Effect of X-Ray Tube Configuration on Measurement of Key Soil Fertility Attributes with XRF

Evaluation of Mid-Infrared and X-ray Fluorescence Data Fusion Approaches for Prediction of Soil Properties at the Field Scale

Previous studies investigating multi-sensor fusion for the collection of soil information have shown variable improvements, and the underlying prediction mechanisms are not sufficiently understood for spectrally-active and -inactive properties. Our objective was to study prediction mechanisms and benefits of model fusion by measuring mid-infrared (MIR) and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectra, texture, total and labile organic carbon (OC) and nitrogen (N) content, pH, and cation exchange capacity (CEC) for n = 117 soils from an arable field in Germany. Partial least squares regression models underwent a three-fold training/testing procedure using MIR spectra or elemental concentrations derived from XRF spectra. Additionally, two sequential hybrid and two high-level fusion approaches were tested. For the studied field, MIR was superior for organic properties (ratio of prediction to interquartile distance of validation (RPIQV) for total OC = 7.7 and N = 5.0)), while XRF was superior for inorganic properties (RPIQV for clay = 3.4, silt = 3.0, and sand = 1.8). Even the optimal fusion approach brought little to no accuracy improvement for these properties. The high XRF accuracy for clay and silt is explained by the large number of elements with variable importance in the projection scores >1 (Fe ≈ Ni > Si ≈ Al ≈ Mg > Mn ≈ K ≈ Pb (clay only) ≈ Cr) with strong spearman correlations (±0.57 < rs < ±0.90) with clay and silt. For spectrally-inactive properties relying on indirect prediction mechanisms, the relative improvements from the optimal fusion approach compared to the best single spectrometer were marginal for pH (3.2% increase in RPIQV versus MIR alone) but more pronounced for labile OC (9.3% versus MIR) and CEC (12% versus XRF). Dominance of a suboptimal spectrometer in a fusion approach worsened performance compared to the best single spectrometer. Granger-Ramanathan averaging, which weights predictions according to accuracy in training, is therefore recommended as a robust approach to capturing the potential benefits of multiple sensors.

Geochemical fingerprinting and magnetic susceptibility to unravel the heterogeneous composition of urban soils

The typically high heterogeneity of urban soil properties challenges their characterization and interpretation. The objective of this study was to investigate if proximally sensed volume-specific magnetic susceptibility and/or geochemical soil properties can uncover differences in anthropogenic, lithogenic and pedological contributions in, and between, urban soils. We also tested if volume-specific magnetic susceptibility can predict heavy metal enrichment. Data on 29 soil properties of 103 soil horizons from 16 soils from Ghent, Belgium, were analyzed by factor analysis. A correlation analysis, and in-depth analysis of five contrasting urban soils supplemented insights gained from the factor analysis. The factor analysis extracted four factors: 29.2 % of the soil property variability was attributed to fossil fuel combustion and industrial processes, with high (>0.80) loadings for S, organic carbon, magnetic susceptibility, and Zn. Furthermore, 26.0 % of the variability was linked to parent material differences, with high loadings (>0.80) for K, Rb and Ti. In absence of geogenic carbonates, increased soil alkalinity due to anthropogenic input of CaCO₃ explained 17.0 % of the variability. Lastly, 4.7 % of the variability resulted from variable Zr contents by local geology. Elemental analysis by XRF, possibly combined with magnetic susceptibility measurements, helped to explain lateral or vertical differences related to (1) the nature of anthropogenic influence, for instance burning (e.g., by the S and Zn content) or the incorporation of building rubble (e.g., by the Ca content); (2) the particle size distribution (e.g., by the K, Rb or Ti content); (3) lithology (e.g., by the Zr content); or (4) pedology, such as organic matter build-up (e.g., by the S content) or leaching of alkalis (e.g., by the Ca content). Even though artifacts and soil translocation were common in the studied soils, volume-specific soil magnetic susceptibility measured on fine earth predicted the total heavy metal pollution loading index well (Pearson correlation = 0.85).

Spectra Fusion of Mid-Infrared (MIR) and X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Spectroscopy for Estimation of Selected Soil Fertility Attributes

Previous works indicate that data fusion, compared to single data modelling can improve the assessment of soil attributes using spectroscopy. In this work, two different kinds of proximal soil sensing techniques i.e., mid-infrared (MIR) and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectroscopy were evaluated, for assessment of seven fertility attributes. These soil attributes include pH, organic carbon (OC), phosphorous (P), potassium (K), magnesium (Mg), calcium (Ca) and moisture contents (MC). Three kinds of spectra fusion (SF) (spectra concatenation) approaches of MIR and XRF spectra were compared, namely, spectra fusion-Partial least square (SF-PLS), spectra fusion-Sequential Orthogonalized Partial least square (SF-SOPLS) and spectra fusion-Variable Importance Projection-Sequential Orthogonalized Partial least square (SF-VIP-SOPLS). Furthermore, the performance of SF models was compared with the developed single sensor model (based on individual spectra of MIR and XRF). Compared with the results obtained from single sensor model, SF models showed improvement in the prediction performance for all studied attributes, except for OC, Mg, and K prediction. More specifically, the highest improvement was observed with SF-SOPLS model for pH [R2p = 0.90, root mean square error prediction (RMSEP) = 0.15, residual prediction deviation (RPD) = 3.30, and ratio of performance inter-quantile (RPIQ) = 3.59], successively followed by P (R2p = 0.91, RMSEP = 4.45 mg/100 g, RPD = 3.53, and RPIQ = 4.90), Ca (R2p = 0.92, RMSEP = 177.11 mg/100 g, RPD = 3.66, and RPIQ = 3.22) and MC (R2p = 0.80, RMSEP = 1.91%, RPD = 2.31, RPIQ = 2.62). Overall the study concluded that SF approach with SOPLS attained better performance over the traditional model developed with the single sensor spectra, hence, SF is recommended as the best SF method for improving the prediction accuracy of studied soil attributes. Moreover, the multi-sensor spectra fusion approach is not limited for only MIR and XRF data but in general can be extended for complementary information fusion in order to improve the model performance in precision agriculture (PA) applications.

