Benzodiazepines Withdrawal: Initial Outcomes and Long-Term Impact on Falls in a French Nursing Home

Benzodiazepine deprescription strategies in chronic users: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

As long-term use of benzodiazepines increases, adverse effects also become more frequent, especially in elderly adults. Due the potential of causing dependence, poor patient adherence and a lack of awareness of side effects, deprescription is challenging.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify what are the effective approaches to motivate and promote deprescription of benzodiazepines.

METHODS

We used MeSH terms to search in five databases that were MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, LILACS, SCIELO and Science Direct. Then, we selected articles accordingly to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Risk of bias assessment for randomized controlled trials and prospective interventional studies was made using RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tools, respectively. For cohort studies, we used the clarity group by McMaster University tool.

RESULTS

Database search retrieved 412 results, and 11 studies were selected for analysis. Interventions focusing on patient education to improve community awareness about deprescription presented better discontinuation rates and more potential on motivating discussions about deprescribing with physicians. Interventions based on counselling by different health professionals were not well evaluated as they presented four of six studies as high, serious or critical risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the comparison of different strategies was impaired by the high risk of bias in some studies, patient education focused interventions presented good results. Future studies should consider doing a follow-up of 6 months or longer with evaluation of withdrawal symptoms and sleep patterns, inclusion of young adults on the sample and some form of cognitive evaluation that might influence the results of the intervention.

Enhancing the role played by clinical pharmacists in psychiatric settings to better integrate clinical psychopharmacology into the decision-making process

The importance of clinical psychopharmacological knowledge for modern psychiatric care is both well-established and underdeveloped. Although psychiatric pharmacists are identified as experts in psychopharmacotherapy based on pharmacists' overall expertise in pharmacotherapy, in real-life health settings, such is not necessarily the case. As a matter of fact, (1) pharmacists' real expertise in pharmacotherapy is mainly seen as useful to patients (as part of therapeutic education), (2) pharmacists' practice methods are usually circumscribed to the framework of quality processes (e.g. comprehensive medication management) which are not particularly useful to clinicians who have a greater need for pharmacotherapeutic skills, (3) the difficulties in terms of collaboration between pharmacists and physicians are well-known. We describe here the implementation of an alternative system of pharmacotherapy counselling inspired by case by cases in which the remote expertise of pharmacists in psychopharmacology guided prescribers towards the implementation of recommendations from the literature. This shared decision-making process integrates both the clinical elements provided by the psychiatrist and the pharmacotherapeutic information provided by the clinical psychopharmacist, to promote evidence-based medicine (algorithmic data in recommendations) and tailor-made solutions (drug-drug and drug-disease interactions) for patients. In our experience, the success of such an initiative is likely to promote the development of clinical psychopharmacology in psychiatric settings. Importantly, within this framework, the pharmacovigilance unit and psychopharmacologist are useful resources to guide the decision-making process of the pharmacist-psychiatrist duo.

Fear and anxiety managing methods during dental treatments: a systematic review of recent data

INTRODUCTION

The management of anxiety and fear of patients experiencing medical treatment is always a major issue. Dentistry is a branch of medicine that is daily in managing these problems, especially in the case of pediatric patients. Odontophobia can be managed in different ways, and the purpose of this study is to eventually review which methods are currently accepted and which are the most effective.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The literature analysis was conducted on a number of articles, suitably skimmed, after a first research, obtained from the most common scientific databases. The number of works included in the review is 28.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

From the RCTs evaluated we could highlight that there are different methods in the literature, equally effective and certainly conditioned by the systemic condition of the patient. Another chapter instead turns out to be that linked to the management of the syndromic patient.

CONCLUSIONS

It is clear that there are different methods and equally different ways to manage our patients in the event of non-cooperation in the case of dental care. In addition to proper management by the clinician, in the literature methods linked to audiovisual distractions, hypnosis or pharmacological methods that produce conscious sedation are effectively reported.

Association Between Sleep Medications and Falls and Fall-related Worries in Community-Dwelling Older Adults in the United States

Background Falls are the leading cause of unintentional fatal and nonfatal injuries in seniors. Sleep medications are associated with adverse events risk in older adults. The objective of this study is to quantify the relationship between different levels of sleep medication use with falls and fall-related worries in United States adults aged 65 years and older using a nationally representative sample. Methods Using the 2011 National Health and Aging Trends Study, survey-weighted multiple logistic regression was used to determine the association between participants who reported sleep medication use and the outcomes: falls in the last month, falls in the last year, multiple falls in the last year, fall-related worries, and limitation of activities due to fall-related worries. Results In adjusted analyses, older adults who used sleep medications every night compared to non-users of sleep medications were at increased odds of falls in the last year with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.51 (95% confidence limit [CL] 1.27, 1.78) and of multiple falls with an OR = 1.67 (95% CL 1.35, 2.06). For those who used sleep medications less than every night compared to non-users, there were no statistically significant increased odds of fall outcomes. Older adults who used sleep medication most nights (5–6 nights per week) and every night compared to non-users had increased odds of having fall-related worries with an OR = 1.61 (95% CL 1.06, 2.45) and an OR = 1.32 (95% CL 1.11, 1.58), respectively. Conclusion Older adults who use sleep medication every night are at greater odds of experiencing falls and having fall-related worries. Increased involvement by pharmacists in the community setting and pharmacist-led comprehensive medication reviews are efforts that may reduce sleep medication use and result in fewer falls in older adults.