Does Intra-Wound Vancomycin Powder Affect the Action of Intra-Articular Tranexamic Acid in Total Joint Replacement?

Local vancomycin administration in Orthopaedic Surgery - A systematic review of comparative studies

Background

There is still controversy surrounding the routine use of vancomycin locally in primary orthopaedic surgery procedures. Therefore, the aim of this review is to assess how local vancomycin impacts the rates and microbiology of surgical site infections.

Methods

A systematic electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science was carried out for all comparative studies comparing locally applied vancomycin to control for primary orthopaedic surgery procedures published before August 14, 2022.

Results

A total of 61 studies with 65,671 patients were included for analysis. Forty-six studies used vancomycin powder, 12 studies with grafts soaked in vancomycin, two studies used vancomycin irrigation, and one study administered vancomycin interosseously. There were 15 studies (of 26) in spine surgery, five (of 14) in arthroplasty, ten (of 11) in sports medicine, and two (of five) in trauma surgery that found statistically significant decreases in overall infection rates when applying local vancomycin. Only one study (in spine surgery) found significant increases in infection rates with local vancomycin application. For spine surgery, local vancomycin application had the greatest proportion of gram-negative bacteria (40.7%) isolated compared to S. aureus (42.4%) in controls. In arthroplasty and trauma surgery, there were increases in the proportions of gram-negative bacteria when vancomycin was added. There were no reported systemic adverse reactions associated with local vancomycin use in any of the studies.

Conclusion

Applying local vancomycin during primary orthopaedic surgery procedures may reduce the rates of infections in multiple different orthopaedic specialties, particularly in spine surgery and sports medicine. However, careful consideration should be applied when administering local vancomycin during specific orthopaedic procedures given the heterogeneity of included studies and breadth of surgeries included in this review.

Level of evidence

Level III. A systematic review of level I - III studies.

Efficacy of Intrawound Vancomycin in Prevention of Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Double-Blinded Randomized Control Trial

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a devastating complication. Intrawound vancomycin powder has been shown to reduce infection rates in spine surgery, but its role in arthroplasty remains controversial. This prospective randomized control trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intrawound vancomycin in preventing PJI after primary TKA.

METHODS

A total of 1,022 patients were randomized to the study group (n = 507, who received 2 grams intrawound vancomycin powder before arthrotomy closure) or to the control group (n = 515, no local vancomycin) with a minimum follow-up of 12-months. The primary outcome was the incidence of PJI or surgical site infection (SSI). Secondary outcomes included associated minor complications such as stitch abscess, persistent wound drainage, and delayed stitch removal. Other parameters evaluated include reoperation rates and incidences of nephrotoxicity.

RESULTS

The overall infection rate in 1,022 patients was 0.66%. There was no significant difference in PJI rate in the study group (N = 1; 0.2%) versus the control group (N = 3; 0.58%), P = .264. Reoperation rates in the study group (N = 4; 0.78%) and control (N = 5; 0.97%), and SSI rates in the study (N = 1; 0.2%) and control groups (N = 2; 0.38%) were comparable. The Vancomycin cohort, however, demonstrated a significantly higher number of minor wound complications (n = 67; 13.2%) compared to the control group (n = 39; 7.56%, P < .05). Subgroup analysis showed diabetics in the study group to also have a higher incidence of minor wound complications (24 [14.1%] versus 10 [6.2%]; P < 05]. Multivariate analyses found that vancomycin use (odds ratio = 1.64) and smoking (odds ratio = 1.85) were associated with an increased risk of developing minor wound complications. No cases of nephrotoxicity were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Intrawound vancomycin powder does not appear to reduce PJI/SSI rate in primary total knee arthroplasties, including high-risk groups. Although safe from a renal perspective, intrawound vancomycin was associated with an increase in postoperative aseptic wound complications. Intrawound vancomycin may not be effective in reducing the rate of PJI in primary TKA.

Prophylactic use of vancomycin powder on postoperative infection after total joint arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

By reviewing the literature analyzing vancomycin powder for preventive surgery, the effect of this method on reducing the infection rate after TJA was systematically evaluated to provide a basis for future clinical work.

METHODS

Using PubMed, Medline, Elsevier, and CNKI, with the following mesh words: "vancomycin", "local / intraoperative / topical / intrawound", "TJA", "TKA", "THA", "total joint arthroplasty", "total knee arthroplasty", "total hip arthroplasty", "infection", and "SSI", to search for case-control research papers on the impact of prophylactic application of vancomycin powder on the incidence of postoperative infection, we compared the overall infection rate in the literature by using RevMan 5.3 meta-analysis software and analyzed the impact of vancomycin on the infection rate of different parts and types of TJA according to different subgroups.

RESULTS

A total of 22 qualified studies were selected; twenty-five studies compared the effect of prophylactic use of vancomycin powder on infection rates after TJA. There were 23,363 cases in total, including 9545 cases in the vancomycin group and 13,818 cases in the control group. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the possibility of postoperative infection after prophylactic use of vancomycin powder was significantly lower than that without vancomycin risk ratio: 0.38 [0.23,0.59], P < 0.01). However, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed no significant effect of vancomycin on postoperative infection (P = 0.52).

