferred treatment option after the failure of first-line therapy with conventional drugs such as methotrexate (MTX). To this category of targeted drugs belong anti-cytokine or cell-targeted biological agents and more recently also Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis). In the absence to date of specific biomarkers to guide the therapeutic choice in the context of true precision medicine, the choice of the first targeted drug after MTX failure is guided by treatment cost (especially after the marketing of biosimilar products) and by the clinical characteristics of the patient (age, sex, comorbidities and compliance) and the disease (presence or absence of autoantibodies and systemic or extra-articular manifestations), which may influence the efficacy and safety profile of the available products. This viewpoint focuses on the decision-making process underlying the personalized approach to RA therapy and will analyse the evidence in the literature supporting the choice of individual products and in particular the differential choice between biological drugs and JAKis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ennio Giulio Favalli
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono, 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
- Department of Rheumatology and Medical Sciences, Gaetano Pini-CTO Hospital, P.zza Cardinal Ferrari 1, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriella Maioli
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono, 7, 20122, Milan, Italy.
- Department of Rheumatology and Medical Sciences, Gaetano Pini-CTO Hospital, P.zza Cardinal Ferrari 1, 20122, Milan, Italy.
| | - Roberto Caporali
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono, 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
- Department of Rheumatology and Medical Sciences, Gaetano Pini-CTO Hospital, P.zza Cardinal Ferrari 1, 20122, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Felis-Giemza A, Moskal M, Proc K, Guzera Z, Stajszczyk M, Palej K, Chmurzyńska K, Wiland P, Batko K, Batko B. Multicenter evaluation of tofacitinib retention and safety in rheumatoid arthritis - why cardiovascular risk factors do not equate to overt risk. Reumatologia 2024; 61:414-423. [PMID: 38322101 PMCID: PMC10839916 DOI: 10.5114/reum/175626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction This multicenter, real-world, retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib (TOFA) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Material and methods Two hundred nine patients with active RA treated with TOFA, unresponsive to at least 2 conventional synthetic disease-modifying drugs, were recruited. Clinical characteristics were extracted from an electronic registry and supplemented with manual chart review and data linkage with ambulatory care. Drug retention and reasons for discontinuation were evaluated. Results Median (interquartile range) follow-up in the whole sample was 16.9 (5.93-31.7) months. Mean (standard deviation) age was 51.44 (±11.84) years, with female predominance (n = 168, 80.4%). Only 30 patients (14.4%) had no pre-existing traditional cardiovascular (CV) risk factor at TOFA initiation. Tofacitinib retention rates were high, with median survival estimated at 89.3% at 6 months, 82.4% at 12 months, and 60.4% at 24 months. Ineffectiveness was the primary cause of discontinuation (n = 50). The rate of adverse events (AEs) was relatively low, with lipid abnormalities, blood count alterations, and infectious events among the most common. No major adverse CV event was reported. The incidence rate of AEs necessitating treatment switch was 60.34 (95% CI: 37-92) per 1,000 person-years of follow-up. Presence of multiple (> 3) CV risk factors was associated with lower odds of TOFA retention and treatment effectiveness. Conclusions Tofacitinib demonstrated high retention rates and a favorable safety profile in RA patients, including those with traditional CV risk factors. Tofacitinib may be a valuable treatment option for RA patients when combined with individualized CV risk management. Further studies are warranted to explore the long-term effects of TOFA and its CV impact in larger populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Felis-Giemza
- Biologic Therapy Center, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Mateusz Moskal
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski University, Krakow, Poland
| | - Krzysztof Proc
- Clinical Department of Rheumatology and Internal Medicine, University Clinical Hospital in Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Zbigniew Guzera
- Świętokrzyskie Centrum Reumatologii, St. Luke Hospital, Konskie, Poland
| | - Marcin Stajszczyk
- Department of Rheumatology and Autoimmune Diseases, Silesian Center for Rheumatology, Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Ustron, Poland
| | - Karolina Palej
- Biologic Therapy Center, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Kornelia Chmurzyńska
- Department of Connective Tissue Diseases, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Piotr Wiland
- Department of Rheumatology and Internal Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Krzysztof Batko
- Department of Research and Development, Medicine Economy Law Society (MELS) Foundation, Krakow, Poland
| | - Bogdan Batko
