Experimental data and modeling of sulfadiazine adsorption onto raw and modified clays from Tunisia

In recent years, the increasing detection of emerging pollutants (particularly antibiotics, such as sulfonamides) in agricultural soils and water bodies has raised growing concern about related environmental and health problems. In the current research, sulfadiazine (SDZ) adsorption was studied for three raw and chemically modified clays. The experiments were carried out for increasing doses of the antibiotic (0, 1, 5, 10, 20, and 40 μmol L-1) at ambient temperature and natural pH with a contact time of 24 h. The eventual fitting to Freundlich, Langmuir and Linear adsorption models, as well as residual concentrations of antibiotics after adsorption, was assessed. The results obtained showed that one of the clays (HJ1) adsorbed more SDZ (reaching 99.9 % when 40 μmol L-1 of SDZ were added) than the other clay materials, followed by the acid-activated AM clay (which reached 99.4 % for the same SDZ concentration added). The adsorption of SDZ followed a linear adsorption isotherm, suggesting that hydrophobic interactions, rather than cation exchange, played a significant role in SDZ retention. Concerning the adsorption data, the best adjustment corresponded to the Freundlich model. The highest Freundlich KF scores were obtained for the AM acid-treated and raw HJ1 clays (606.051 and 312.969 Ln μmol1-n kg-1, respectively). The Freundlich n parameter ranged between 0.047 and 1.506. Regarding desorption, the highest value corresponded to the AM clay, being generally <10 % for raw clays, <8 % for base-activated clays, and <6 % for acid-activated clays. Chemical modifications contributed to improve the adsorption capacity of the AM clay, especially when the highest concentrations of the antibiotic were added. The results of this research can be considered relevant as regard environmental and public health assessment since they estimate the feasibility of three Tunisian clays in SDZ removal from aqueous solutions.

Tetracycline (TC) removal from wastewater with activated carbon (AC) obtained from waste grape marc: activated carbon characterization and adsorption mechanism

In this study, activated carbons were obtained from grape marc for tetracycline removal from wastewater. Activated carbons were obtained by subjecting them to pyrolysis at 300, 500, and 700 °C, respectively, and the effect of pyrolysis temperature on activated carbons was investigated. The physicochemical and surface properties of the activated carbons were evaluated by SEM, FTIR, XRD, elemental analysis, N2 adsorption/desorption isothermal, thermal gravimetric (TG) and derivative thermogravimetric (DTG), and BET surface area analysis. When the BET surface areas were examined, it was found that 4.25 m2/g for activated carbon was produced at 300 °C, 44.23 m2/g for activated carbon obtained at 500 °C and 44.23 m2/g at 700 °C, which showed that the BET surface areas increased with increasing pyrolysis temperatures. The pore volumes of the synthesized activated carbons were 0.0037 cm3/g, 0.023 cm3/g, and 0.305 cm3/g for pyrolysis temperatures of 300, 500, and 700 °C, respectively, while the average pore size was found to be 8.02 nm, 9.45 nm, and 10.29 nm, respectively. A better adsorption capacity was observed due to the decrease in oxygen-rich functional groups with increasing pyrolysis temperature. It was observed that the activated carbon obtained from grape skins can easily treat hazardous wastewater containing tetracycline due to its high carbon content and surface functional groups. It was also shown that the activated carbon synthesized in this study has a higher pore volume despite its low surface area compared to the studies in the literature. Thanks to the high pore volume and surface active groups, a successful tetracycline removal was achieved.

Competitive adsorption and desorption of three antibiotics in distinct soil aggregate size fractions

Multiple antibiotics that are used in veterinary medicine coexist in soils, but their interaction and the effects on adsorption and desorption in soils have not been extensively studied. In this study, using batch experiments, we evaluated the adsorption and desorption of sulfadiazine (SDZ), tetracycline (TC), and norfloxacin (NFX) using four different soil aggregate size fractions and discovered that: (1) TC had the highest adsorption (76-98 %) and the lowest desorption in each tested system, whereas SDZ showed opposite adsorption and desorption ability, (2) the highest adsorption and the lowest desorption of all three tested antibiotics were observed with soil macroaggregates (250-2000 µm) in all the cases; in contrast, opposite adsorption and desorption ability were observed for soil clay (<53 µm), and (3) adsorption of each antibiotic was in the following order: single system (71-89 %) > binary system (56-84 %) > ternary system (50-78 %); however, desorption were in the reverse order. The Freundlich equation fitting and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis further demonstrated that the adsorption competition between the tested antibiotics depended mainly on the specific surface area of each soil aggregate size fractions and its chemical properties. In conclusion, soil macroaggregates play a key role in the retention of antibiotics in soils, and the coexistence of multiple antibiotics greatly increases leaching risk.

Competitive adsorption and desorption of tetracycline and sulfadiazine in crop soils

In view of the environmental issues caused by antibiotics, this research studies competitive adsorption/desorption for tetracycline (TC) and sulfadiazine (SDZ) in agricultural soils. Competitive adsorption was studied in binary systems (adding equal concentrations of both antibiotics). In addition, it was compared with results from simple systems. In all cases, batch-type adsorption/desorption experiments were carried out. In the binary systems, for the highest antibiotic concentration added, adsorption percentages were always higher for TC (close to 100%) than for SDZ (10-90%). In these systems, TC desorption was lower than 5% for all soils, and generally <10% for SDZ. Comparing TC and SDZ adsorption for the different systems, SDZ was clearly affected by the presence of TC, with SDZ adsorption percentages being was much higher (with differences generally above 65%) in the binary than in the simple systems. On the contrary, comparing the results of TC adsorption in simple and binary systems, TC was not affected by the presence of SDZ, obtaining similar adsorption percentages in both systems. K_d and K_F values (in the Linear and Freundlich models), were higher in the simple systems in the case of TC, which could be due to competition with SDZ, while for SDZ K_d and K_F were higher in the binary systems, with a synergistic effect of TC favoring SDZ adsorption. Regarding desorption, it reached 100% for SDZ in some soils in simple systems, dropping to 10% in the presence of TC. TC desorption was <4%, not affected by SDZ. The results indicate that environmental risks would be higher for SDZ, showing differences when both antibiotics are present. This can be considered relevant as regards public health and environmental preservation, in view of direct toxicities and the promotion of resistance to antibiotics associated with the presence of these contaminants in the environment.

Gas, Water and Solid Waste Treatment Technology

The increasing trends in gas pollution, water pollution, and solid waste pollution have an adverse impact on human health and ecological habitats [...]

SARS-CoV-2 and other main pathogenic microorganisms in the environment: Situation in Galicia and Spain

In the context of the current COVID-19 pandemic, and mostly taking a broad perspective, it is clearly relevant to study environmental factors that could affect eventual future outbreaks due to coronaviruses and/or other pathogenic microorganisms. In view of that, the authors of this manuscript review the situation of SARS-CoV-2 and other main pathogenic microorganisms in the environment, focusing on Galicia and Spain. Overall, in addition to showing local data, it is put in evidence that, summed to all efforts being carried out to treat/control this and any other eventual future epidemic diseases, both at local and global levels, a deep attention should be paid to ecological/environmental aspects that have effects on the planet, its ecosystems and their relations/associations with the probability of spreading of eventual future pandemics.