Risk Assessment in Monitoring of Water Analysis of a Brazilian River

Nonparametric estimation of measurement uncertainty arising from sampling

BACKGROUND

Increasingly, measurement uncertainty has been used by pure and applied analytical chemistry to ensure decision-making in commercial transactions and technical-scientific applications. Until recently, it was considered that measurement uncertainty boiled down to analytical uncertainty; however, over the last two decades, uncertainty arising from sampling has also been considered. However, the second version of the EURACHEM guide, published in 2019, assumes that the frequency distribution is approximately normal or can be normalized through logarithmic transformations, without treating data that deviate from the normality.

RESULTS

Here, six examples (four from Eurachem guide) were treated by classical ANOVA and submitted to an innovative nonparametric approach for estimating the uncertainty contribution arising from sampling. Based on bootstrapping method, confidence intervals were used to guarantee metrological compatibility between the uncertainty ratios arising from the results of the traditional parametric tests and the unprecedented proposed nonparametric methodology.

SIGNIFICANCE AND NOVELTY

The present study proposed an innovative methodology for covering this gap in the literature based on nonparametric statistics (NONPANOVA) using the median absolute deviation concepts. Supplementary material based on Excel spreadsheets was developed, assisting users in the statistical treatment of their real examples.

Data reconciliation connected to guard bands to set specification limits related to risk assessment for radiopharmaceutical activity

Radiopharmaceuticals have been used to diagnose several diseases, particularly because the procedure is non-invasive. However, it is important that the correct amount of radiopharmaceutical is used to avoid inaccurate diagnostic results and suboptimal therapeutic outcomes. The amount of the radiopharmaceutical is measured when produced (by the supplier) and a second time (by the receiver), before it's use. When measured at the receiver, the result is corrected for its normal radioactivity decay. Even then, it is possible that both measurements should be considered nominal different or even statistically different when compared through various statistical tools. This research combines two innovative techniques in the field of clinical metrology. The first technique is data reconciliation, which not only enhances measurement accuracy but also reduces measurement uncertainty. The second technique involves using uncertainty information to establish specification limits for compliance assessments. In this way, our proposal aimed to minimize the risk of making incorrect decisions regarding the conformity of the concentration of radiopharmaceutical activity, that is, rejecting an item or batch that is within specification or accepting an item or batch that is outside of specification. A spreadsheet, based on these metrology fundamentals, is available to help the user with the calculations, presenting numerical and graphical results for some common radioisotopes. Reliable specification limits can be calculated and used to determine if the radiopharmaceutical is in accordance with its proposed application.