Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 Canopy Water Content Estimation in Croplands through Radiative Transfer Model Inversion

Tree Water Status Affects Tree Branch Position

Physiological processes cause movements of tree stems and branches that occur in a circadian rhythm and over longer time periods, but there is a lack of quantitative understanding of the cause-and-effect relationships. We investigated the movement of tree branches in a long-term drought experiment and at a circadian time scale using time-series of terrestrial laser scanning measurements coupled with measurements of environmental drivers and tree water status. Our results showed that movement of branches was largely explained by leaf water status measured as leaf water potential in a controlled environment for both measured trees (R2 = 0.86 and R2 = 0.75). Our hypothesis is that changes in leaf and branch water status would cause branch movements was further supported by strong relationship between vapor pressure deficit and overnight branch movement (R2 = [0.57–0.74]). Due to lower atmospheric water demand during the nighttime, tree branches settle down as the amount of water in leaves increases. The results indicate that the quantified movement of tree branches could help us to further monitor and understand the water relations of tree communities.

Reviewing the Potential of Sentinel-2 in Assessing the Drought

This paper systematically reviews the potential of the Sentinel-2 (A and B) in assessing drought. Research findings, including the IPCC reports, highlighted the increasing trend in drought over the decades and the need for a better understanding and assessment of this phenomenon. Continuous monitoring of the Earth’s surface is an efficient method for predicting and identifying the early warnings of drought, which enables us to prepare and plan the mitigation procedures. Considering the spatial, temporal, and spectral characteristics, the freely available Sentinel-2 data products are a promising option in this area of research, compared to Landsat and MODIS. This paper evaluates the recent developments in this field induced by the launch of Sentinel-2, as well as the comparison with other existing data products. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the potential of Sentinel-2 in assessing drought through vegetation characteristics, soil moisture, evapotranspiration, surface water including wetland, and land use and land cover analysis. Furthermore, this review also addresses and compares various data fusion methods and downscaling methods applied to Sentinel-2 for retrieving the major bio-geophysical variables used in the analysis of drought. Additionally, the limitations of Sentinel-2 in its direct applicability to drought studies are also evaluated.

Phenology Effects on Physically Based Estimation of Paddy Rice Canopy Traits from UAV Hyperspectral Imagery

Radiation transform models such as PROSAIL are widely used for crop canopy reflectance simulation and biophysical parameter inversion. The PROSAIL model basically assumes that the canopy is turbid homogenous media with a bare soil background. However, the canopy structure changes when crop growth stages develop, which is more or less a departure from this assumption. In addition, a paddy rice field is inundated most of the time with flooded soil background. In this study, field-scale paddy rice leaf area index (LAI), leaf cholorphyll content (LCC), and canopy chlorophyll content (CCC) were retrieved from unmanned-aerial-vehicle-based hyperspectral images by the PROSAIL radiation transform model using a lookup table (LUT) strategy, with a special focus on the effects of growth-stage development and soil-background signature selection. Results show that involving flooded soil reflectance as background reflectance for PROSAIL could improve estimation accuracy. When using a LUT with the flooded soil reflectance signature (LUTflooded) the coefficients of determination (R2) between observed and estimation variables are 0.70, 0.11, and 0.79 for LAI, LCC, and CCC, respectively, for the entire growing season (from tillering to heading growth stages), and the corresponding mean absolute errors (MAEs) are 21.87%, 16.27%, and 12.52%. For LAI and LCC, high model bias mainly occurred in tillering growth stages. There is an obvious overestimation of LAI and underestimation of LCC for in the tillering growth stage. The estimation accuracy of CCC is relatively consistent from tillering to heading growth stages.