Quantification and Mapping of Satellite Driven Surface Energy Balance Fluxes in Semi-Arid to Arid Inter-Mountain Region

Recent Advances in Remote Sensing of Evapotranspiration

Evapotranspiration (ET) plays an important role in coupling the global energy, water, and biogeochemical cycles and explains ecosystem responses to global environmental change. However, quantifying and mapping the spatiotemporal distribution of ET across a large area is still a challenge, which limits our understanding of how a given ecosystem functions under a changing climate. This also poses a challenge to water managers, farmers, and ranchers who often rely on accurate estimates of ET to make important irrigation and management decisions. Over the last three decades, remote sensing-based ET modeling tools have played a significant role in managing water resources and understanding land-atmosphere interactions. However, several challenges, including limited applicability under all conditions, scarcity of calibration and validation datasets, and spectral and spatiotemporal constraints of available satellite sensors, exist in the current state-of-the-art remote sensing-based ET models and products. The special issue on “Remote Sensing of Evapotranspiration II” was launched to attract studies focusing on recent advances in remote sensing-based ET models to help address some of these challenges and find novel ways of applying and/or integrating remotely sensed ET products with other datasets to answer key questions related to water and environmental sustainability. The 13 articles published in this special issue cover a wide range of topics ranging from field- to global-scale analysis, individual model to multi-model evaluation, single sensor to multi-sensor fusion, and highlight recent advances and applications of remote sensing-based ET modeling tools and products.

Comparison of Satellite Driven Surface Energy Balance Models in Estimating Crop Evapotranspiration in Semi-Arid to Arid Inter-Mountain Region

The regional-scale estimation of crop evapotranspiration (ETc) over a heterogeneous surface is an important tool for the decision-makers in managing and allocating water resources. This is especially critical in the arid to semi-arid regions that require supplemental water due to insufficient precipitation, soil moisture, or groundwater. Over the years, various remote sensing-based surface energy balance (SEB) models have been developed to accurately estimate ETc over a regional scale. However, it is important to carry out the SEB model assessment for a particular geographical setting to ensure the suitability of a model. Thus, in this study, four commonly used and contrasting remote sensing models viz. METRIC (mapping evapotranspiration at high resolution with internalized calibration), SEBAL (surface energy balance algorithm for land), S-SEBI (simplified surface energy balance index), and SEBS (surface energy balance system) were compared and used to quantify and map the spatio-temporal variation of ETc in the semi-arid to arid inter-mountain region of Big Horn Basin, Wyoming (Landsat Path/Row: 37/29). Model estimates from 19 cloud-free Landsat 7 and 8 images were compared with the Bowen ratio energy balance system (BREBS) flux stationed in a center pivot irrigated field during 2017 (sugar beet), 2018 (dry bean), and 2019 (barley) growing seasons. The results indicated that all SEB models are effective in capturing the variation of ETc with R2 ranging in between 0.06 to 0.95 and RMSD between 0.07 to 0.15 mm h−1. Pooled data over three vegetative surfaces for three years under irrigated conditions revealed that METRIC (NSE = 0.9) performed better across all land cover types, followed by SEBS (NSE = 0.76), S-SEBI (NSE = 0.73), and SEBAL (NSE = 0.65). In general, all SEB models substantially overestimated ETc and underestimated sensible heat (H) fluxes under dry conditions when only crop residue was available at the surface. A mid-season density plot and absolute difference maps at image scale between the models showed that models involving METRIC, SEBAL, and S-SEBI are close in their estimates of daily crop evapotranspiration (ET24) with pixel-wise RMSD ranged from 0.54 to 0.76 mm d−1 and an average absolute difference across the study area ranged from 0.47 to 0.56 mm d−1. Likewise, all the SEB models underestimated the seasonal ETc, except SEBS.