CONCLUSION

Based on the retrospective studies, local prophylactic use of vancomycin powder in TJA can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative infection. High-quality RCTs should be carried out to further evaluate these results.

Effects of different doses of vancomycin powder in total knee and hip arthroplasty on the periprosthetic joint infection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is a serious complication for patients. Some joint surgeons have tried to use vancomycin powder (VP) in total knee and total hip arthroplasty to prevent postoperative PJI, but its effect is still not clear. At present, there is no meta-analysis that specifically analyses the effect of different doses of vancomycin powder on the incidence of PJI.

METHODS

We carried out a search based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and identified the studies we needed. Review Manager (RevMan) 5.3 software was employed for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The analysis of primary TKA (PTKA) showed that using 1 g (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.22-0.67 [P = 0.0008]) and 2 g (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.31-0.74 [P = 0.0008]) of vancomycin powder in primary TKA (PTKA) could all significantly prevent PJI. The analysis of primary THA (PTHA) showed that using 1 g (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.17-0.80 [P = 0.01]) of vancomycin powder effectively decreased the incidence of PJI, while using 2 g (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.53-1.97 [P = 0.94]) of vancomycin powder had no significant effect on preventing PJI. Because the data were abnormal, we believed the conclusion that using 2 g of vancomycin powder in primary THA had no effect on preventing PJI was doubtful. Using vancomycin powder in revision TKA (RTKA) significantly reduced the PJI rate (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.77 [P = 0.01]), similar to revision THA (RTHA) (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.14-0.96 [P = 0.04]).

CONCLUSIONS

In primary TKA, both 1 g and 2 g of vancomycin powder can effectively prevent PJI. In primary THA, using 1 g of vancomycin powder is a better choice, while the effect of using 2 g of vancomycin powder is not clear, and a more prospective randomized controlled trial should be done to verify it. In revision TKA and revision THA, vancomycin powder is a good choice to prevent PJI.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intrawound Vancomycin in Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Continued Call for a Prospective Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint injection (PJI) is a rare, but life-altering complication of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Though intrawound vancomycin powder (IVP) has been studied in other orthopedic subspecialties, its efficacy and safety in TJA has not been established.

METHODS

PubMed and MEDLINE databases were used to identify studies utilizing IVP in primary and revision total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA). Postoperative PJI data were pooled using random effect models with results reported as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Studies were weighted by the inverse variance of their effect estimates.

RESULTS

Overall, 16 of the 1871 studies identified were pooled for final analysis, yielding 33,731 patients totally. Of these, 17 164 received IVP. In aggregate, patients who received IVP had a decreased rate of PJI (OR 0.46, P < .05). Separately, TKA and THA patients who received IVP had lower rates of PJI (OR 0.41, P < .05 and OR 0.45, P < .05, respectively). Aggregate analysis of primary TKA and THA patients also revealed a decreased PJI rate (OR 0.44, P < .05). Pooled revision TKA and THA patients had a similar decrease in PJI rates (OR 0.30, P < .05). Although no publication bias was appreciated, these findings are limited by the low-quality evidence available.

CONCLUSION

While IVP may reduce the risk of PJI in primary and revision TJA, its widespread use cannot be recommended until higher-quality data, such as that obtained from randomized control trials, are available. This study underscores the continued need for more rigorous studies before general adoption of this practice by arthroplasty surgeons.

Can Topical Vancomycin Prevent Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after hip and knee arthroplasty is a leading cause of revision surgery, inferior function, complications, and death. The administration of topical, intrawound vancomycin (vancomycin powder) has appeared promising in some studies, but others have found it ineffective in reducing infection risk; for that reason, a high-quality systematic review of the best-available evidence is needed.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In this systematic review, we asked: (1) Does topical vancomycin (vancomycin powder) reduce PJI risk in hip and knee arthroplasty? (2) Does topical vancomycin lead to an increased risk of complications after hip and knee arthroplasty?

METHODS

A search of Embase, MEDLINE, and PubMed databases as of June 2020 was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies comparing topical vancomycin in addition to standard infection prevention regimens (such as routine perioperative intravenous antibiotics) with standard regimens only in primary hip and knee arthroplasty were identified. Patients 18 years or older with a minimum follow-up of 3 months were included. No restrictions on maximal loss to follow-up or PJI definition were imposed. Studies were excluded if they included patients with a history of septic arthritis, used an antibiotic other than vancomycin or a different route of administration for the intervention, performed additional interventions that differed between groups, or omitted a control group. A total of 2408 studies were screened, resulting in nine eligible studies reviewing 3371 patients who received topical vancomycin (vancomycin powder) during a primary THA or TKA and 2884 patients who did not receive it. Groups were comparable with respect to duration of follow-up and loss to follow-up when reported. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, showing moderate-to-high quality for the included studies. The risks of PJI and overall complications in the topical vancomycin group were compared with those in the control group.

