Pharmaceutical Strategies to Improve Druggability of Potential Drug Candidates in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Therapy

Efficacy and Safety of Fibroblast Growth Factor-21 Analogs for the Treatment of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-21 analogs are potential therapeutic candidates for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the FGF-21 analogs, efruxifermin, pegbelfermin, and pegozafermin for MASH treatment. A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials from five major databases was conducted. Primary efficacy outcomes focused on liver histological improvement, while secondary efficacy outcomes encompassed reductions in liver fat content and improvements in biochemical parameters. Safety outcomes examined included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), treatment-related TEAEs, TEAEs leading to discontinuation, and serious TEAEs. Eight eligible studies involving 963 patients were included in this review. Compared with the placebo group, the FGF-21 analog-treated group exhibited significantly improved primary efficacy outcomes, specifically ≥1 stage improvement in fibrosis with no worsening of MASH (risk ratio [RR] = 1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27-2.62) and at least two-point improvement in the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score with no worsening of fibrosis (RR = 2.85; 95% CI = 2.06-3.95). Despite an increased risk of TEAEs (RR = 1.17; 95% CI = 1.08-1.27) and treatment-related adverse events (RR = 1.75; 95% CI = 1.40-2.19), FGF-21 analogs exhibited an acceptable safety profile. FGF-21 analogs were significantly better in achieving liver histological improvements and beneficial biochemical outcomes compared with placebo, with a tolerable safety pattern. These findings shed light on the efficacy and safety of FGF-21 analogs and provide valuable evidence for their application as MASH therapeutics.

MAFLD Pandemic: Updates in Pharmacotherapeutic Approach Development

With around one billion of the world's population affected, the era of the metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) pandemic has entered the global stage. MAFLD is a chronic progressive liver disease with accompanying metabolic disorders such as type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity which can progress asymptomatically to liver cirrhosis and subsequently to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and for which to date there are almost no approved pharmacologic options. Because MAFLD has a very complex etiology and it also affects extrahepatic organs, a multidisciplinary approach is required when it comes to finding an effective and safe active substance for MAFLD treatment. The optimal drug for MAFLD should diminish steatosis, fibrosis and inflammation in the liver, and the winner for MAFLD drug authorisation seems to be the one that significantly improves liver histology. Saroglitazar (Lipaglyn®) was approved for metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) in India in 2020; however, the drug is still being investigated in other countries. Although the pharmaceutical industry is still lagging behind in developing an approved pharmacologic therapy for MAFLD, research has recently intensified and many molecules which are in the final stages of clinical trials are expected to be approved in the coming few years. Already this year, the first drug (Rezdiffra™) in the United States was approved via accelerated procedure for treatment of MAFLD, i.e., of MASH in adults. This review underscores the most recent information related to the development of drugs for MAFLD treatment, focusing on the molecules that have come furthest towards approval.

Integrating network pharmacology and drug side-effect data to explore mechanism of liver injury-induced by tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are highly efficient small-molecule anticancer drugs. Despite the specificity and efficacy of TKIs, they can produce off-target effects, leading to severe liver toxicity, and even some of them are labeled as black box hepatotoxicity. Thus, we focused on representative TKIs associated with severe hepatic adverse events, namely lapatinib, pazopanib, regorafenib, and sunitinib as objections of study, then integrated drug side-effect data from United State Food and Drug Administration (U.S. FDA) and network pharmacology to elucidate mechanism underlying TKI-induced liver injury. Based on network pharmacology, we constructed a specific comorbidity module of high risk of serious adverse effects and created drug-disease networks. Enrichment analysis of the networks revealed the depletion of all-trans-retinoic acid and the involvement of down-regulation of the HSP70 family-mediated endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress as key factors in TKI-induced liver injury. These results were further verified by transcription data. Based on the target prediction results of drugs and reactive metabolites, we also shed light on the association between toxic metabolites and severe hepatic adverse reactions, and thinking HSPA8, HSPA1A, CYP1A1, CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 were potential therapeutic or preventive targets against TKI-induced liver injury. In conclusion, our research provides comprehensive insights into the mechanism underlying severe liver injury caused by TKIs, offering a better understanding of how to enhance patient safety and treatment efficacy.