Paleozoic–Mesozoic Porphyry Cu(Mo) and Mo(Cu) Deposits within the Southern Margin of the Siberian Craton: Geochemistry, Geochronology, and Petrogenesis (a Review)

Adakites, High-Nb Basalts and Copper–Gold Deposits in Magmatic Arcs and Collisional Orogens: An Overview

Adakites are Y- and Yb-depleted, SiO2- and Sr-enriched rocks with elevated Sr/Y and La/Yb ratios originally thought to represent partial melts of subducted metabasalt, based on their association with the subduction of young (<25 Ma) and hot oceanic crust. Later, adakites were found in arc segments associated with oblique, slow and flat subduction, arc–transform intersections, collision zones and post-collisional extensional environments. New models of adakite petrogenesis include the melting of thickened and delaminated mafic lower crust, basalt underplating of the continental crust and high-pressure fractionation (amphibole ± garnet) of mantle-derived, hydrous mafic melts. In some cases, adakites are associated with Nb-enriched (10 ppm < Nb < 20 ppm) and high-Nb (Nb > 20 ppm) arc basalts in ancient and modern subduction zones (HNBs). Two types of HNBs are recognized on the basis of their geochemistry. Type I HNBs (Kamchatka, Honduras) share N-MORB-like isotopic and OIB-like trace element characteristics and most probably originate from adakite-contaminated mantle sources. Type II HNBs (Sulu arc, Jamaica) display high-field strength element enrichments in respect to island-arc basalts coupled with enriched, OIB-like isotopic signatures, suggesting derivation from asthenospheric mantle sources in arcs. Adakites and, to a lesser extent, HNBs are associated with Cu–Au porphyry and epithermal deposits in Cenozoic magmatic arcs (Kamchatka, Phlippines, Indonesia, Andean margin) and Paleozoic-Mesozoic (Central Asian and Tethyan) collisional orogens. This association is believed to be not just temporal and structural but also genetic due to the hydrous (common presence of amphibole and biotite), highly oxidized (>ΔFMQ > +2) and S-rich (anhydrite in modern Pinatubo and El Chichon adakite eruptions) nature of adakite magmas. Cretaceous adakites from the Stanovoy Suture Zone in Far East Russia contain Cu–Ag–Au and Cu–Zn–Mo–Ag alloys, native Au and Pt, cupriferous Ag in association witn barite and Ag-chloride. Stanovoy adakites also have systematically higher Au contents in comparison with volcanic arc magmas, suggesting that ore-forming hydrothermal fluids responsible for Cu–Au(Mo–Ag) porphyry and epithermal mineralization in upper crustal environments could have been exsolved from metal-saturated, H2O–S–Cl-rich adakite magmas. The interaction between depleted mantle peridotites and metal-rich adakites appears to be capable of producing (under a certain set of conditions) fertile sources for HNB melts connected with some epithermal Au (Porgera) and porphyry Cu–Au–Mo (Tibet, Iran) mineralized systems in modern and ancient subduction zones.

Trace Element Distribution in Magnetite Separates of Varying Origin: Genetic and Exploration Significance

Magnetite is a widespread mineral, as disseminated or massive ore. Representative magnetite samples separated from various geotectonic settings and rock-types, such as calc-alkaline and ophiolitic rocks, porphyry-Cu deposit, skarn-type, ultramafic lavas, black coastal sands, and metamorphosed Fe–Ni-laterites deposits, were investigated using SEM/EDS and ICP-MS analysis. The aim of this study was to establish potential relationships between composition, physico/chemical conditions, magnetite origin, and exploration for ore deposits. Trace elements, hosted either in the magnetite structure or as inclusions and co-existing mineral, revealed differences between magnetite separates of magmatic and hydrothermal origin, and hydrothermal magnetite separates associated with calc-alkaline rocks and ophiolites. First data on magnetite separates from coastal sands of Kos Island indicate elevated rare earth elements (REEs), Ti, and V contents, linked probably back to an andesitic volcanic source, while magnetite separated from metamorphosed small Fe–Ni-laterites occurrences is REE-depleted compared to large laterite deposits. Although porphyry-Cu deposits have a common origin in a supra-subduction environment, platinum-group elements (PGEs) have not been found in many porphyry-Cu deposits. The trace element content and the presence of abundant magnetite separates provide valuable evidence for discrimination between porphyry-Cu–Au–Pd–Pt and those lacking precious metals. Thus, despite the potential re-distribution of trace elements, including REE and PGE in magnetite-bearing deposits, they may provide valuable evidence for their origin and exploration.