RESULTS

One of nine studies found a lower risk of PJI after primary THA or TKA, while eight did not, with odds ratios that broadly bracketed the line of no difference (range of odds ratios across the nine studies 0.09 to 1.97). In the six studies where overall complications could be compared between topical vancomycin and control groups in primary THA or TKA, there was no difference in overall complication risks with vancomycin (range of ORs across the six studies 0.48 to 0.94); however, we caution that these studies were underpowered to detect differences in the types of uncommon complications associated with vancomycin use (such as allergy, ototoxicity, and nephrotoxicity).

CONCLUSION

In the absence of clear evidence of efficacy, and without a sufficiently large evidence base reporting on safety-related endpoints, topical vancomycin (vancomycin powder) should not be used in routine primary THA and TKA. Adequately powered, multicenter, prospective trials demonstrating clear reductions in infection risk and large registry-driven audits of safety-related endpoints are required before the widespread use of topical vancomycin can be recommended.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

The application of topical vancomycin powder for the prevention of surgical site infections in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections (SSIs), particularly periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), following a primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) impose a major burden by increasing morbidity, mortality, disability rate, and health expenditure. Surgeons are increasingly using topical vancomycin powder as a preventative measure, but the effectiveness of this method has been debated in TJA. Thus, we designed a meta-analysis to compare the outcomes after primary TJA between a group treated with topical vancomycin powder and an untreated control group aiming to answer: (1) whether the application of topical vancomycin powder can reduce the infection rate after primary total joint replacement; (2) are the main types of pathogens causing SSIs after the application of topical vancomycin powder different from those of patients not using topical vancomycin?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. We included retrospective cohort studies and prospective randomized controlled trials of patients who underwent primary total joint arthroplasty with and without vancomycin powder application before wound closure and reported the SSI rates. The English literature in the PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases was comprehensively searched. Literature search, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by 2 authors. The main outcomes were SSI and PJI rates, and the secondary outcome was the bacterial spectrum. Statistical analyses were performed with the Review Manager (RevMan) Version 5.3.

RESULTS

Six retrospective cohort studies and 3 prospective cohort studies with 4512 participants were included (2354 in vancomycin group and 2158 in the control group). In the TJA group, the vancomycin powder-treatment resulted in a significantly lower proportion of patients with SSIs (relative risk [RR]=0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.27-0.61 [p<0.001]) or PJI (RR=0.37, 95% CI=0.23-0.60 (p<0.001)). In the total hip arthroplasty group, the vancomycin powder treatment decreased the rate of SSIs and PJI by 66% (RR=0.34, 95% CI=0.15-0.78 [p=0.01]) and 74% (RR=0.26, 95% CI=0.10-0.67 (p=0.005)), respectively. In the total knee arthroplasty group, the vancomycin powder decreased the rate of SSIs and PJI by 67% (RR=0.43, 95% CI=0.26-0.70 [p<0.001]) and 66% (RR=0.44, 95% CI=0.25-0.77 [p=0.004]) respectively. Staphylococcus aureus (or methicillin-sensitiveStaphylococcus aureus) (6 in vancomycin group versus 11 in control group) was the most common pathogenic bacteria, followed by Staphylococcus epidermidis (1 in vancomycin group versus 2 in control group) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (2 in vancomycin group versus 4 in control group). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the main gram-negative pathogen, with 3 cases in the control group and 1 case in the vancomycin powder-treatment group.

DISCUSSION

The local application of vancomycin powder could significantly decrease the rate of SSIs and PJI in primary TJA without modifying the spectrum of bacteria involved. We recommend topical administration of the vancomycin powder before wound closure after a full evaluation of the patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; meta-analysis.

The bactericidal effect of vancomycin is not altered by tranexamic acid, adrenalin, dexamethasone, or lidocaine in vitro

One of the most challenging complications of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). There is growing evidence of a good anti-infective effect of intrawound vancomycin powder in total joint arthroplasty. At the same time, various different locally applied substances have become popular in total joint arthroplasty. The objective of this study was therefore to investigate a possible inhibition of the bactericidal effect of vancomycin by tranexamic acid, adrenalin, lidocaine, or dexamethasone. The bactericidal effect of vancomycin was quantified using the established method of the agar diffusion test. The plates were incubated with Staphylococcus aureus or Staphylococcus epidermidis and four wells were stamped out. The wells were filled with vancomycin alone, the tested substance alone or a mixture of the two. The fourth well remained empty as a control. The plates were incubated overnight at 37 °C and the zone of inhibition in each field was measured on the next day. All tests were run three times for each pathogen and mean values and standard deviations of the measurements were calculated. Differences between the substances were tested using the t-test at a level of significance of 0.05. The bacterial growth was homogeneous on all plates. The baseline value for the zone of inhibition of vancomycin was on average 6.2 ± 0.4 mm for Staphylococcus aureus and 12 ± 0.3 mm for Staphylococcus epidermidis. In all other substances, no inhibition was detected around the well. The combination of vancomycin and each other substance did not show any different result compared to vancomycin alone. The bactericidal effect of vancomycin on staphylococci is not altered by tranexamic acid, adrenalin, dexamethasone, or lidocaine in vitro.