Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy between Preserved and Preservative-Free Latanoprost and Preservative-Free Tafluprost

Ocular Surface Disease in Glaucoma Patients

PURPOSE

To review the most recent studies in the literature regarding the ocular surface in glaucoma patients and treatment options aimed to reduce ocular surface disease in this population.

METHODS

We performed a literature search in the electronic databases of PubMed CENT RAL, Google Scholar, EMBASE the Register of Controlled Trials, and Ovid MEDLINE using the following terms: "ocular surface", "dry eye", "glaucoma", "selective laser trabeculoplasty", "glaucoma surgery", "preservatives", "preservative free", "ocular surface disease index", "tear break up time", "MMP-9" and "conjunctival hyperemia".

RESULTS

Over the last several years, several studies have demonstrated the changes to the ocular surface in the setting of glaucoma, the best tests for markers of dry eye, and how management can be altered to help address ocular surface disease routinely or in preparation for glaucoma surgery.

CONCLUSION

Ocular surface disease in the glaucoma patient population is widely recognized. It should be addressed to maximize patient compliance and quality of life.

Reviewing the evidence surrounding preservative-free tafluprost/timolol fixed-dose combination therapy in open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension management: a focus on efficacy, safety and tolerability

INTRODUCTION

Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) is the most important modifiable risk factor for irreversible sight loss in open angle glaucoma (OAG). The topical fixed-dose combination (FC) of preservative-free (PF) tafluprost (0.0015%) and timolol (0.5%) (tafluprost/timolol) is among the second-line IOP-lowering options for OAG and ocular hypertension (OHT).

AREAS COVERED

PubMed searches identified publications reporting key evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world studies examining the safety, tolerability and IOP-lowering efficacy of PF tafluprost/timolol FC therapy in OAG/OHT management.

EXPERT OPINION

Glaucoma patients are more likely to have ocular surface disease and treatment should be individualized so that target response may be achieved while considering tolerability and quality of life, according to European Glaucoma Society guidelines. PF FC therapies, such as PF tafluprost/timolol FC, avoid ocular surface exposure to toxic preservative agents and reduce the required number of treatment administrations. These properties may enhance treatment tolerability and adherence, resulting in improved IOP-lowering efficacy and disease control. Treatment outcomes from RCTs and real-world studies examining PF tafluprost/timolol FC therapy support this hypothesis, with significant IOP reductions and/or improvements in tolerability parameters demonstrated, regardless of the prior topical therapy used and even when switched directly to PF tafluprost/timolol FC treatment (without washout).

Aqueous Prostaglandin Eye Drop Formulations

Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of irreversible blindness worldwide. It is characterized by progressive optic neuropathy in association with damage to the optic nerve head and, subsequently, visual loss if it is left untreated. Among the drug classes used for the long-term treatment of open-angle glaucoma, prostaglandin analogues (PGAs) are the first-line treatment and are available as marketed eye drop formulations for intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction by increasing the trabecular and uveoscleral outflow. PGAs have low aqueous solubility and are very unstable (i.e., hydrolysis) in aqueous solutions, which may hamper their ocular bioavailability and decrease their chemical stability. Additionally, treatment with PGA in conventional eye drops is associated with adverse effects, such as conjunctival hyperemia and trichiasis. It has been a very challenging for formulation scientists to develop stable aqueous eye drop formulations that increase the PGAs' solubility and enhance their therapeutic efficacy while simultaneously lowering their ocular side effects. Here the physiochemical properties and chemical stabilities of the commercially available PGAs are reviewed, and the compositions of their eye drop formulations are discussed. Furthermore, the novel PGA formulations for glaucoma treatment are reviewed.

Long-term Effects of Latanoprost with Different Excipient Compositions on Intraocular Pressure, Hyperemia and Discomfort

Purpose: To compare the long-term effects of two preservative-free 0.005% latanoprost ophthalmic solutions with different excipient compositions on intraocular pressure (IOP), conjunctival hyperemia, and subjective ocular discomfort.Methods: The medical records of patients newly diagnosed with normal tension glaucoma or primary open angle glaucoma who started treatment using Xalost S® or Monoprost® were reviewed. IOP was measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Conjunctival hyperemia was measured with a Keratograph® 5M and subjective ocular discomfort was surveyed using a visual analog scale. Routine examinations were scheduled 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. A generalized estimating equation was used to evaluate the changes of these parameters with time.Results: Xalost S® was used in 31 patients (60 eyes) and Monoprost® in 27 patients (50 eyes). The baseline characteristics were generally similar in the two groups with no significant differences. In the Xalost S® group, the IOP difference from baseline was significant at all time points (p < 0.001). However, in the Monoprost® group, after 1 month of treatment, the IOP difference decreased significantly (p = 0.054 at 1 week; p = 0.005 at 1 month; p < 0.001 after 1 month). Conjunctival hyperemia and subjective ocular discomfort did not differ significantly from baseline in either group.Conclusions: There was no significant difference in the frequency of side effects between the two drugs. The effect on the IOP drop was similar over time, but the initial IOP drop was greater in the Xalost S® group. This difference is presumed to be due to the different excipient compositions of the two drugs.

Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Tafluprost, Travoprost, and Latanoprost in Korean Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Normal-Tension Glaucoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study (LOTUS Study)

This multicenter retrospective cohort study compared the effectiveness and safety of long-term tafluprost, travoprost, or latanoprost in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or normal-tension glaucoma (NTG). Data were extracted from electronic medical records of 300 patients treated with tafluprost, travoprost, or latanoprost for >6 months. Propensity matching for age and sex was used for effectiveness and safety comparisons. The primary endpoint was visual field (VF) progression via mean deviation (MD) slope. Secondary endpoints were change of MD, intraocular pressure, pattern standard deviation, VF index, and advanced glaucoma intervention study score. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were also compared between groups. Overall, 216 POAG or NTG patients were matched into Match Set 1 (72 patients/group), and 177 NTG-only patients in Match Set 2 (59 patients/group) according to: age (mean: 61, 62 years) and sex (male: 53, 56%). There were no statistically significant between-group differences regarding MD slope (p = 0.413, p = 0.374 in Match Sets 1 and 2, respectively). There were no significant between-group differences/tendencies regarding secondary endpoints. No AEs were serious, and there were no significant between-group differences regarding reported AEs. In patients with POAG or NTG, long-term tafluprost, travoprost, or latanoprost showed similar effects. All three prostaglandin analogs had good long-term safety profiles.