Evaluating Alternate Methods of Determining the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Contact Lens Care Products against Acanthamoeba Trophozoites

Complete Recovery of Acanthamoeba Motility among Surviving Organisms after Contact Lens Care Disinfection

Acanthamoeba keratitis is a sight-threatening infection of the cornea which is extremely challenging to treat. Understanding this organism's responses during contact lens contact and disinfection could enhance our understanding of how Acanthamoebae colonize contact lens cases, better inform us on contact lens care solution (CLC) efficacy, and help us better understand the efficacy required of CLC products. To explore this gap in knowledge, we used Acanthamoeba ATCC 30461 and ATCC 50370 trophozoites to examine Acanthamoeba behavior during and after CLC disinfection. Amoebae were added to sterile aluminum flow cells and flow cell solutions were changed to Ringer's solution (control), or one of four CLCs based on biocides (PHMB, PAPB/Polyquad, Polyquad/Aldox, or Polyquad/Alexidine) for 6 h. Each flow cell solution was then changed to axenic culture media (AC6) for 12 h to determine the behavior of amoebae following disinfection. Distance, speed, and displacement were calculated for each organism. As compared to the control of one-quarter Ringer's solution, each CLC significantly impacted Acanthamoeba motility in both the CLC and AC6 conditions. However, the amoebae challenged with the PHMB CLC traveled a significantly greater total distance than with the other three CLCs, indicating differences in effectiveness between biocides. Furthermore, amoebae regaining motility post-disinfection by CLCs were observed to travel considerable distances and thus could be considered dangerous to ocular health. We determined that while all CLCs produced a substantial or complete cessation of movement vs. the control condition during disinfection, those which relied on the Polyquad biocides were the most effective, and that any amoebae which survived disinfection were able to recover motility. Future examinations of these findings should include direct correlations between motility and viability, and how infectivity and motility may be related.

Reduction of disinfection efficacy of contact lens care products on the global market in the presence of contact lenses and cases

Objective

Sight-threatening infections can be caused by pathogenic micro-organisms colonising the cornea, leading to microbial keratitis (MK). These micro-organisms can be introduced to the eye via improper contact lens use and care. MK can also result from ineffective contact lens care solutions (CLCs), even if the patient is following best practice guidelines. Therefore, it is critical to understand the differences between the effectiveness of popular CLCs on the global market.

Methods and analysis

Following the International Standards Organisation standards 14 729 and 18259, bacteria (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Serratia marcescens, Staphylococcus aureus), fungi (Candida albicans, Fusarium strains) and Acanthamoeba strains were inoculated into each CLC with and without contact lenses, and held for the manufacturer’s stated disinfection time. Plate counts were conducted to determine the number of surviving micro-organisms.

Results

All CLCs examined met the primary log reduction criteria during stand-alone testing for Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Candida and Fusarium. renu Multiplus, All Clean Soft, and Kombilösung Super did not meet the primary criteria when challenged with Serratia. Only OPTI-FREE Express exceeded 4 log reduction for both strains of Acanthamoeba tested. We noted a substantial reduction in disinfection efficacy when CLCs were challenged with Fusarium in the presence of lenses and cases versus stand-alone testing. OPTI-FREE Express demonstrated significantly less net log reduction loss than the other four CLCs tested.

Conclusion

Of the popular CLCs on the global market, the product which relies on dual biocides polyquaternium-1 and myristamidopropyl dimethylamine demonstrated the highest disinfection efficacy in microbial disinfection challenges in the absence and presence of contact lenses.

Differential Antimicrobial Efficacy of Preservative-Free Contact Lens Disinfection Systems against Common Ocular Pathogens

Microbial keratitis is a devastating disease that can cause eye damage and blindness and can be the result of infections by several common ocular pathogens. Importantly, some of these pathogens, such as Acanthamoeba, are particularly unsusceptible to biocides in common contact lens care solutions. Therefore, the disinfection efficacy of preservative-free (PF) disinfection systems against bacteria, fungi, and Acanthamoeba trophozoites and cysts should be assessed as products with the most potential to be efficacious against resistant organisms. PF disinfection systems were analyzed for antimicrobial efficacy. These were the one-step (hydrogen peroxide-based) Clear Care and Clear Care Plus systems and the two-step (povidone-iodine-based) Cleadew system. Stand-alone challenges using bacteria, fungi, and Acanthamoeba were prepared according to the International Standards Organization method 14729. These same challenges were also conducted in the presence of the following contact lenses: Boston RGP, Acuvue Oasys, Biofinity, Ultra, and 2-week PremiO. All challenges were performed at the manufacturer's recommended disinfection time. All preservative-free disinfection systems demonstrated similarly high rates of antimicrobial efficacy when challenged with bacteria or fungi, with or without lenses. However, both Clear Care and Clear Care Plus demonstrated significantly greater disinfection efficacy against Acanthamoeba trophozoites and cysts, with and without lenses (P < 0.05). Cleadew efficacy was impacted by the addition of contact lenses, whereas Clear Care/Clear Care Plus maintained similar efficacies in the absence or presence of lenses. While both hydrogen peroxide and povidone-iodine are highly effective against bacteria and fungi, hydrogen peroxide maintains significantly greater disinfection capabilities than povidone-iodine against all forms of Acanthamoeba. IMPORTANCE Understanding the most efficacious products will allow clinicians to best communicate to patients and consumers the safest products on the market to reduce adverse events, including microbial keratitis, during contact lens use.

