Barriers and Challenges in Performing Pharmacokinetic Studies to Inform Dosing in the Neonatal Population

Acyclovir Dosing Practices Across a Multicenter Cohort of Neonatal Intensive Care Units

BACKGROUND

Acyclovir is the first-line therapy for neonatal herpes simplex virus infections. Therapy can mitigate morbidity and mortality but carries a risk for toxicity. We aimed to compare acyclovir dosing in neonatal intensive care units to published recommendations based on population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) analysis.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter cohort study of infants in neonatal intensive care units managed by the Pediatrix Medical Group from 1997 to 2020. We included all infants who received acyclovir with complete dosing information. Our primary outcome was the proportion of courses with dosing within 80%-120% of the PopPK recommended daily dose and at the recommended dosing frequency. We compared dosing before and after the publication of the 2014 PopPK recommendations using linear probability modeling.

RESULTS

We identified 6862 infants with complete dosing information across 308 centers. Dosing met PopPK recommendations for 41% of treatment courses for infants <30 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA), 71% for infants 30 to <36 weeks PMA and <1% for infants ≥ 36 weeks PMA. Comparison of dosing from 1997 to 2013 with that from 2015 to 2020 showed a significant increase in dosing meeting PopPK recommendations for infants <30 weeks PMA (P = 0.008) and infants 30 to <36 weeks PMA (P = 0.02) but not infants ≥ 36 weeks PMA (P = 0.29). No significant increase in dosing meeting PopPK recommendations was seen for any PMA group when comparison was limited to more recent years (2008-2013 vs. 2015-2020).

CONCLUSIONS

Dosing meeting PopPK recommendations increased over time for some PMA groups, but dosing different than PopPK recommendations remains common. More research is needed to clarify optimal dosing strategies in these infants.

A point-of-care pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic trial in critically ill children: Study design and feasibility

Background

High-quality, efficient, pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), and safety studies in children are needed. Point-of-care trials in adults have facilitated clinical trial participation for patients and providers, minimized the disruption of clinical workflow, and capitalized on routine data collection. The feasibility and value of point-of-care trials to study PK/PD in children are unknown, but appear promising. The Opportunistic PK/PD Trial in Critically Ill Children with Heart Disease (OPTIC) is a programmatic point-of-care approach to PK/PD trials in critically ill children that seeks to overcome barriers of traditional pediatric PK/PD studies to generate safety, efficacy, PK, and PD data across multiple medications, ages, and disease processes.

Methods

This prospective, open-label, non-randomized point-of-care trial will characterize the PK/PD and safety of multiple drugs given per routine care to critically ill children with heart disease using opportunistic and scavenged biospecimen samples and data collected from the electronic health record. OPTIC has one informed consent form with drug-specific appendices, streamlining study structure and institutional review board approval. OPTIC capitalizes on routine data collection through multiple data sources that automatically capture demographics, medications, laboratory values, vital signs, flowsheets, and other clinical data. This innovative automatic data collection minimizes the burden of data collection and facilitates trial conduct. Data will be validated across sources to ensure accuracy of dataset variables.

Discussion

OPTIC's point-of-care trial design and automated data acquisition via the electronic health record may provide a mechanism for conducting minimal risk, minimal burden, high efficiency trials and support drug development in historically understudied patient populations.

Trial registration

clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT05055830. Registered on September 24, 2021.

Massive presence of off-label medicines in Danish neonatal departments: A nationwide survey using national hospital purchase data

There is currently insufficient knowledge of gestational age dependent medicine disposition in neonates. Accordingly, the use of off-label medication, i.e., use of medicines outside its approved marketing authorization, is high in the neonatal departments. By using data from the Danish National Pharmaceutical Hospital Purchase Database, we identified the most commonly occurring medications and calculated the on/off-label ratios for premature and term neonates. Data was extracted on ATC level 5 and based on defined daily doses as per WHO. Data covered the 4 high-level NICUs and 10 of 13 of the intermediate/standard level Danish neonatal departments. Of the identified medication, 87% and 70% did not have approved marketing authorization for use in premature and full-term neonates, respectively. Furthermore, one-fifth of the top 100 medicines did not have a (Danish) marketing license. Overall, off-label medication was widespread covering virtually all ATC groups and no ATC group had an off-label level lower than 50% (range 50%-100%). Finally, in 21% of medications, additives from 8 different chemical groups with potential deleterious effects for neonates were identified. In conclusion, off-label medication in the Danish neonatal departments is widespread. The pharmaceutical industry is unlikely to solve this problem, and we may for a very long time be occasionally forced to use off-label medication. Practical solution must therefore come from multidisciplinary clinical and academic collaboration. Use of formulation list as guidance for prescriptions and NICU-friendly galenic formulations may mitigate the problem temporarily while waiting for definitive studies.

Randomised controlled trial of fosfomycin in neonatal sepsis: pharmacokinetics and safety in relation to sodium overload

OBJECTIVE

To assess pharmacokinetics and changes to sodium levels in addition to adverse events (AEs) associated with fosfomycin among neonates with clinical sepsis.

DESIGN

A single-centre open-label randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

Kilifi County Hospital, Kenya.

PATIENTS

120 neonates aged ≤28 days admitted being treated with standard-of-care (SOC) antibiotics for sepsis: ampicillin and gentamicin between March 2018 and February 2019.

