Remote Sensing of River Discharge: A Review and a Framing for the Discipline

Methodological evaluation of river discharges derived from remote sensing and land surface models

This study assesses river discharges derived using remote sensing and hydrologic modeling approaches throughout the CONUS. The remote sensing methods rely on total water storage anomalies (TWSA) from the GRACE satellite mission and water surface elevations from altimetry satellites (JASON-2/3, Sentinel-3). Surface and subsurface runoff from two Land Surface Models (NOAH, CLSM) are routed using the Hillslope River Routing model to determine discharge. The LSMs are part of NASA's Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS). Differences in key physical processes represented in each model, model forcings, and use of data assimilation provide an intriguing basis for comparison. Evaluation is performed using the Kling Gupta Efficiency and USGS stream gauges. Results highlight the effectiveness of both satellite-derived discharge methods, with altimetry generally performing well over a range of discharges and TWSA capturing mean flows. LSM-derived discharge performance varies based on hydroclimatic conditions and drainage areas, with NOAH generally outperforming CLSM. CLSM-derived discharges may be impacted by the use of data assimilation (GLDAS v2.2). Low correlation and high variability contribute to lower KGE values. GLDAS models tend to perform poorly in snow dominated, semi-arid and water-regulated systems where both the timing and magnitude of the simulated results are early and overestimated.

Remote Sensing-Based Extension of GRDC Discharge Time Series - A Monthly Product with Uncertainty Estimates

The Global Runoff Data Center (GRDC) data set has faced a decline in the number of active gauges since the 1980s, leaving only 14% of gauges active as of 2020. We develop the Remote Sensing-based Extension for the GRDC (RSEG) data set that can ingest legacy gauge discharge and remote sensing observations. We employ a stochastic nonparametric mapping algorithm to extend the monthly discharge time series for inactive GRDC stations, benefiting from satellite imagery- and altimetry-derived river width and water height observations. After a rigorous quality assessment of our estimated discharge, involving statistical validation, tests and visual inspection, results in the extension of discharge records for 3377 out of 6015 GRDC stations. The quality of discharge estimates for the rivers with a large or medium mean discharge is quite satisfactory (average KGE value > 0.5) however for river reaches with a low mean discharge the average KGE value drops to 0.33.The RSEG data set regains monitoring capability for 83% of total river discharge measured by GRDC stations, equivalent to 7895 km3/month.

Remote Sensing of Sediment Discharge in Rivers Using Sentinel-2 Images and Machine-Learning Algorithms

The spatio-temporal dynamism of sediment discharge (Qs) in rivers is influenced by various natural and anthropogenic factors. Unfortunately, most rivers are only monitored at a limited number of stations or not gauged at all. Therefore, this study aims to provide a remote-sensing-based alternative for Qs monitoring. The at-a-station hydraulic geometry (AHG) power–law method was compared to the at-many-stations hydraulic geometry (AMHG) method; in addition, a novel AHG machine-learning (ML) method was introduced to estimate water discharge at three gauging stations in the Tisza (Szeged and Algyő) and Maros (Makó) Rivers in Hungary. The surface reflectance of Sentinel-2 images was correlated to in situ suspended sediment concentration (SSC) by support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), artificial neural network (ANN), and combined algorithms. The best performing water discharge and SSC models were employed to estimate the Qs. Our novel AHG ML method gave the best estimations of water discharge (Szeged: R2 = 0.87; Algyő: R2 = 0.75; Makó: R2 = 0.61). Furthermore, the RF (R2 = 0.9) and combined models (R2 = 0.82) showed the best SSC estimations for the Maros and Tisza Rivers. The highest Qs were detected during floods; however, there is usually a clockwise hysteresis between the SSC and water discharge, especially in the Tisza River.

Water Resources in Africa under Global Change: Monitoring Surface Waters from Space

Abstract

The African continent hosts some of the largest freshwater systems worldwide, characterized by a large distribution and variability of surface waters that play a key role in the water, energy and carbon cycles and are of major importance to the global climate and water resources. Freshwater availability in Africa has now become of major concern under the combined effect of climate change, environmental alterations and anthropogenic pressure. However, the hydrology of the African river basins remains one of the least studied worldwide and a better monitoring and understanding of the hydrological processes across the continent become fundamental. Earth Observation, that offers a cost-effective means for monitoring the terrestrial water cycle, plays a major role in supporting surface hydrology investigations. Remote sensing advances are therefore a game changer to develop comprehensive observing systems to monitor Africa's land water and manage its water resources. Here, we review the achievements of more than three decades of advances using remote sensing to study surface waters in Africa, highlighting the current benefits and difficulties. We show how the availability of a large number of sensors and observations, coupled with models, offers new possibilities to monitor a continent with scarce gauged stations. In the context of upcoming satellite missions dedicated to surface hydrology, such as the Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT), we discuss future opportunities and how the use of remote sensing could benefit scientific and societal applications, such as water resource management, flood risk prevention and environment monitoring under current global change.