Differential Antimicrobial Efficacy of Multipurpose Solutions against Acanthamoeba Trophozoites

SIGNIFICANCE

This investigation examines the effectiveness of several common contact lens solutions in the disinfection of Acanthamoeba, which causes a serious eye infection most often resulting from dysfunctional or improper use of contact lens products.

PURPOSE

Acanthamoeba keratitis is an eye infection caused by a free-living amoeba, which can lead to extensive corneal damage and frequently blindness. Acanthamoeba keratitis is linked with contact lens use combined with noncompliance with contact lens care cleaning regimens. The patient's choice and use of multipurpose solutions (MPSs) continue to be a risk factor for Acanthamoeba keratitis. Thus, it is critical that the Acanthamoeba disinfection efficacy of the popular MPSs be determined. Here we compare the efficacy of seven major MPSs on the global market.

METHODS

Using standard methods of Acanthamoeba disinfection and quantification, Acanthamoeba ATCC 30461, 30868, 50370, and 50676 trophozoites were inoculated into each MPS and held for the manufacturer's recommended disinfection time. Acanthamoeba recovery plates were incubated for 14 days, after which positive wells were identified and cell concentrations determined using the 50% endpoint method.

RESULTS

Members of the OPTI-FREE products (Express, Replenish, and Puremoist [Alcon, Fort Worth, TX]) demonstrated significantly higher percentages of antimicrobial activity compared with the renu Advanced Formula (Bausch + Lomb, Rochester, NY), Biotrue (Bausch + Lomb), Acuvue RevitaLens (Johnson & Johnson, Santa Ana, CA), and Lite products (Cooper Vision, Scottsville, NY) for four of the trophozoite strains tested.

CONCLUSIONS

Many of the popular MPS biocides maintain little or no antimicrobial activity against Acanthamoeba trophozoites, and the number of biocides in an MPS does not necessarily indicate its antimicrobial activity.

Continuous Real-Time Motility Analysis of Acanthamoeba Reveals Sustained Movement in Absence of Nutrients

Acanthamoeba keratitis is a serious ocular infection which is challenging to treat and can lead to blindness. While this pathogen is ubiquitous and can contaminate contact lenses after contact with water, its habits remain elusive. Understanding this organism’s natural behavior will better inform us on how Acanthamoeba colonize contact lens care systems. Acanthamoeba trophozoites were allowed to adhere to either a glass coverslip or non-nutrient agar (NNA) within a flow cell with nutrients (Escherichia coli or an axenic culture medium (AC6)) or without nutrients (Ringer’s solution). Images were taken once every 24 s over 12 h and compiled, and videos were analyzed using ImageJ Trackmate software. Acanthamoeba maintained continuous movement for the entire 12 h period. ATCC 50370 had limited differences between conditions and surfaces throughout the experiment. Nutrient differences had a noticeable impact for ATCC 30461, where E. coli resulted in the highest total distance and speed during the early periods of the experiment but had the lowest total distance and speed by 12 h. The Ringer’s and AC6 conditions were the most similar between strains, while Acanthamoeba in the E. coli and NNA conditions demonstrated significant differences between strains (p < 0.05). These results indicate that quantifiable visual tracking of Acanthamoeba may be a novel and robust method for identifying the movement of Acanthamoeba in relation to contact lens care products. The present study indicates that Acanthamoeba can undertake sustained movement for at least 12 h with and without nutrients, on both rough and smooth surfaces, and that different strains have divergent behavior.

Variables Affecting the Recovery of Acanthamoeba Trophozoites

While the results of Acanthamoeba testing have been extensively published, laboratories conducting such testing are left to develop their own methods in the absence of a standardized methodology. The wide disparity of methods has resulted in equally inconsistent reported results for contact lens care (CLC) products. This study's objective was to determine the source of these discrepancies by evaluating basic Acanthamoeba biology and their impact on antimicrobial efficacy testing, including the ability of a recovery method to stimulate a single trophozoite to proliferate. Antimicrobial efficacy testing was conducted using well-published Acanthamoeba strains, storage conditions, and growth-based recovery methods. To identify variables that influence results, test solutions with low Acanthamoeba disinfection rates were utilized to prevent differences from being masked by high log reductions. In addition, single-cell proliferation assays were executed to understand the growth requirements to stimulate trophozoite propagation in two recovery methods. These studies indicated that both nutrient density (>106 CFU) and the length of plate incubation (at least 14 days) could significantly influence the accurate recovery of trophozoites. Together, this study emphasizes the need to understand how Acanthamoeba trophozoites biology can impact test methods to create divergent results.