Complementary Feeding: Recommendations for the Introduction of Allergenic Foods and Gluten in the Preterm Infant

Complementary Feeding: Tradition, Innovation and Pitfalls

According to WHO, "complementary feeding (CF) is the process starting when breast milk alone or infant formula alone is no longer sufficient to meet the nutritional requirements of infants, and therefore, other foods and liquids are needed, along with breast human milk or a breastmilk substitute". CF is one of the most important "critical and sensitive periods" in human life: indeed, timing and approaches to solid foods introduction in an infant's nutrition are of utmost importance as potential epigenetic factors from infancy to adulthood. CF is also deeply influenced by each country and single-family traditions, culture, and beliefs. The aim of our narrative review is to analyze traditional CF practices, including innovative and alternative ones that emerged in the last decades, such as baby-led weaning or plant-based weaning, and to evaluate their effects on the risk of developing non-communicable diseases. Moreover, we will discuss pitfalls and misunderstandings that pediatricians frequently have to face when dealing with complementary feeding. Health care professionals must not have prejudices against parents' wishes or traditions about CF; rather, they should support and educate them in case of any alternative CF choice, always pursuing the infant's adequate growth, neuro- and taste development, and the achievement of correct eating behavior as the primary goal.

Complementary feeding in preterm infants: a position paper by Italian neonatal, paediatric and paediatric gastroenterology joint societies

Nutrition in the first 1000 days of life is essential to ensure appropriate growth rates, prevent adverse short- and long-term outcomes, and allow physiologic neurocognitive development. Appropriate management of early nutritional needs is particularly crucial for preterm infants. Although the impact of early nutrition on health outcomes in preterm infants is well established, evidence-based recommendations on complementary feeding for preterm neonates and especially extremely low birth weight and extremely low gestational age neonates are still lacking. In the present position paper we performed a narrative review to summarize current evidence regarding complementary feeding in preterm neonates and draw recommendation shared by joint societies (SIP, SIN and SIGENP) for paediatricians, healthcare providers and families with the final aim to reduce the variability of attitude and timing among professionals.

Feeding practices and the prevalence of cow's milk protein allergy in Irish preterm infants

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of cow's-milk protein allergy (CMPA) is between 2% and 3% and symptoms vary depending on underlying immune mechanism at play. Breast milk is the optimal nutrition for premature infants and breast milk fortifiers (BMF) are commonly used to optimise growth and nutrition. BMF are typically derived from cow's milk and, as such, preterm infants are exposed to cow's milk in the first weeks of life. Previously, preterm infants were suspected to have a higher risk of allergen development because of early antigen exposure and increased gut permeability. The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence of CMPA among very preterm (<32 weeks) and/or very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. The secondary aim was to describe feeding practices, specifically the breastfeeding rates and specialist, non-standard formula use in this cohort over the first 6 months of life.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study performed in a large tertiary maternity hospital (8500 deliveries/year and 110 very preterm infants/year) in Dublin, Ireland over a 3-year period, 2017-2020. Infants born very preterm and/or VLBW who were followed in the outpatient clinic until 6 months corrected gestational age (CGA) were included. Hospital ethical approval was obtained.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-four infants were included with a median birth weight of 1338 g. No infant had a diagnosis of CMPA when leaving the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) but, by 6 months CGA, this increased to 1.4% (n = 2). Upon discharge from the NICU, 88 infants (61%) were receiving at least some breast milk, decreasing to 13 (9.1%) at 6 months CGA. Those who were receiving exclusive breast milk at discharge were significantly more likely to still be receiving any breast milk at three (p ≤ 0.001) and 6 months ( p ≤ 0.001) CGA compared to those combined feeding or exclusively formula feeding. At 6 months CGA, 18.9% (n = 27) were attending a dietician and 31.5% (n = 45) were using specialist, non-standard infant formula.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of CMPA in this cohort was 1.4%, which is similar to the reported prevalence of CMPA in the general paediatric population. Infants who were discharged from NICU exclusively breastfeeding were more likely to be receiving any breast milk at outpatient follow-up. This highlights the importance of on going dietetic and lactation support in the outpatient setting for this vulnerable cohort.