1
|
De Pascalis R, Bhargava V, Espich S, Wu TH, Gelhaus HC, Elkins KL. In vivo and in vitro immune responses against Francisella tularensis vaccines are comparable among Fischer 344 rat substrains. Front Microbiol 2023; 14:1224480. [PMID: 37547680 PMCID: PMC10400713 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1224480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Identifying suitable animal models and standardizing preclinical methods are important for the generation, characterization, and development of new vaccines, including those against Francisella tularensis. Non-human primates represent an important animal model to evaluate tularemia vaccine efficacy, and the use of correlates of vaccine-induced protection may facilitate bridging immune responses from non-human primates to people. However, among small animals, Fischer 344 rats represent a valuable resource for initial studies to evaluate immune responses, to identify correlates of protection, and to screen novel vaccines. In this study, we performed a comparative analysis of three Fischer rat substrains to determine potential differences in immune responses, to evaluate methods used to quantify potential correlates of protection, and to evaluate protection after vaccination. To this end, we took advantage of data previously generated using one of the rat substrains by evaluating two live vaccines, LVS and F. tularensis SchuS4-ΔclpB (ΔclpB). We compared immune responses after primary vaccination, adaptive immune responses upon re-stimulation of leukocytes in vitro, and sensitivity to aerosol challenge. Despite some detectable differences, the results highlight the similarity of immune responses to tularemia vaccines and challenge outcomes between the three substrains, indicating that all offer acceptable and comparable approaches as animal models to study Francisella infection and immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto De Pascalis
- Laboratory of Mucosal Pathogens and Cellular Immunology, Division of Bacterial, Parasitic and Allergenic Products, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States
| | - Varunika Bhargava
- Laboratory of Mucosal Pathogens and Cellular Immunology, Division of Bacterial, Parasitic and Allergenic Products, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States
| | - Scott Espich
- Laboratory of Mucosal Pathogens and Cellular Immunology, Division of Bacterial, Parasitic and Allergenic Products, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States
| | - Terry H. Wu
- Center for Infectious Disease and Immunity and Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States
| | | | - Karen L. Elkins
- Laboratory of Mucosal Pathogens and Cellular Immunology, Division of Bacterial, Parasitic and Allergenic Products, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bachert BA, Richardson JB, Mlynek KD, Klimko CP, Toothman RG, Fetterer DP, Luquette AE, Chase K, Storrs JL, Rogers AK, Cote CK, Rozak DA, Bozue JA. Development, Phenotypic Characterization and Genomic Analysis of a Francisella tularensis Panel for Tularemia Vaccine Testing. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:725776. [PMID: 34456897 PMCID: PMC8386241 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.725776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Francisella tularensis is one of several biothreat agents for which a licensed vaccine is needed to protect against this pathogen. To aid in the development of a vaccine protective against pneumonic tularemia, we generated and characterized a panel of F. tularensis isolates that can be used as challenge strains to assess vaccine efficacy. Our panel consists of both historical and contemporary isolates derived from clinical and environmental sources, including human, tick, and rabbit isolates. Whole genome sequencing was performed to assess the genetic diversity in comparison to the reference genome F. tularensis Schu S4. Average nucleotide identity analysis showed >99% genomic similarity across the strains in our panel, and pan-genome analysis revealed a core genome of 1,707 genes, and an accessory genome of 233 genes. Three of the strains in our panel, FRAN254 (tick-derived), FRAN255 (a type B strain), and FRAN256 (a human isolate) exhibited variation from the other strains. Moreover, we identified several unique mutations within the Francisella Pathogenicity Island across multiple strains in our panel, revealing unexpected diversity in this region. Notably, FRAN031 (Scherm) completely lacked the second pathogenicity island but retained virulence in mice. In contrast, FRAN037 (Coll) was attenuated in a murine pneumonic tularemia model and had mutations in pdpB and iglA which likely led to attenuation. All of the strains, except FRAN037, retained full virulence, indicating their effectiveness as challenge strains for future vaccine testing. Overall, we provide a well-characterized panel of virulent F. tularensis strains that can be utilized in ongoing efforts to develop an effective vaccine against pneumonic tularemia to ensure protection is achieved across a range F. tularensis strains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beth A. Bachert
- Division of Bacteriology, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, MD, United States
| | - Joshua B. Richardson
- Center for Genome Sciences, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, MD, United States
| | - Kevin D. Mlynek
- Division of Bacteriology, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, MD, United States
| | - Christopher P. Klimko
- Division of Bacteriology, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, MD, United States
| | - Ronald G. Toothman
- Division of Bacteriology, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, MD, United States
| | - David P. Fetterer
- Division of Biostatistics, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, MD, United States
| | - Andrea E. Luquette
- Biodefense Reference Material Repository, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, MD, United States
| | - Kitty Chase
- Biodefense Reference Material Repository, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, MD, United States
| | - Jessica L. Storrs
- Biodefense Reference Material Repository, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, MD, United States
| | - Ashley K. Rogers
- Biodefense Reference Material Repository, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, MD, United States
| | - Christopher K. Cote
- Division of Bacteriology, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, MD, United States
| | - David A. Rozak
- Biodefense Reference Material Repository, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, MD, United States
| | - Joel A. Bozue
- Division of Bacteriology, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|