Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Zaltoprofen in Healthy Adults: Exploring the Dosage Regimen

Population Pharmacokinetics of Loxoprofen and its alcoholic metabolites in healthy Korean men

BACKGROUND

Loxoprofen has been actively used clinically to relieve musculoskeletal pain and inflammatory symptoms. However, there are few reports on quantitative pharmacokinetic (PK) prediction tools and diversity analyzes for loxoprofen within populations.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to identify effective covariates associated with explaining inter-individual PK variability through a population pharmacokinetic (Pop-PK) modeling approach for loxoprofen, and to provide a starting point for establishing scientific dosing regimens.

METHOD

The bioequivalence PK results of loxoprofen performed on 52 healthy Korean men and the physiological and biochemical parameters derived from each individual were used as base data for the development of a Pop-PK model of loxoprofen. In order to simultaneously predict the PKs of the active form according to loxoprofen exposure, previously reported PK results of trans-alcohol loxoprofen, an active metabolite of loxoprofen, were used to expand the model.

RESULTS

The Pop-PK profiles of loxoprofen were described in terms of the basic structure of a non-sequential two absorption with 2-disposition compartment, and for inter-individual PK variations, peripheral compartment volume of distribution could be correlated with body surface area (BSA), and central compartment clearance with creatinine clearance (CrCL) and albumin levels. As a result of the model simulation, the concentrations of loxoprofen and its alcoholic metabolites in plasma significantly decreased as CrCL and albumin levels increased and decreased, respectively. On the other hand, it was confirmed that the higher the BSA, the greater the distribution of loxoprofen to the periphery, and the minimum concentrations of loxoprofen and alcoholic metabolites in plasma in steady-state increased by approximately 1.78-2 times, while the fluctuation between maximum and minimum concentrations decreased. The results suggest that patients with large BSA, impaired renal function, and high serum albumin levels may have significantly higher plasma exposure to loxoprofen and trans-alcohol loxoprofen. It was also suggested that the potential side effects in the gastrointestinal system and various tissues and the level of exposure in plasma due to long-term application of loxoprofen in this patient group could be causally explained.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a very useful starting point for a scientific precision medicine approach to loxoprofen by discovering effective covariates and establishing a quantitative model that can explain the diversity of loxoprofen PKs within the population.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The clinical study protocol used in this study was thoroughly reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Institute of Bioequivalence and Bridging Study, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea. The bioequivalence study permit numbers are as follows: 041113; 10.15.2004.

Population pharmacokinetic modeling of levodropropizine: extended application to comparative analysis between commercial formulations and exploration of pharmacokinetic effects of diet

Levodropropizine, a nonopioid antitussive agent, is being increasingly used in clinical practice with the development of several formulations for symptomatic relief of acute and chronic bronchitis. However, scientific and quantitative population pharmacokinetic analyses of levodropropizine are lacking. Moreover, no integrated quantitative comparison has been performed between formulations. This study quantitatively evaluated and predicted pharmacokinetic properties of formulations through population pharmacokinetic model-based comparisons of commercially available formulations. Plasma concentration profile results from bioequivalence studies of 60-mg immediate release (IR) levodropropizine tablets in 40 healthy Korean males were used as population pharmacokinetic modeling data. For interindividual variability in levodropropizine pharmacokinetics, body surface area was identified as an effective covariate that was positively correlated with peripheral compartment distribution volume. Population pharmacokinetic model for IR tablets well-described the levodropropizine syrup and capsule datasets, suggesting no significant differences in pharmacokinetics among IR tablets, syrups, and capsules of levodropropizine. In contrast, pharmacokinetic profiles differed between 90-mg controlled release (CR) and IR levodropropizine tablets; however, separate parameter estimation was possible by applying the same model structure. In terms of pharmacokinetics, twice-daily regimen of 90-mg CR tablets was equivalent to thrice-daily regimen of 60-mg IR tablets. However, at steady-state, interindividual plasma concentration variability within population was reduced by approximately 36.71-83.18%. For levodropropizine CR tablets, a high-fat diet significantly delayed gastrointestinal absorption but maintained overall plasma exposure equivalent. This study provides useful quantitative judgment data for precision medicine of levodropropizine and can be helpful in predicting the pharmacokinetics of levodropropizine based on commercialized formulation switching.