Risk Factors and Outcome of Multidrug-Resistant Infections after Heart Transplant: A Contemporary Single Center Experience

Multidrug-resistant organism bloodstream infections in solid organ transplant recipients and impact on mortality: a systematic review

Background

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) cause significant morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. There are few data regarding the contribution of MDR organisms (MDROs) to these infections. We evaluated the resistance percentage of MDRO BSIs in SOT recipients and the associated mortality.

Methods

A systematic review of MEDLINE and Embase databases up to January 2024, for studies of adult SOT recipients that quantified MDRO BSI resistance percentage and/or associated crude mortality. MDROs studied were carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA), third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GCR-E), MRSA and VRE. Resistance percentage and mortality outcomes were reported as median (IQR) and crude mortality (%), respectively.

Results

Of 945 studies identified, 52 were included. Most were retrospective (41/52) and/or single centre (37/52), and liver transplantation was the most frequently studied SOT type (22/52). High resistance percentages of BSIs were noted, ranging from 13.6% CRE for Enterobacterales to 59.2% CRAB for A. baumannii. Resistance percentage trends decreased over time, but these changes were not statistically significant. Asia had the highest resistance percentages for MRSA [86.2% (IQR 77.3%-94.6%)], 3GCR-E [59.5% (IQR 40.5%-66.7%)] and CRE [35.7% (IQR 8.3%-63.1%)]. North America had the highest VRE resistance percentages [77.7% (IQR 54.6%-94.7%)]. Crude mortality was 15.4%-82.4% and was consistently higher than for non-MDRO BSIs.

Conclusions

MDRO BSI resistance percentages were high for all pathogens studied (IQR 24.6%-69.4%) but there was geographical and temporal heterogeneity. MDRO BSIs were associated with high mortality in SOT recipients. Microbiological and clinical data in this vulnerable population were incomplete, highlighting the need for robust international multicentre studies.

Evidence-Based Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections: A Critical Reappraisal

Multidrug-resistant (MDR)/extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa is emerging as a major threat related to adverse patient outcomes. The goal of this review is to describe evidence-based empiric and targeted treatment regimens that can be exploited when dealing with suspected or confirmed infections due to MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa. P. aeruginosa has inherent resistance to many drug classes, the capacity to form biofilms, and most importantly, the ability to quickly acquire resistance to ongoing treatments. Based on the presence of risk factors for MDR/XDR infections and local epidemiology, where large proportions of strains are resistant to classic beta-lactams, the recommended empirical treatment for suspected P. aeruginosa infections is based on ceftolozane-tazobactam or ceftazidime-avibactam. Where local epidemiology indicates low rates of MDR/XDR and there are no risk factors, a third or fourth generation cephalosporin can be used in the context of a "carbapenem-sparing" strategy. Whenever feasible, antibiotic de-escalation is recommended after antimicrobial susceptibility tests suggest that it is appropriate, and de-escalation is based on different resistance mechanisms. Cefiderocol and imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam withstand most resistance mechanisms and may remain active in cases with resistance to other new antibiotics. Confronting the growing threat of MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa, treatment choices should be wise, sparing newer antibiotics when dealing with a suspected/confirmed susceptible P. aeruginosa strain and choosing the right option for MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa based on specific types and resistance mechanisms.

Role of bacteriophage therapy for resistant infections in transplant recipients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) are prevalent in transplant recipients and associated with poor outcomes. We review recent cases of phage therapy used to treat recalcitrant infections in transplant recipients and explore the future role of such therapy in this setting.

RECENT FINDINGS

Individual case reports and small case series suggest possible efficacy of phage therapy for the treatment of MDRO infections in pre and posttransplant patients. Importantly, there have been no serious safety concerns in the reported cases that we reviewed. There are no applicable randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to better guide phage therapy at this time.

SUMMARY

Given the safety and possibility of successful salvage therapy of MDRO infections using bacteriophages, it is reasonable to pursue phage therapy for difficult-to-treat infections on a compassionate use basis, but RCT data are critically needed to better inform management.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcome of MDR/XDR Bacterial Infections in a Neuromuscular Semi-Intensive/Sub-Intensive Care Unit

(1) Background: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and microbiological characteristics of multidrug-resistant infections in a neuromuscular semi-intensive/sub-intensive care unit; (2) Methods: Retrospective analysis on data from 18 patients with NMD with proven MDRO/XDRO colonisation/infection from August 2021 to March 2022 was carried out; (3) Results: Ten patients were males (55.6%), with a median age of 54 years, and there were fourteen patients (77.8%) with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. All patients had at least one invasive device. Ten (55.6%) patients developed MDRO/XDRO infection (with a median time of 24 days) while six (33.3%) were colonised. The Charlson comorbidity index was >2 in both groups but higher in the infected compared with the colonised (4.5 vs. 3). Infected patients were mostly females (seven patients) with a median age of 62 years. The most common pathogens were Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, infecting four (28.6%) patients each. Of eighteen infectious episodes, nine were pneumonia (hospital-acquired in seven cases). Colistin was the most commonly active antibiotic while carbapenems were largely inactive. Eradication of infection occurred in seven infectious episodes (38.9%). None of those with infection died; (4) Conclusions: MDRO/XDRO infections are common in patients with neuromuscular diseases, with carbapenem-resistant non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli prevailing. These infections were numerically associated with the female sex, greater age, and comorbidities. Both eradication and infection-related mortality appeared low. We highlight the importance of infection prevention in this vulnerable population.

Nosocomial Extracardiac Infections After Cardiac Surgery

Purpose of Review

Nosocomial extracardiac infections after cardiac surgery are a major public health issue affecting 3–8.2% of patients within 30–60 days following the intervention.

Recent Findings

Here, we have considered the most important postoperative infective complications that, in order of frequency, are pneumonia, surgical site infection, urinary tract infection, and bloodstream infection. The overall picture that emerges shows that they cause a greater perioperative morbidity and mortality with a longer hospitalization time and excess costs. Preventive interventions and corrective measures, diminishing the burden of nosocomial extracardiac infections, may reduce the global costs. A multidisciplinary team may assure a more appropriate management of nosocomial extracardiac infections leading to a reduction of hospitalization time and mortality rate.

Summary

The main and most current data on epidemiology, prevention, microbiology, diagnosis, and management for each one of the most important postoperative infective complications are reported. The establishment of an antimicrobial stewardship in each hospital seems to be, at the moment, the more valid strategy to counteract the challenging problems.

The role of Gram-negative bacteria in skin and soft tissue infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are a leading cause of morbidity, emergency department visits and hospitalization. In recent years, the spread of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (GNB) is also increasing in SSTIs. However, the armamentarium of available drugs is recently expanding as well. In this review, we reported the most recent data and about management and treatment of SSTIs caused by GNB, mainly for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), Pseudomonas spp and Acinetobacter spp.

RECENT FINDINGS

The increasing incidence of carbapenem-resistant GNB is challenging for management and treatment, considering the high rate of inappropriate empiric and targeted antimicrobial treatments. The role of new antibiotics, mainly licensed for the treatment of other infections, is an object of continuous debate. As a matter of fact, no specific clinical trials on SSTIs have been performed for new drugs; however, recent data about the use in real life of new compounds in clinical practice are available.

SUMMARY

Some recently approved drugs are actually considered the backbone of targeted therapy in patients with severe infections caused by susceptible carbapenem-resistant GNB strains. Prompt diagnosis of cSSTIs is crucial and, when necessary, surgical debridement for source control of infection is the milestone of the treatment. The physicians should be confident to identify patients at high risk for multidrug-resistant pathogens to minimize inappropriate empiric therapy.