Probing Small Distances in Live Cell Imaging

A Reverse Transfection System with Cationized Gelatin Nanospheres Incorporating Molecular Beacon as a Tool to Visualize Cell Function

The objective of this research is to design a reverse transfection system with cationized gelatin nanospheres (cGNS) incorporating a molecular beacon (MB) to visualize a cell function. The cGNS were prepared by the conventional coacervation method. The MB as an imaging probe was incorporated into the cGNS to prepare imaging complexes (cGNSMB). The conventional transfection of 2D culture was performed by incubating MC3T3 cells in the medium containing cGNSMB. The reverse transfection was done by incubating cells on the substrate which had been precoated with both gelatin and cGNSMB. Significantly higher internalization efficiency and fluorescence intensity of cGNSMB were observed in the reverse transfection system than in the conventional one. To apply this system for visualization of 3D cell aggregate, gelatin microspheres (GMS) were prepared, while cGNSMB were bound on the GMS to prepare the GMS-cGNSMB of a cell scaffold. Then the cells were incubated with GMS-cGNSMB to form 3D cell aggregates. On the other hand, as a control, the conventional transfection of 3D culture was performed by incubating the cell aggregates formed with the medium containing cGNSMB. Homogeneous fluorescence of MB from the inside to the outside of aggregates was observed for the reverse transfection group. However, for the conventional transfection, the fluorescence was observed only around the surface of cell aggregates. It is concluded that the reverse transfection system with cGNS incorporating MB is promising to visualize the cell function of a higher transfection efficiency for the 2D culture and in a homogeneous manner for the 3D culture.

Blood Cell Analysis: From Traditional Methods to Super-Resolution Microscopy

Blood cell analysis is essential for the diagnosis and identification of hematological malignancies. The use of digital microscopy systems has been extended in clinical laboratories. Super-resolution microscopy (SRM) has attracted wide attention in the medical field due to its nanoscale spatial resolution and high sensitivity. It is considered to be a potential method of blood cell analysis that may have more advantages than traditional approaches such as conventional optical microscopy and hematology analyzers in certain examination projects. In this review, we firstly summarize several common blood cell analysis technologies in the clinic, and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of these technologies. Then, we focus on the basic principles and characteristics of three representative SRM techniques, as well as the latest advances in these techniques for blood cell analysis. Finally, we discuss the developmental trend and possible research directions of SRM, and provide some discussions on further development of technologies for blood cell analysis.

Fluorescence Microscopy-Based Quantitation of GLUT4 Translocation

Postprandial insulin-stimulated glucose uptake into target tissue is crucial for the maintenance of normal blood glucose homeostasis. This step is rate-limited by the number of facilitative glucose transporters type 4 (GLUT4) present in the plasma membrane. Since insulin resistance and impaired GLUT4 translocation are associated with the development of metabolic disorders such as type 2 diabetes, this transporter has become an important target of antidiabetic drug research. The application of screening approaches that are based on the analysis of GLUT4 translocation to the plasma membrane to identify substances with insulinomimetic properties has gained global research interest in recent years. Here, we review methods that have been implemented to quantitate the translocation of GLUT4 to the plasma membrane. These methods can be broadly divided into two sections: microscopy-based technologies (e.g., immunoelectron, confocal or total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy) and biochemical and spectrometric approaches (e.g., membrane fractionation, photoaffinity labeling or flow cytometry). In this review, we discuss the most relevant approaches applied to GLUT4 thus far, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of these approaches, and we provide a critical discussion and outlook into new methodological opportunities.