Article Highlights

The hydrology of African surface water is of global importance, yet it remains poorly monitored and understoodComprehensive review of remote sensing and modeling advances to monitor Africa's surface water and water resourcesFuture opportunities with upcoming satellite missions and to translate scientific advances into societal applications.

Recent changes to Arctic river discharge

Arctic rivers drain ~15% of the global land surface and significantly influence local communities and economies, freshwater and marine ecosystems, and global climate. However, trusted and public knowledge of pan-Arctic rivers is inadequate, especially for small rivers and across Eurasia, inhibiting understanding of the Arctic response to climate change. Here, we calculate daily streamflow in 486,493 pan-Arctic river reaches from 1984-2018 by assimilating 9.18 million river discharge estimates made from 155,710 satellite images into hydrologic model simulations. We reveal larger and more heterogenous total water export (3-17% greater) and water export acceleration (factor of 1.2-3.3 larger) than previously reported, with substantial differences across basins, ecoregions, stream orders, human regulation, and permafrost regimes. We also find significant changes in the spring freshet and summer stream intermittency. Ultimately, our results represent an updated, publicly available, and more accurate daily understanding of Arctic rivers uniquely enabled by recent advances in hydrologic modeling and remote sensing.

River Flow Monitoring by Sentinel-3 OLCI and MODIS: Comparison and Combination

The monitoring of rivers by satellite is an up-to-date subject in hydrological studies as confirmed by the interest of space agencies to finance specific missions that respond to the quantification of surface water flows. We address the problem by using multi-spectral sensors, in the near-infrared (NIR) band, correlating the reflectance ratio between a dry and a wet pixel extracted from a time series of images, the C/M ratio, with five river flow-related variables: water level, river discharge, flow area, mean flow velocity and surface width. The innovative aspect of this study is the use of the Ocean and Land Colour Instrument (OLCI) on board Sentinel-3 satellites, compared to the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) used in previous studies. Our results show that the C/M ratio from OLCI and MODIS is more correlated with the mean flow velocity than with other variables. To improve the number of observations, OLCI and MODIS products are combined into multi-mission time series. The integration provides good quality data at around daily resolution, appropriate for the analysis of the Po River investigated in this study. Finally, the combination of only MODIS products outperforms the other configurations with a frequency slightly lower (~1.8 days).

Editorial for the Special Issue “Remote Sensing of Flow Velocity, Channel Bathymetry, and River Discharge”

River discharge is a fundamental hydrologic quantity that summarizes how a watershed transforms the input of precipitation into output as channelized streamflow [...]

Timing of Landsat Overpasses Effectively Captures Flow Conditions of Large Rivers

Satellites provide a temporally discontinuous record of hydrological conditions along Earth’s rivers (e.g., river width, height, water quality). The degree to which archived satellite data effectively capture the overall population of river flow frequency is unknown. Here, we use the entire archives of Landsat 5, 7, and 8 to determine when a cloud-free image is available over the United States Geological Survey (USGS) river gauges located on Landsat-observable rivers. We compare the flow frequency distribution derived from the daily gauge record to the flow frequency distribution derived from ideally sampling gauged discharge based on the timing of cloud-free Landsat overpasses. Examining the patterns of flow frequency across multiple gauges, we find that there is not a statistically significant difference between the flow frequency distribution associated with observations contained within the Landsat archive and the flow frequency distribution derived from the daily gauge data (α = 0.05), except for hydrological extremes like maximum and minimum flow. At individual gauges, we find that Landsat observations span a wide range of hydrological conditions (97% of total flow variability observed in 90% of the study gauges) but the degree to which the Landsat sample can represent flow frequency distribution varies from location to location and depends on sample size. The results of this study indicate that the Landsat archive is, on average, representative of the temporal frequencies of hydrological conditions present along Earth’s large rivers with broad utility for hydrological, ecologic and biogeochemical evaluations of river systems.