Data Fusion of XRF and Vis-NIR Using Outer Product Analysis, Granger–Ramanathan, and Least Squares for Prediction of Key Soil Attributes

Visible-near-infrared (vis-NIR) and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) are key technologies becoming pervasive in proximal soil sensing (PSS), whose fusion holds promising potential to improve the estimation accuracy of soil attributes. In this paper, we examine different data fusion methods for the prediction of key soil fertility attributes including pH, organic carbon (OC), magnesium (Mg), and calcium (Ca). To this end, the vis-NIR and XRF spectra of 267 soil samples were collected from nine fields in Belgium, from which the soil samples of six fields were used for calibration of the single-sensor and data fusion models while the validation was performed on the remaining three fields. The first fusion method was the outer product analysis (OPA), for which the outer product (OP) of the two spectra is computed, flattened, and then subjected to partial least squares (PLS) regression model. Two versions of OPA were evaluated: (i) OPA-FS in which the full spectra were used as input; and (ii) OPA-SS in which selected spectral ranges were used as input. In addition, we examined the potential of least squares (LS) and Granger–Ramanathan (GR) analyses for the fusion of the predictions provided by the single-sensor PLS models. Results demonstrate that the prediction performance of the single-sensor PLS models is improved by GR in addition to the LS fusion method for all soil attributes since it accounts for residuals. Resorting to LS, the largest improvements compared to the single-sensor models were obtained, respectively, for Mg (residual prediction deviation (RPD) = 4.08, coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.94, ratio of performance of inter-quantile (RPIQ) = 1.64, root mean square error (RMSE) = 4.57 mg/100 g), OC (RPD = 1.79, R2 = 0.69, RPIQ = 2.82, RMSE = 0.16%), pH (RPD = 1.61, R2 = 0.61, RPIQ = 3.06, RMSE = 0.29), and Ca (RPD = 3.33, R2 = 0.91, RPIQ = 1, RMSE = 207.48 mg/100 g). OPA-FS and OPA-SS outperformed the individual, GR, and LS models for pH only, while OPA-FS was effective in improving the individual sensor models for Mg as well. The results of this study suggest LS as a robust fusion method in improving the prediction accuracy for all the studied soil attributes.

Estimation and Mapping of Soil Properties Based on Multi-Source Data Fusion

Recent advances in remote and proximal sensing technologies provide a valuable source of information for enriching our geo-datasets, which are necessary for soil management and the precision application of farming input resources [...]

Combined Use of Vis-NIR and XRF Sensors for Tropical Soil Fertility Analysis: Assessing Different Data Fusion Approaches

Visible and near infrared (vis-NIR) diffuse reflectance and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) sensors are promising proximal soil sensing (PSS) tools for predicting soil key fertility attributes. This work aimed at assessing the performance of the individual and combined use of vis-NIR and XRF sensors to predict clay, organic matter (OM), cation exchange capacity (CEC), pH, base saturation (V), and extractable (ex-) nutrients (ex-P, ex-K, ex-Ca, and ex-Mg) in Brazilian tropical soils. Individual models using the data of each sensor alone were calibrated using multiple linear regressions (MLR) for the XRF data, and partial least squares (PLS) regressions for the vis-NIR data. Six data fusion approaches were evaluated and compared against individual models using relative improvement (RI). The data fusion approaches included (i) two spectra fusion approaches, which simply combined the data of both sensors in a merged dataset, followed by support vector machine (SF-SVM) and PLS (SF-PLS) regression analysis; (ii) two model averaging approaches using the Granger and Ramanathan (GR) method; and (iii) two data fusion methods based on least squares (LS) modeling. For the GR and LS approaches, two different combinations of inputs were used for MLR. The GR2 and LS2 used the prediction of individual sensors, whereas the GR3 and LS3 used the individual sensors prediction plus the SF-PLS prediction. The individual vis-NIR models showed the best results for clay and OM prediction (RPD ≥ 2.61), while the individual XRF models exhibited the best predictive models for CEC, V, ex-K, ex-Ca, and ex-Mg (RPD ≥ 2.57). For eight out of nine soil attributes studied (clay, CEC, pH, V, ex-P, ex-K, ex-Ca, and ex-Mg), the combined use of vis-NIR and XRF sensors using at least one of the six data fusion approaches improved the accuracy of the predictions (with RI ranging from 1 to 21%). In general, the LS3 model averaging approach stood out as the data fusion method with the greatest number of attributes with positive RI (six attributes; namely, clay, CEC, pH, ex-P, ex-K, and ex-Mg). Meanwhile, no single approach was capable of exploiting the synergism between sensors for all attributes of interest, suggesting that the selection of the best data fusion approach should be attribute-specific. The results presented in this work evidenced the complementarity of XRF and vis-NIR sensors to predict fertility attributes in tropical soils, and encourage further research to find a generalized method of data fusion of both sensors data.