Evaluation of a New Extracorporeal CO2 Removal Device in an Experimental Setting

Evaluation of CO2 removal rate of ECCO2R for a renal replacement therapy platform in an experimental setting

BACKGROUND

A critical parameter of extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R) applications is the CO2 removal rate (VCO2). Low-flow venovenous extracorporeal support with large-size membrane lung remains undefined. This study aimed to evaluate the VCO2 of a low-flow ECCO2R with large-size membrane lung using a renal replacement therapy platform in an experimental animal model.

METHODS

Twelve healthy pigs were placed under mechanical ventilation and connected to an ECCO2R-CRRT system (surface area = 1.8 m2; OMNIset®, BBraun, Germany). Respiratory settings were reduced to induce two degrees of hypercapnia. VCO2 was recorded under different combinations of PaCO2 (50-69 or 70-89 mm Hg), extracorporeal blood flow (ECBF; 200 or 350 mL/min), and gas flow (4, 6, or 10 L/min).

RESULTS

VCO2 increased with ECBF at all three gas flow rates. In severe hypercapnia, the increase in sweep gas flow from 4 to 10 L/min increased VCO2 from 86.38 ± 7.08 to 96.50 ± 8.71 mL/min at an ECBF of 350 mL/min, whereas at ECBF of 200 mL/min, any increase was less effective. But in mild hypercapnia, the increase in sweep gas flow result in significantly increased VCO2 at two ECBF. VCO2 increased with PaCO2 from 50-69 to 70-89 mm Hg at an ECBF of 350 mL/min, but not at ECBF of 200 mL/min. Post-membrane lung PCO2 levels were similar for different levels of premembrane lung PCO2 (p = 0.08), highlighting the gas exchange diffusion efficacy of the membrane lung in gas exchange diffusion. In severe hypercapnia, the reduction of PaCO2 elevated from 11.5% to 19.6% with ECBF increase only at a high gas flow of 10 L/min (p < 0.05) and increase of gas flow significantly reduced PaCO2 only at a high ECBF of 350 mL/min (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Low-flow venovenous extracorporeal ECCO2R-CRRT with large-size membrane lung is more efficient with the increase of ECBF, sweep gas flow rate, and the degree of hypercapnia. The influence of sweep gas flow on VCO2 depends on the ECBF and degree of hypercapnia. Higher ECBF and gas flow should be chosen to reverse severe hypercapnia.

Safety and Effectiveness of Carbon Dioxide Removal CO2RESET Device in Critically Ill Patients

BACKGROUND

In this retrospective study, we report the effectiveness and safety of a dedicated extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO₂R) device in critically ill patients.

METHODS

Adult patients on mechanical ventilation due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or decompensated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (dCOPD), who were treated with a dedicated ECCO₂R device (CO2RESET, Eurosets, Medolla, Italy) in case of hypercapnic acidemia, were included. Repeated measurements of CO₂ removal (VCO₂) at baseline and 1, 12, and 24 h after the initiation of therapy were recorded.

RESULTS

Over a three-year period, 11 patients received ECCO₂R (median age 60 [43-72] years) 3 (2-39) days after ICU admission; nine patients had ARDS and two had dCOPD. Median baseline pH and PaCO₂ levels were 7.27 (7.12-7.33) and 65 (50-84) mmHg, respectively. With a median ECCO₂R blood flow of 800 (500-800) mL/min and maximum gas flow of 6 (2-14) L/min, the VCO₂ at 12 h after ECCO₂R initiation was 157 (58-183) mL/min. Tidal volume, respiratory rate, and driving pressure were significantly reduced over time. Few side effects were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, a dedicated ECCO₂R device provided a high VCO₂ with a favorable risk profile.

Alkaline Liquid Ventilation of the Membrane Lung for Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal (ECCO2R): In Vitro Study

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO₂R) is a promising strategy to manage acute respiratory failure. We hypothesized that ECCO₂R could be enhanced by ventilating the membrane lung with a sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution with high CO₂ absorbing capacity. A computed mathematical model was implemented to assess NaOH–CO₂ interactions. Subsequently, we compared NaOH infusion, named “alkaline liquid ventilation”, to conventional oxygen sweeping flows. We built an extracorporeal circuit with two polypropylene membrane lungs, one to remove CO₂ and the other to maintain a constant PCO₂ (60 ± 2 mmHg). The circuit was primed with swine blood. Blood flow was 500 mL × min⁻¹. After testing the safety and feasibility of increasing concentrations of aqueous NaOH (up to 100 mmol × L⁻¹), the CO₂ removal capacity of sweeping oxygen was compared to that of 100 mmol × L⁻¹ NaOH. We performed six experiments to randomly test four sweep flows (100, 250, 500, 1000 mL × min⁻¹) for each fluid plus 10 L × min⁻¹ oxygen. Alkaline liquid ventilation proved to be feasible and safe. No damages or hemolysis were detected. NaOH showed higher CO₂ removal capacity compared to oxygen for flows up to 1 L × min⁻¹. However, the highest CO₂ extraction power exerted by NaOH was comparable to that of 10 L × min⁻¹ oxygen. Further studies with dedicated devices are required to exploit potential clinical applications of alkaline liquid ventilation.