Early Use of Low-Dose Ruxolitinib: A Promising Strategy for the Treatment of Acute and Chronic GVHD

Ruxolitinib for the treatment of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease in children: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

Steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (SR-GvHD) represents a major complication of pediatric allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Ruxolitinib, a selective JAK 1-2 inhibitor, showed promising results in the treatment of SR-GvHD in adult trial, including patients >12 years old. This systematic review aims to evaluate ruxolitinib use for SR-GvHD in the pediatric population. Among the 12 studies included, ruxolitinib administration presented slight differences. Overall response rate (ORR) ranged from 45% to 100% in both acute and chronic GvHD. Complete response rates (CR) varied from 9% to 67% and from 0% to 28% in aGvHD and cGvHD, respectively. Individual-patient meta-analysis from 108 children under 12 years showed an ORR and CR for aGvHD of 74% and 56%, respectively, while in cGvHD ORR was 78% but with only 11% achieving CR. Treatment-related toxicities were observed in 20% of patients, including cytopenia, liver toxicity, and infections. Age, weight, graft source, previous lines of therapy, and dose did not significantly predict response, while a higher rate of toxicities was observed in aGvHD patients. In conclusion, ruxolitinib shows promising results in the treatment of SR-GvHD in children, including those under 12 years. Specific pediatric perspective trials are currently ongoing to definitely assess its efficacy and safety.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Ruxolitinib: A Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Ruxolitinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting the Janus kinase (JAK) and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathways. Ruxolitinib is used to treat myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera and steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease in the setting of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. This review describes the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ruxolitinib.

METHODS

Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and web of Science were searched from the time of database inception to march 15, 2021 and was repeated on November 16, 2021. Articles not written in English, animal or in vitro studies, letters to the editor, case reports, where ruxolitinib was not used for hematological diseases or not available as full text were excluded.

RESULTS

Ruxolitinib is well absorbed, has 95% bio-availability, and is bound to albumin for 97%. Ruxolitinib pharmacokinetics can be described with a two-compartment model and linear elimination. Volume of distribution differs between men and women, likely related to bodyweight differences. Metabolism is mainly hepatic via CYP3A4 and can be altered by CYP3A4 inducers and inhibitors. The major metabolites of ruxolitinib are pharmacologically active. The main route of elimination of ruxolitinib metabolites is renal. Liver and renal dysfunction affect some of the pharmacokinetic variables and require dose reductions. Model-informed precision dosing might be a way to further optimize and individualize ruxolitinib treatment, but is not yet advised for routine care due to lack of information on target concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Further research is needed to explain the interindividual variability of the ruxolitinib pharmacokinetic variables and to optimize individual treatment.

Population pharmacokinetics of ruxolitinib in children with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: focus on the drug-drug interactions

PURPOSE

The optimal dose regimen of ruxolitinib (RUX) in children with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) remains to be determined. The aim was to develop and verify a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model, and then provide references for the optimization of dose regimen of RUX in children with HLH.

METHODS

A total of 189 RUX concentrations from 32 children were included. The PPK model was established using the nonlinear mixed-effects model approach. Predictive performance and stability of the final PPK model were evaluated. The exposure of RUX in different clinical scenarios was simulated through Monte Carlo simulations.

RESULTS

A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and linear elimination was identified to describe the disposition of RUX. The absorption rate constant (K_a) in the final PPK model was 1.05 h^-1, and the apparent clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (V/F) were 9.80 L/h and 30.6 L, respectively. Coadministration with triazoles (TZS) and azithromycin (AZM) resulted in approximately 31.0% and 32.4% reductions in the CL/F of RUX, respectively. Multiple evaluation procedures showed satisfactory predictive performance and stability of the final model. Monte Carlo simulations showed that the exposure of RUX was significantly affected by the coadministration with TZS and/or AZM under different clinical scenarios.

CONCLUSION

For the first time, a PPK model of RUX in children with HLH was developed and evaluated. The coadministration with TZS and/or AZM were found to reduce the clearance of RUX in children. These findings could provide new insights for the precise treatment of RUX in children with HLH.