Current Clinical Practice for the Use of Hypnotics to Manage Primary Insomnia in Adults in a Tertiary Hospital in Saudi Arabia: An Audit Study

Irrational Use of Medications among Adults with Insomnia: An Observational Study at a Sleep Clinic in Mexico

BACKGROUND

To determine the patterns of irrational use of medications among a sample of adult patients with insomnia.

METHODS

We included 89 adult patients diagnosed with chronic insomnia who had consumed medications for this disorder during the 12 months prior to admission to a specialized Sleep Disorders Clinic (SDC) in Mexico City. With a 13-item survey, information was gathered on patterns of medication use and irrational use, considering therapeutic indications, dose, route of administration, and duration of treatment.

RESULTS

The participants had taken hypnotics (65%), antidepressants (21%), anticonvulsants (8%), and antipsychotics (6%), and 92% had irrational use of their medication. Irrational use was greatest with benzodiazepines and antipsychotics. There were two main types of irrational use: (1) 47% of participants had consumed a drug unsuitable for their condition, although it was almost always prescribed by a doctor, and (2) 43% had consumed a drug for longer than the maximum time recommended.

CONCLUSION

It is worrisome to find that the irrational use of medications to treat insomnia, especially benzodiazepines and antipsychotics is widespread. Although most participants had acquired their medication by prescription, for many the drug was inappropriate to treat their condition. It should be mandatory that patients with insomnia receive specialized medical attention in primary clinical care.

Understanding the unmet needs in insomnia treatment: a systematic literature review of real-world evidence

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to define and characterize the unmet needs in the pharmacological management of insomnia.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify relevant literature reporting real-world evidence in insomnia, published from January 2009 to April 2020. Pharmacological treatments - both prescription (benzodiazepines, 'Z-drugs' and suvorexant) and off-label (antidepressants, antipsychotics, and antihistamines) - were considered.

RESULTS

Overall, 108 publications describing the humanistic (n = 59) and economic burden (n = 20) of insomnia, off-label treatment patterns (n = 28) and factors influencing treatment adherence or persistence (n = 8) were identified. A high prevalence of comorbid conditions was reported in patients with insomnia resulting in significantly lower health-related QoL compared to those with insomnia or a comorbidity alone. Current treatment options were associated with adverse events, including reduced sleep quality and next-day somnolence. An increased risk of accidents/injuries was also associated with insomnia and its treatment. Furthermore, safety concerns and perceived lack of efficacy for approved treatments have led to frequent off-label prescribing, despite a lack of clinical evidence of risk/benefit ratios. Safety concerns associated with benzodiazepines include risk of dependence, leading to prolonged treatment persistence and exacerbated adverse events, making them unsuitable for use in patients with chronic insomnia. Finally, the substantial economic burden of insomnia was evident, with reduced work productivity demonstrated in patients with insomnia compared to the general population.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights a clear unmet need for insomnia therapies that improve sleep quality without resulting in next-day impairment and/or dependence.

Fear and anxiety managing methods during dental treatments: a systematic review of recent data

INTRODUCTION

The management of anxiety and fear of patients experiencing medical treatment is always a major issue. Dentistry is a branch of medicine that is daily in managing these problems, especially in the case of pediatric patients. Odontophobia can be managed in different ways, and the purpose of this study is to eventually review which methods are currently accepted and which are the most effective.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The literature analysis was conducted on a number of articles, suitably skimmed, after a first research, obtained from the most common scientific databases. The number of works included in the review is 28.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

From the RCTs evaluated we could highlight that there are different methods in the literature, equally effective and certainly conditioned by the systemic condition of the patient. Another chapter instead turns out to be that linked to the management of the syndromic patient.

CONCLUSIONS

It is clear that there are different methods and equally different ways to manage our patients in the event of non-cooperation in the case of dental care. In addition to proper management by the clinician, in the literature methods linked to audiovisual distractions, hypnosis or pharmacological methods that produce conscious sedation are effectively reported.

Perceptions of physicians in Saudi Arabia on the use of international clinical guidelines for managing primary insomnia

INTRODUCTION

While there are no national clinical guidelines for managing primary insomnia in Saudi Arabia, there are also no published studies of physicians' perceptions of and attitudes towards using international guidelines. The objective of this study was to explore the knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes of physicians practising in Saudi Arabia about using international guidelines for managing insomnia.

METHODS

A qualitative study using in-depth, face-to-face, and semi-structured interviews with 15 physicians held in July 2017 at a tertiary care hospital in Jazan, the distal south-western province in Saudi Arabia. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded using the qualitative software NVivo11 and analysed thematically. Data saturation was assumed as no new understandings of the broad thematic issues were produced by the last three interviews.

RESULTS

Themes identified were: Knowledge, Resistance, Barriers and Facilitators. Participants acknowledged their lack of awareness of available guidelines and their lack of training and education about Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I). They highlighted a lack of education for patients about insomnia and its treatment. Beliefs about dependence on hypnotics and the inappropriateness of international guidelines for Saudi Arabia inclined many to resist using them. Inability to document diagnosis and consultations due to limited time and lack of suitable electronic systems, lack of suitably trained practitioners for referral for CBT-I, and lack of accountability for practice were identified as key barriers to following international guidelines. Development of national guidelines was the most important facilitator suggested by participants.

CONCLUSIONS

The health authorities in the government of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) should improve general public awareness about sleep disorders and provide focused training for specialists and technologists. Above all, KSA needs its own nationwide guidelines for treating sleep-disorders based on evidence-based clinical trials, consistent with its history, culture, socioeconomic conditions and traditions.