INTERVENTION

We randomly assigned half the participants to receive additional intravenous then oral fosfomycin at 100 mg/kg two times per day for up to 7 days (SOC-F) and followed up for 28 days.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Serum sodium, AEs and fosfomycin pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS

61 and 59 infants aged 0-23 days were assigned to SOC-F and SOC, respectively. There was no evidence of impact of fosfomycin on serum sodium or gastrointestinal side effects. We observed 35 AEs among 25 SOC-F participants and 50 AEs among 34 SOC participants during 1560 and 1565 infant-days observation, respectively (2.2 vs 3.2 events/100 infant-days; incidence rate difference -0.95 events/100 infant-days (95% CI -2.1 to 0.20)). Four SOC-F and 3 SOC participants died. From 238 pharmacokinetic samples, modelling suggests an intravenous dose of 150 mg/kg two times per day is required for pharmacodynamic target attainment in most children, reduced to 100 mg/kg two times per day in neonates aged <7 days or weighing <1500 g.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Fosfomycin offers potential as an affordable regimen with a simple dosing schedule for neonatal sepsis. Further research on its safety is needed in larger cohorts of hospitalised neonates, including very preterm neonates or those critically ill. Resistance suppression would only be achieved for the most sensitive of organisms so fosfomycin is recommended to be used in combination with another antimicrobial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03453177.

Use of Antibiotics in Preterm Newborns

Due to complex maturational and physiological changes that characterize neonates and affect their response to pharmacological treatments, neonatal pharmacology is different from children and adults and deserves particular attention. Although preterms are usually considered part of the neonatal population, they have physiological and pharmacological hallmarks different from full-terms and, therefore, need specific considerations. Antibiotics are widely used among preterms. In fact, during their stay in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), invasive procedures, including central catheters for parental nutrition and ventilators for respiratory support, are often sources of microbes and require antimicrobial treatments. Unfortunately, the majority of drugs administered to neonates are off-label due to the lack of clinical studies conducted on this special population. In fact, physiological and ethical concerns represent a huge limit in performing pharmacokinetic (PK) studies on these subjects, since they limit the number and volume of blood sampling. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a useful tool that allows dose adjustments aiming to fit plasma concentrations within the therapeutic range and to reach specific drug target attainment. In this review of the last ten years’ literature, we performed Pubmed research aiming to summarize the PK aspects for the most used antibiotics in preterms.

The Blind Spot of Pharmacology: A Scoping Review of Drug Metabolism in Prematurely Born Children

The limit for possible survival after extremely preterm birth has steadily improved and consequently, more premature neonates with increasingly lower gestational age at birth now require care. This specialized care often include intensive pharmacological treatment, yet there is currently insufficient knowledge of gestational age dependent differences in drug metabolism. This potentially puts the preterm neonates at risk of receiving sub-optimal drug doses with a subsequent increased risk of adverse or insufficient drug effects, and often pediatricians are forced to prescribe medication as off-label or even off-science. In this review, we present some of the particularities of drug disposition and metabolism in preterm neonates. We highlight the challenges in pharmacometrics studies on hepatic drug metabolism in preterm and particularly extremely (less than 28 weeks of gestation) preterm neonates by conducting a scoping review of published literature. We find that >40% of included studies failed to report a clear distinction between term and preterm children in the presentation of results making direct interpretation for preterm neonates difficult. We present summarized findings of pharmacokinetic studies done on the major CYP sub-systems, but formal meta analyses were not possible due the overall heterogeneous approaches to measuring the phase I and II pathways metabolism in preterm neonates, often with use of opportunistic sampling. We find this to be a testament to the practical and ethical challenges in measuring pharmacokinetic activity in preterm neonates. The future calls for optimized designs in pharmacometrics studies, including PK/PD modeling-methods and other sample reducing techniques. Future studies should also preferably be a collaboration between neonatologists and clinical pharmacologists.

External evaluation of the predictive performance of seven population pharmacokinetic models for phenobarbital in neonates

AIM

Several studies have reported population pharmacokinetic models for phenobarbital (PB), but the predictive performance of these models has not been well documented. This study aims to do external evaluation of the predictive performance in published pharmacokinetic models.

METHODS

Therapeutic drug monitoring data collected in neonates and young infants treated with PB for seizure control was used for external evaluation. A literature review was conducted through PubMed to identify population pharmacokinetic models. Prediction- and simulation-based diagnostics, and Bayesian forecasting were performed for external evaluation. The incorporation of allometric scaling for body size and maturation factors into the published models was also tested for prediction improvement.

RESULTS

A total of 79 serum concentrations from 28 subjects were included in the external dataset. Seven population pharmacokinetic studies of PB were identified as relevant in the literature search and included for our evaluation. The model by Voller et al showed the best performance concerning prediction-based evaluation. In simulation-based analyses, the normalized prediction distribution error of two models (those of Shellhaas et al and Marsot et al) obeyed a normal distribution. Bayesian forecasting with more than one observation improved predictive capability. Incorporation of both allometric size scaling and maturation function generally enhanced the predictive performance, with improvement as observed in the model of Vucicevic et al. CONCLUSIONS: The predictive performance of published pharmacokinetic models of PB was diverse. Bayesian forecasting and incorporation of both size and maturation factors could improve the predictability of the models for neonates.