Efficient mRNA Delivery with mRNA Lipoplexes Prepared Using a Modified Ethanol Injection Method

Effect of vorinostat on protein expression in vitro and in vivo following mRNA lipoplex administration

Previously, we demonstrated that cationic liposomes comprised of N-hexadecyl-N,N-dimethylhexadecan-1-aminium bromide, 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine and poly(ethylene glycol) cholesteryl ether induced substantial protein expression both in vitro and in vivo following the administration of mRNA/cationic liposome complexes (mRNA lipoplexes). The present study evaluated the effect of vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, on protein expression levels in vitro and in vivo following the administration of mRNA lipoplexes. The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of vorinostat for human cervical carcinoma HeLa and human liver cancer HepG2 cells were determined to be 7.8 and 2.6 µM, respectively, following a 24 h incubation period. Treatment with 1 µM vorinostat resulted in a 2.7-fold increase in luciferase (Luc) activity for HeLa cells and a 1.6-fold increase for HepG2 cells at 24 h post-transfection with firefly Luc (FLuc) mRNA lipoplexes compared with untreated cells. However, treatment with 10 µM vorinostat decreased Luc activity compared with treatment with 1 µM vorinostat. Intravenous injection of Cy5-labeled mRNA lipoplexes into mice resulted in mRNA accumulation primarily in the lungs; however, co-injection with vorinostat at doses of 5 or 25 mg/kg resulted in mRNA accumulation in both the lungs and liver. Furthermore, intravenous injection of FLuc mRNA lipoplexes resulted in high Luc activity in both the lungs and spleen. Nevertheless, co-injection with vorinostat slightly decreased Luc activity in the lungs but not in the spleen. These findings indicated that vorinostat enhances in vitro protein expression from transfected mRNA after treatment with a lower concentration of IC50; however, it does not largely affect in vivo protein expression from the transfected mRNA.

Cancer Nanovaccines: Nanomaterials and Clinical Perspectives

Cancer nanovaccines represent a promising frontier in cancer immunotherapy, utilizing nanotechnology to augment traditional vaccine efficacy. This review comprehensively examines the current state-of-the-art in cancer nanovaccine development, elucidating innovative strategies and technologies employed in their design. It explores both preclinical and clinical advancements, emphasizing key studies demonstrating their potential to elicit robust anti-tumor immune responses. The study encompasses various facets, including integrating biomaterial-based nanocarriers for antigen delivery, adjuvant selection, and the impact of nanoscale properties on vaccine performance. Detailed insights into the complex interplay between the tumor microenvironment and nanovaccine responses are provided, highlighting challenges and opportunities in optimizing therapeutic outcomes. Additionally, the study presents a thorough analysis of ongoing clinical trials, presenting a snapshot of the current clinical landscape. By curating the latest scientific findings and clinical developments, this study aims to serve as a comprehensive resource for researchers and clinicians engaged in advancing cancer immunotherapy. Integrating nanotechnology into vaccine design holds immense promise for revolutionizing cancer treatment paradigms, and this review provides a timely update on the evolving landscape of cancer nanovaccines.

Editorial for Special Issue: "Liposomal and Lipid-Based Drug Delivery Systems and Vaccines"

Liposomes and lipid-based supramolecular systems have been used in clinical practice for more than 30 years as drug carriers and vaccines for the treatment of oncological diseases and infections [...].

Considerations on the Design of Lipid-based mRNA Vaccines Against Cancer

Throughout the last decades, mRNA vaccines have been developed as a cancer immunotherapeutic and the technology recently gained momentum during the COVID-19 pandemic. Recent promising results obtained from clinical trials investigating lipid-based mRNA vaccines in cancer therapy further highlighted the potential of this therapy. Interestingly, while the technologies being used in authorized mRNA vaccines for the prevention of COVID-19 are relatively similar, mRNA vaccines in clinical development for cancer vaccination show marked differences in mRNA modification, lipid carrier, and administration route. In this review, we describe findings on how these factors can impact the potency of mRNA vaccines in cancer therapy and provide insights into the complex interplay between them. We discuss how lipid carrier composition can affect passive targeting to immune cells to improve the efficacy and safety of mRNA vaccines. Finally, we summarize strategies that are established or still being explored to improve the efficacy of mRNA cancer vaccines and include next-generation vaccines that are on the horizon in clinical development.

mRNA vaccines and their delivery strategies: A journey from infectious diseases to cancer

mRNA vaccines have evolved as promising cancer therapies. These vaccines can encode tumor-allied antigens, thus enabling personalized treatment approaches. They can also target cancer-specific mutations and overcome immune evasion mechanisms. They manipulate the body's cellular functions to produce antigens, elicit immune responses, and suppress tumors by overcoming limitations associated with specific histocompatibility leukocyte antigen molecules. However, successfully delivering mRNA into target cells destroys a crucial challenge. Viral and nonviral vectors (lipid nanoparticles and cationic liposomes) have shown great capacity in protecting mRNA from deterioration and assisting in cellular uptake. Cell-penetrating peptides, hydrogels, polymer-based nanoparticles, and dendrimers have been investigated to increase the delivery efficacy and immunogenicity of mRNA. This comprehensive review explores the landscape of mRNA vaccines and their delivery platforms for cancer, addressing design considerations, diverse delivery strategies, and recent advancements. Overall, this review contributes to the progress of mRNA vaccines as an innovative strategy for effective cancer treatment.

Non-cellular immunotherapies in pediatric central nervous system tumors

Central nervous system (CNS) tumors are the second most common type of cancer and the most common cause of cancer death in pediatric patients. New therapies are desperately needed for some of the most malignant of all cancers. Immunotherapy has emerged in the past two decades as an additional avenue to augment/replace traditional therapies (such as chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy). This article first discusses the unique nature of the pediatric CNS immune system and how it interacts with the systemic immune system. It then goes on to review three important and widely studied types of immune therapies: checkpoint inhibitors, vaccines, and radiation therapy, and touches on early studies of antibody-mediated immunogenic therapies, Finally, the article discusses the importance of combination immunotherapy for pediatric CNS tumors, and addresses the neurologic toxicities associated with immunotherapies.