The Status of Biofilms in Penile Implants

Emerging strategies for the prevention of bacterial biofilm in prosthetic surgery

Penile prosthesis implantation is an effective treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED) with high patient satisfaction and effectiveness. Unfortunately, infections remain a dreaded complication, often necessitating device removal and imposing a substantial healthcare cost. Biofilms are communities of microorganisms encased in a self-produced polymeric matrix that can attach to penile prostheses. Biofilms have been demonstrated on the majority of explanted prostheses for both infectious and non-infectious revisions and are prevalent even in asymptomatic patients. Biofilms play a role in microbial persistence and exhibit unique antibiotic resistance strategies that can lead to increased infection rates in revision surgery. Biofilms demonstrate physical barriers through the development of an extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) that hinders antibiotic penetrance and the bacteria within biofilms demonstrate reduced metabolic activity that weakens the efficacy of traditional antibiotics. Despite these challenges, new methods are being developed and investigated to prevent and treat biofilms. These treatments include surface modifications, biosurfactants, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), and nitric oxide (NO) to prevent bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. Additionally, novel antibiotic treatments are currently under investigation and include antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), bacteriophages, and refillable antibiotic coatings. This article reviews biofilm formation, the challenges that biofilms present to conventional antibiotics, current treatments, and experimental approaches for biofilm prevention and treatment.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in urologic interventions: Who, when, where?

BACKGROUND

Periprocedural prophylaxis in medicine encompasses the set of measures (physical, chemical, and pharmacological) used to reduce the risk of infection. Antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) refers to the administration of a short-term regimen of antibiotics shortly before a medical procedure to reduce the risk of infectious complications that can result from diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. The outspreading growth of multidrug-resistant bacterial species and changes in the bacterial local ecosystem have impeded the development of a unique scheme of AP in urology.

OBJECTIVES

To review the literature and current guidelines regarding AP for urological diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, and to define agents, timing, and occasions when administering pharmacological prophylaxis. Secondly, according to current literature, to open new scenarios where AP can be useful or useless.

RESULTS

Major gaps in evidence still exist in this field. AP appears useful in many invasive procedures and some sub-populations at risk of infectious complications. AP is not routinely recommended for urodynamic exams, diagnostic cystoscopy, and extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy. The available data regarding the use of AP during the transperineal prostate biopsy are still unclear; conversely, in the case of the transrectal approach AP is mandatory. AP is still considered the gold standard for the prevention of postoperative infective complications in the case of ureteroscopy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, endoscopic resection of bladder tumor, endoscopic resection of the prostate, and prosthetic or major surgery.

CONCLUSION

The review highlights the complexity of determining the appropriate candidates for AP, emphasizing the importance of considering patient-specific factors such as comorbidities, immunocompetence, and the nature of the urologic intervention. The evidence suggests that a one-size-fits-all approach may not be suitable, and a tailored strategy based on the specific procedure and patient characteristics is essential.

Penile prostheses harbor biofilms driven by individual variability and manufacturer even in the absence of clinical infection

BACKGROUND

Culture-based studies have shown that penile prostheses harbor biofilms in the presence and absence of infection, but these findings have not been adequately validated using contemporary microbiome analytic techniques.

AIM

The study sought to characterize microbial biofilms of indwelling penile prosthesis devices according to patient factors, device components, manufacturer, and infection status.

METHODS

Upon penile prostheses surgical explantation, device biofilms were extracted, sonicated, and characterized using shotgun metagenomics and culture-based approaches. Device components were also analyzed using scanning electron microscopy.

OUTCOMES

Outcomes included the presence or absence of biofilms, alpha and beta diversity, specific microbes identified and the presence of biofilm, and antibiotic resistance genes on each prosthesis component.

RESULTS

The average age of participants from whom devices were explanted was 61 ± 11 years, and 9 (45%) of 20 had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Seventeen devices were noninfected, and 3 were associated with clinical infection. Mean device indwelling time prior to explant was 5.1 ± 5.1 years. All analyzed components from 20 devices had detectable microbial biofilms, both in the presence and absence of infection. Scanning electron microscopy corroborated the presence of biofilms across device components. Significant differences between viruses, prokaryotes, and metabolic pathways were identified between individual patients, device manufacturers, and infection status. Mobiluncus curtisii was enriched in manufacturer A device biofilms relative to manufacturer B device biofilms. Bordetella bronchialis, Methylomicrobium alcaliphilum, Pseudoxanthomonas suwonensis, and Porphyrobacter sp. were enriched in manufacturer B devices relative to manufacturer A devices. The most abundant bacterial phyla were the Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Firmicutes. Glycogenesis, the process of glycogen synthesis, was among the predominant metabolic pathways detected across device components. Beta diversity of bacteria, viruses, protozoa, and pathways did not differ among device components.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

All components of all penile prostheses removed from infected and noninfected patients have biofilms. The significance of biofilms on noninfected devices remains unknown and merits further investigation.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

Strengths include the multipronged approach to characterize biofilms and being the first study to include all components of penile prostheses in tandem. Limitations include the relatively few number of infected devices in the series, a relatively small subset of devices included in shotgun metagenomics analysis, and the lack of anaerobic and other expanded conditions for culture.

CONCLUSION

Penile prosthesis biofilms are apparent in the presence and absence of infection, and the composition of biofilms was driven primarily by device manufacturer, individual variability, and infection, while being less impacted by device component.

Evaluation of Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activity of Biogenic Silver Nanoparticles and Gentamicin Against Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Caprine Mastitis

The goal of this study was to assess the antibacterial efficiency of biogenic silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and gentamicin against Staphylococcus aureus that can form biofilms. The characterization of AgNPs‎ was confirmed by the scanning electron microscope (SEM) which was spherical and homogenous in form, with a diameter between 25 and 45 nm. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) presented the size of AgNPs to be 50 nm. Energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) was used to examine the presence of elemental silver. The three-dimensional structure of silver nanoparticles was discovered using an atomic force microscope (AFM), with a diameter of 47.18 nm on average. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC) of AgNPs and gentamicin against S. aureus isolated from caprine mastitis were determined using the microdilution assay. The checkerboard microdilution technique was utilized to inspect the synergistic antibacterial activity of AgNPs with gentamicin utilizing the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI). The antibiofilm capability of AgNPs was also investigated. The results indicate that AgNPs generated by biosynthesis are antibacterial against S. aureus. Moreover, AgNPs and gentamicin exhibit synergistic action. The study's findings suggest that biogenic AgNPs may act as anti-biofilm agents and treat mastitis caused by S. aureus. In conclusions biosynthesized AgNPs exhibit strong antibacterial and antibiofilm effectiveness and synergistic activity when combined with gentamicin.