Computational and Histological Analyses for Investigating Mechanical Interaction of Thermally Drawn Fiber Implants with Brain Tissue

Smart/stimuli-responsive chitosan/gelatin and other polymeric macromolecules natural hydrogels vs. synthetic hydrogels systems for brain tissue engineering: A state-of-the-art review

Currently, there are no viable curative treatments that can enhance the central nervous system's (CNS) recovery from trauma or illness. Bioengineered injectable smart/stimuli-responsive hydrogels (SSRHs) that mirror the intricacy of the CNS milieu and architecture have been suggested as a way to get around these restrictions in combination with medication and cell therapy. Additionally, the right biophysical and pharmacological stimuli are required to boost meaningful CNS regeneration. Recent research has focused heavily on developing SSRHs as cutting-edge delivery systems that can direct the regeneration of brain tissue. In the present article, we have discussed the pathology of brain injuries, and the applicable strategies employed to regenerate the brain tissues. Moreover, the most promising SSRHs for neural tissue engineering (TE) including alginate (Alg.), hyaluronic acid (HA), chitosan (CH), gelatin, and collagen are used in natural polymer-based hydrogels and thoroughly discussed in this review. The ability of these hydrogels to distribute bioactive substances or cells in response to internal and external stimuli is highlighted with particular attention. In addition, this article provides a summary of the most cutting-edge techniques for CNS recovery employing SSRHs for several neurodegenerative diseases.

Neural tissue-microelectrode interaction: Brain micromotion, electrical impedance, and flexible microelectrode insertion

Insertion of a microelectrode into the brain to record/stimulate neurons damages neural tissue and blood vessels and initiates the brain's wound healing response. Due to the large difference between the stiffness of neural tissue and microelectrode, brain micromotion also leads to neural tissue damage and associated local immune response. Over time, following implantation, the brain's response to the tissue damage can result in microelectrode failure. Reducing the microelectrode's cross-sectional dimensions to single-digit microns or using soft materials with elastic modulus close to that of the neural tissue are effective methods to alleviate the neural tissue damage and enhance microelectrode longevity. However, the increase in electrical impedance of the microelectrode caused by reducing the microelectrode contact site's dimensions can decrease the signal-to-noise ratio. Most importantly, the reduced dimensions also lead to a reduction in the critical buckling force, which increases the microelectrode's propensity to buckling during insertion. After discussing brain micromotion, the main source of neural tissue damage, surface modification of the microelectrode contact site is reviewed as a key method for addressing the increase in electrical impedance issue. The review then focuses on recent approaches to aiding insertion of flexible microelectrodes into the brain, including bending stiffness modification, effective length reduction, and application of a magnetic field to pull the electrode. An understanding of the advantages and drawbacks of the developed strategies offers a guide for dealing with the buckling phenomenon during implantation.