Modelling and Simulation of MuCell®: The Effect of Key Processing Parameters on Cell Size and Weight Reduction

High-Quality Foaming and Weight Reduction in Microcellular-Injection-Molded Polycarbonate Using Supercritical Fluid Carbon Dioxide under Gas Counter Pressure

Microcellular injection molding (MuCell®) using supercritical fluid (SCF) as a foaming agent to achieve weight reduction has become popular in carbon emission reduction. In the typical MuCell® process, SCF N2 is commonly used. Although SCF CO2 exhibits high solubility and can achieve a high weight reduction, controlling the foaming is not easy, and its foaming cells are usually larger and less uniform, which limits its industrial application. Our previous studies have shown that gas counter pressure (GCP) can improve the foaming quality effectively. Here, we investigated whether or not the CO2 SCF foaming quality could be improved, and weight reduction was achieved for polycarbonate (PC) material. This is quite important for the electronics industry, in which most of the housing for devices is made of PC materials. MuCell® was subjected to molding experiments using the parameters of the SCF dosage, melt temperature, mold temperature, and injection speed. The results revealed that using CO2 gas for the PC material can reduce the size of microcellular cells to 40 µm and increase the cell densities to 3.97 × 106 cells/cm3. Using GCP significantly improved the microcellular injection-molded parts by reducing the cell size to 20.9 µm (a 45.41% improvement) and increasing the cell density to 8.04 × 106 cells/cm3 (a 102.48% improvement). However, implementing GCP may slightly decrease the target weight reduction. This study reveals that microcellular injection molding of PC parts using SCF CO2 can achieve high-quality foaming and reduce the weight by about 30%.

Analysis and Validation of Varied Simulation Parameters in the Context of Thermoplastic Foams and Special Injection Molding Processes

The simulation solutions of different plastic injection molding processes are as multifaceted as the field of injection molding itself. In this study, the simulation of a special injection molding process, which generates partially foamed integral components, was parameterized and performed. This partial and physical foaming is realized by a defined volume expansion of the mold cavity. Using the injection molding simulation software Moldex 3D, this so-called Pull and Foam process was digitally reconstructed and simulated. Since the Pull and Foam process is a special injection molding technique for producing foamed components, the validity of the simulation results was analyzed and evaluated. With the use of Moldex 3D, varied settings such as different bubble growth models and mesh topologies were set, parameterized, and then analyzed, to provide differentiated numerical calculation solutions. Actual manufactured components represent the experimental part of this study and are produced for reference. Different evaluation methods were used to quantify morphological quantities such as porosities, local densities, and cell distributions. These methods are based on two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging techniques such as optical microscopy and X-ray microtomography (µ-CT). Thus, this structural characterization of the manufactured samples serves as the validation basis for the calculated results of the simulations. According to the illustrated results, the adequate selection of bubble growth models and especially mesh topologies must be considered for valid simulation of specific core-back techniques, such as the Pull and Foam injection molding process.

Experimental and Finite Element Simulation of Polyolefin Elastomer Foams Using Real 3D Structures: Effect of Foaming Agent Content

In this study, polyolefin elastomer (POE) foams were prepared without any curing agent using a single-step foaming technique. The effect of azodicarbonamide (ADC) content as a chemical foaming agent on the foams’ morphology and mechanical properties was studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), mechanical properties (tension and compression) and hardness. The results showed that increasing the ADC content from 2 to 3, 4 and 5 phr (parts per hundred rubber) decreased the foam density from 0.75 to 0.71, 0.65 and 0.61 g/cm3, respectively. The morphological analysis revealed that increasing the ADC content from 2 to 4 phr produced smaller cell sizes from 153 to 109 µm (29% lower), but a higher cell density from 103 to 591 cells/mm3 (470% higher). However, using 5 phr of ADC led to a larger cell size (148 µm) and lower cell density (483 cells/mm3) due to cell coalescence. The tensile modulus, strength at break, elongation and hardness properties continuously decreased by 28%, 21%, 16% and 14%, respectively, with increasing ADC content (2 to 5 phr). On the other hand, the compressive properties, including elastic modulus and compressive strength, increased by 20% and 64%, respectively, with increasing ADC content (2 to 5 phr). The tensile and compression tests revealed that the former is more dependent on foam density (foaming ratio), while the latter is mainly controlled by the cellular structure (cell size, cell density and internal gas pressure). In addition, 2D SEM images were used to simulate the foams’ real 3D structure, which was used in finite element methods (FEM) to simulate the stress–strain behavior of the samples at two levels: micro-scale and macro-scale. Finally, the FEM results were compared to the experimental data. Based on the information obtained, a good agreement between the macro-scale stress–strain behavior generated by the FEM simulations and experimental data was obtained. While the FEM results showed that the sample with 3 phr of ADC had the lowest micro-scale stress, the sample with 5 phr had the highest micro-scale stress due to smaller and larger cell sizes, respectively.