Theater in the Self-Cleaning Cell: Intrinsically Disordered Proteins or Protein Regions Acting with Membranes in Autophagy

When an underdog becomes a major player: the role of protein structural disorder in the Atg8 conjugation system

The noncanonical ubiquitin-like conjugation cascade involving the E1 (Atg7), E2 (Atg3, Atg10), and E3 (Atg12-Atg5-Atg16 complex) enzymes is essential for incorporation of Atg8 into the growing phagophore via covalent linkage to PE. This process is an indispensable step in autophagy. Atg8 and E1-E3 enzymes are the first subset from the core autophagy protein machinery structures that were investigated in earlier studies by crystallographic analyses of globular domains. However, research over the past decade shows that many important functions in the conjugation machinery are mediated by intrinsically disordered protein regions (IDPRs) - parts of the protein that do not adopt a stable secondary or tertiary structure, which are inherently dynamic and well suited for protein-membrane interactions but are invisible in protein crystals. Here, we summarize earlier and recent findings on the autophagy conjugation machinery by focusing on the IDPRs. This summary reveals that IDPRs, originally considered dispensable, are in fact major players and a driving force in the function of the autophagy conjugation system. Abbreviation: AD, activation domain of Atg7; AH, amphipathic helix; AIM, Atg8-family interacting motif; CL, catalytic loop (of Atg7); CTD, C-terminal domain; FR, flexible region (of Atg3 or Atg10); GUV, giant unilammelar vesicles; HR, handle region (of Atg3); IDPR, intrinsically disordered protein region; IDPs: intrinsically disordered proteins; LIR, LC3-interacting region; NHD: N-terminal helical domain; NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; UBL, ubiquitin like.

Protein structure-function continuum model: Emerging nexuses between specificity, evolution, and structure

The rationale for replacing the old binary of structure-function with the trinity of structure, disorder, and function has gained considerable ground in recent years. A continuum model based on the expanded form of the existing paradigm can now subsume importance of both conformational flexibility and intrinsic disorder in protein function. The disorder is actually critical for understanding the protein-protein interactions in many regulatory processes, formation of membrane-less organelles, and our revised notions of specificity as amply illustrated by moonlighting proteins. While its importance in formation of amyloids and function of prions is often discussed, the roles of intrinsic disorder in infectious diseases and protein function under extreme conditions are also becoming clear. This review is an attempt to discuss how our current understanding of protein function, specificity, and evolution fit better with the continuum model. This integration of structure and disorder under a single model may bring greater clarity in our continuing quest for understanding proteins and molecular mechanisms of their functionality.

The Epigenetic Dimension of Protein Structure Is an Intrinsic Weakness of the AlphaFold Program

One of the most important lessons we have learned from sequencing the human genome is that not all proteins have a 3D structure. In fact, a large part of the human proteome is made up of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) which can adopt multiple structures, and therefore, multiple functions, depending on the ligands with which they interact. Under these conditions, one can wonder about the value of algorithms developed for predicting the structure of proteins, in particular AlphaFold, an AI which claims to have solved the problem of protein structure. In a recent study, we highlighted a particular weakness of AlphaFold for membrane proteins. Based on this observation, we have proposed a paradigm, referred to as “Epigenetic Dimension of Protein Structure” (EDPS), which takes into account all environmental parameters that control the structure of a protein beyond the amino acid sequence (hence “epigenetic”). In this new study, we compare the reliability of the AlphaFold and Robetta algorithms’ predictions for a new set of membrane proteins involved in human pathologies. We found that Robetta was generally more accurate than AlphaFold for ascribing a membrane-compatible topology. Raft lipids (e.g., gangliosides), which control the structural dynamics of membrane protein structure through chaperone effects, were identified as major actors of the EDPS paradigm. We conclude that the epigenetic dimension of a protein structure is an intrinsic weakness of AI-based protein structure prediction, especially AlphaFold, which warrants further development.