Effect of Preoperative Immunonutrition on Postoperative Major Morbidity after Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC in Patients with Peritoneal Metastasis

Effect of perioperative immunonutrition intervention among gynecological cancer patients: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Gynecologic cancer (GC) patients often experience systemic inflammation, malnutrition, and compromised postoperative outcomes. This systematic review aims to comprehensively synthesize existing data regarding the impact of perioperative immunonutrition (IMN) intervention on GC patients.

METHODS

The databases of CENTRAL, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were used to conduct a literature search, supplemented by internet search engines and manual searches. Publications released between January 2009 and October 2023 was identified, reviewed, and data extracted.

RESULTS

The review encompasses six studies involving 712 patients, comprising two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), two prospective studies, and two retrospective cohort studies. Three studies prescribed IMN perioperatively; two pre-operatively and one post-operatively. Four out of six studies reported less post-operative infection and complications. Two studies reported shorter hospitalization using the IMN formula. One study reported a longer hospitalization with IMN supplementation. Overall survival showed no significant difference in the two studies. Four studies reported positive modulation of inflammatory markers and lymphocytes as outcomes, with IMN formulas.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Perioperative IMN emerge as a promising intervention, demonstrating notable benefits included shortened hospitalization as well and positive modulation of inflammatory markers.

Nutrition Care for the Patient Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

The treatment for peritoneal malignancies has evolved over the years with the growing success of cytoreductive surgery combined with the use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Patients receiving this treatment are at risk for developing malnutrition not only due to the areas of tumor involvement but also due to the risk of undernutrition if nutritional interventions are not timely or fall short of their goal. Malnutrition leads to a gamut of health consequences. Understanding peritoneal malignancies, cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, as well as the latest nutrition research may lead to a focus on the prevention or attenuation of the procedure's associated malnutrition risk. Reducing the effects of malnutrition in these patients is the goal of the nutrition support practitioner.

Perioperative nutritional assessment and interventions in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal carcinomatosis is a catabolic state and cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is a high morbidity operation. Optimising perioperative nutrition is crucial to improve outcomes. This systematic review sought to examine literature describing clinical outcomes related to preoperative nutrition status and nutrition interventions in patients undergoing CRS with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

METHODS

A systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (300326). A search of eight electronic databases was undertaken on 8th May 2022 and reported according to the PRISMA statement. Studies reporting nutrition status through use of screening and assessment tools, nutrition interventions or nutrition-related clinical outcomes for patients undergoing CRS with HIPEC were included.

RESULTS

Of 276 screened studies, 25 studies were included for review. Commonly used nutrition assessment tools for CRS-HIPEC patients included Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), sarcopenia assessment with computed tomography, preoperative albumin, and body mass index (BMI). Three retrospective studies compared SGA with postoperative outcomes. Malnourished patients were more likely to have postoperative infectious complications (p = 0.042 SGA-B, p = 0.025 SGA-C). Malnutrition was significantly associated with increased hospital length of stay (LOS) in two studies (p = 0.006, p = 0.02), and with overall survival in another study (p = 0.006). Eight studies analysing preoperative albumin levels reported conflicting associations with postoperative outcomes. BMI in five studies was not associated with morbidity. One study did not support routine nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative nutritional assessment tools, including SGA and objective sarcopaenia measures, have a role in predicting nutritional status for CRS-HIPEC patients. Optimisation of nutrition is important for preventing complications.

Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating Perioperative Immunonutrition for Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC)

BACKGROUND

Immunonutrition has been shown to reduce hospital stay and postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing gastrointestinal, and head and neck surgery. However, its use has not been demonstrated in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). This study aims to determine the effectiveness of perioperative immunonutrition on patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC in reducing length of hospitalization and postoperative complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From April 2017 to December 2018, patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC for peritoneal metastases in a single center were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial. Patients with evidence of intestinal obstruction or with diabetes mellitus were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion to receive perioperative oral immunonutrition or standard nutritional feeds. Length of hospital stay and rates of wound infection and complications were recorded and compared between the two groups in an intention-to-treat manner.

RESULTS

A total of 62 patients were recruited and randomized into two groups. Compliance to nutritional feeds in the preoperative period was significantly higher in the standard nutrition group (95.2% versus 75.4%, p = 0.004). There was no difference in postoperative compliance rates. Length of hospital stay and rates of wound infection and postoperative complications were higher in the standard nutrition group when compared with patients on immunonutrition (15.5 versus 11.1 days, p = 0.186; 19% versus 9.7%, p = 0.473; 16% versus 9.7%, p = 0.653; respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC who received perioperative immunonutrition had shorter hospitalization and less wound infections and postoperative complications, although the differences with the standard nutrition group were not statistically significant. Potential benefits of perioperative immunonutrition need to be further evaluated in larger studies.

Prehabilitation to Improve Outcomes of Patients with Gynaecological Cancer: A New Window of Opportunity?

The literature evaluating the effect of prehabilitation programmes on postoperative outcomes and quality of life of patients with gynaecological cancer undergoing surgery was reviewed. Databases including Pubmed, Medline, EMBASE (Ovid) and PsycINFO were systematically searched to identify studies evaluating the effect of prehabilitation programmes on patients with gynaecological cancer. Both unimodal and multimodal prehabilitation programmes were included encompassing physical exercise and nutritional and psychological support. Primary outcomes were surgical complications and quality of life. Secondary outcomes were anthropometric changes and adherence to the prehabilitation programme. Seven studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, comprising 580 patients. Included studies were nonrandomised prospective studies (n = 4), retrospective studies (n = 2) and one case report. Unimodal programmes and multimodal programmes were included. In patients with ovarian cancer, multimodal prehabilitation resulted in significantly reduced hospital stay and time to chemotherapy. In patients with endometrial and cervical cancer, prehabilitation was associated with significant weight loss, but had no significant effects on surgical complications or mortality. No adverse events of the programmes were reported. Evidence on the effect of prehabilitation for patients with gynaecological cancer is limited. Future studies are needed to determine the effects on postoperative complications and quality of life.