Romero IO, Fang Y, Li C. Correlation between X-ray tube current exposure time and X-ray photon number in GATE.
JOURNAL OF X-RAY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 2022;
30:667-675. [PMID:
35466921 PMCID:
PMC10754355 DOI:
10.3233/xst-221126]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
X-ray image quality relies heavily on the emitted X-ray photon number which depends on X-ray tube current and exposure time. To accurately estimate the absorbed dose in an imaging protocol, it is better to simulate the X-ray imaging with a Monte Carlo platform such as GATE (Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission). Although input of GATE is the X-ray photon number of the simulated X-ray tube, it lacks a good way to setup the photon number for a desired X-ray tube current setting.
OBJECTIVE
To provide a method to correlate the experimental X-ray tube current exposure time and the X-ray photon number in GATE.
METHODS
The accumulated radiation dose of a micro-computed tomography (CT) X-ray tube was recorded at different current exposure times with a general-purpose ion chamber. GATE was used to model the experimental microCT imaging system and calculate the total absorbed dose (cGy) in the sensitive volume of the ion chamber with different X-ray photon numbers. Linear regression models are used to establish a correlation between the estimated X-ray photon number and the X-ray tube settings. At first, one model establishes the relationship between the experimentally measured dose and the X-ray tube setting. Then, another model establishes a relationship between the simulated dose and the X-ray number in GATE. At last, by correlating these two models, a regression model to estimate the X-ray output number from an experimental X-ray tube setting (mAs) is obtained.
RESULTS
For a typical micro-CT scan, the X-ray tube is operated at 50 kVp and 0.5 mA for a 500 ms exposure time per projection (0.25 mAs). For these X-ray imaging parameters, the X-ray number per projection is estimated to be 3.613×106 with 1.0 mm Al filter.
CONCLUSION
The findings of this work provide an approach to correlate the experimental X-ray tube current exposure time to the X-ray photon number in the GATE simulation of the X-ray tube to more accurately determine radiation dose for an imaging protocol.
Collapse