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski University, Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Paroli M, Sirinian MI. When Autoantibodies Are Missing: The Challenge of Seronegative Rheumatoid Arthritis. Antibodies (Basel) 2023; 12:69. [PMID: 37987247 PMCID: PMC10660552 DOI: 10.3390/antib12040069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (SNRA) is characterized by the absence of both rheumatoid factor (RF) and antibodies against the cyclic citrullinated protein (ACPA) in serum. However, the differences between the two forms of RA are more complex and have not yet been definitively characterized. Several lines of evidences support the idea that there are specific elements of the two forms, including genetic background, epidemiology, pathogenesis, severity of progression over time, and response to therapy. Clinical features that may differentiate SNRA from SPRA are also suggested by data obtained from classical radiology and newer imaging techniques. Although new evidence seems to provide additional help in differentiating the two forms of RA, their distinguishing features remain largely elusive. It should also be emphasized that the distinctive features of RA forms, if not properly recognized, can lead to the underdiagnosis of SNRA, potentially missing the period called the "window of opportunity" that is critical for early diagnosis, timely treatment, and better prognosis. This review aims to summarize the data provided in the scientific literature with the goal of helping clinicians diagnose SNRA as accurately as possible, with emphasis on the most recent findings available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marino Paroli
- Center for Allergy and Immunology, Department of Clinical, Internal, Anesthesiologic and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome c/o Polo Pontino, 04100 Latina, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Benucci M, Bardelli M, Cazzato M, Laurino E, Bartoli F, Damiani A, Li Gobbi F, Panaccione A, Di Cato L, Niccoli L, Frediani B, Mosca M, Guiducci S, Cantini F. ReLiFiRa (Real Life Filgotinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis): Retrospective Study of Efficacy and Safety in Common Clinical Practice. J Pers Med 2023; 13:1303. [PMID: 37763071 PMCID: PMC10532886 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13091303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Filgotinib (FIL) is a selective JAK1 inhibitor with an affinity 30-fold higher than JAK2, approved to treat moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), in adults with inadequate response or intolerance to one or more disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). METHODS We conducted a retrospective, multicentric study in order to evaluate efficacy and safety of FIL 200 mg daily therapy, after 3 and 6 months, in 120 patients affected by RA, managed in Tuscany and Umbria rheumatological centers. The following clinical records were analyzed: demographical data, smoking status, previous presence of comorbidities (Herpes zoster -HZ- infection, venous thromboembolism -VTE-, major adverse cardiovascular events -MACE-, cancer, diabetes, and hypertension), disease duration, presence of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA), rheumatoid factor (RF), number of biological failures, and prior csDMARDs utilized. At baseline, and after 3 (T3) and 6 (T6) months of FIL therapy, we evaluated mean steroid dosage, csDMARDs intake, clinimetric indexes (DAS28, CDAI, HAQ, patient and doctor PGA, VAS), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and body mass index (BMI). RESULTS At baseline, the mean disease duration was 9.4 ± 7.5 years; the prevalence of previous HZ infection, VTE, MACE, and cancer was respectively 4.12%, 0%, 7.21%, and 0.83%, respectively. In total, 76.3% of patients failed one or more biologics (one biological failure, 20.6%; two biological failures, 27.8%; three biological failures, 16.5%; four biological failures, 10.3%; five biological failures, 1.1%). After 3 months of FIL therapy, all clinimetric index results significantly improved from baseline, as well as after 6 months. Also, ESR and CRP significatively decreased at T3 and T6. Two cases of HZ were recorded, while no new MACE, VTE, or cancer were recorded during the observation time. CONCLUSION Despite the limitations of the retrospective study and of the observational period of only 6 months, real-life data on the treatment of RA patients with FIL demonstrate that this Jak inhibitor therapy is safe in terms of CV, VTE events, and occurrence of cancer, and is also effective in a population identified as "difficult to treat" due to failure of previous b-DMARD therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurizio Benucci
- Rheumatology Unit, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, 50143 Florence, Italy;
| | - Marco Bardelli
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy; (M.B.); (B.F.)
| | - Massimiliano Cazzato
- Unit of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (M.C.); (E.L.); (M.M.)
| | - Elenia Laurino
- Unit of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (M.C.); (E.L.); (M.M.)
| | - Francesca Bartoli
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy; (F.B.); (A.D.); (S.G.)
| | - Arianna Damiani
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy; (F.B.); (A.D.); (S.G.)
| | | | - Anna Panaccione
- Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, Santa Maria General Hospital, 05100 Terni, Italy; (A.P.); (L.D.C.)
| | - Luca Di Cato
- Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, Santa Maria General Hospital, 05100 Terni, Italy; (A.P.); (L.D.C.)
| | - Laura Niccoli
- Division of Rheumatology, Prato Hospital, 59100 Prato, Italy; (L.N.); (F.C.)
| | - Bruno Frediani
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy; (M.B.); (B.F.)
| | - Marta Mosca
- Unit of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (M.C.); (E.L.); (M.M.)
| | - Serena Guiducci
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy; (F.B.); (A.D.); (S.G.)
| | - Fabrizio Cantini
- Division of Rheumatology, Prato Hospital, 59100 Prato, Italy; (L.N.); (F.C.)
| |
Collapse
|