Comparison of Aerosol Optical Depth from MODIS Product Collection 6.1 and AERONET in the Western United States

Satellite-based aerosol optical depth estimates over the continental U.S. during the 2020 wildfire season: Roles of smoke and land cover

Wildfires produce smoke that can affect an area >1000 times the burn extent, with far-reaching human health, ecologic, and economic impacts. Accurately estimating aerosol load within smoke plumes is therefore crucial for understanding and mitigating these impacts. We evaluated the effectiveness of the latest Collection 6.1 MODIS Multi-Angle Implementation of Atmospheric Correction (MAIAC) algorithm in estimating aerosol optical depth (AOD) across the U.S. during the historic 2020 wildfire season. We compared satellite-based MAIAC AOD to ground-based AERONET AOD measurements during no-, light-, medium-, and heavy-smoke conditions identified using the Hazard Mapping System Fire and Smoke Product. This smoke product consists of maximum extent smoke polygons digitized by analysts using visible band imagery and classified according to smoke density. We also examined the strength of the correlations between satellite- and ground-based AOD for major land cover types under various smoke density levels. MAIAC performed well in estimating AOD during smoke-affected conditions. Correlations between MAIAC and AERONET AOD were strong for medium- (r = 0.91) and heavy-smoke (r = 0.90) density, and MAIAC estimates of AOD showed little bias relative to ground-based AERONET measurements (normalized mean bias = 3 % for medium, 5 % for heavy smoke). During two high AOD, heavy smoke episodes, MAIAC underestimated ground-based AERONET AOD under mixed aerosol (i.e., smoke and dust; median bias = -0.08) and overestimated AOD under smoke-dominated (median bias = 0.02) aerosol. MAIAC most overestimated ground-based AERONET AOD over barren land (mean NMB = 48 %). Our findings indicate that MODIS MAIAC can provide robust estimates of AOD as smoke density increases in coming years. Increased frequency of mixed aerosol and expansion of developed land could affect the performance of the MAIAC algorithm in the future, however, with implications for evaluating wildfire-associated health and welfare effects and air quality standards.

Mapping of salty aeolian dust-source potential areas: Ensemble model or benchmark models?

Considering the effects of dust on human health, environment, agriculture, and transportation, it is necessary to investigate dust emissions susceptibility. This study aimed to study the capability of different machine learning models in analyzing land susceptibility to dust emissions. At first, the dust-source areas were identified by examining the frequency of occurrence (FOO) of dusty days using the aerosol optical depth (AOD) of the MODIS sensor from 2000 to 2020 and field surveys. Then, the weighted subspace random forest (WSRF) model in comparison with three benchmark models-general linear model (GLM), boosted regression tree (BRT), and support vector machine (SVM)-was employed to predict land susceptibility to dust emissions and also to determine the importance of dust-drivers. The results revealed that the WSRF outperformed benchmark models. In a nutshell, the values of accuracy, Kappa, and probability of detection for all models were more than 97 %, and also the false alarm rate was less than 1 % for all models. Spatial analysis indicated a greater frequency of dust events in the outskirts of Urmia Lake (mainly in the eastern and southern parts). Furthermore, according to the map of land susceptibility to dust emissions produced by the WSRF model, about 4.5 %, 2.8 %, 1.8 %, 0.8 %, and 0.2 % of the salt land, rangeland, agricultural, dry-farming, and barren lands, respectively, associated with high and very high degrees of dust emissions susceptibility. Therefore, this study provided in-depth insights into the applicability of the ensemble model, WSRF, to precisely map dust emissions susceptibility.

Validation and Analysis of MISR and POLDER Aerosol Products over China

Multi-angle polarization measurement is an important technical means of satellite remote sensing applied to aerosol monitoring. By adding angle information and polarization measurements, aerosol optical and microphysical properties can be more comprehensively and accurately retrieved. The accuracy of aerosol retrieval can reflect the advantages and specific accuracy improvement of multi-angle polarization. In this study, the Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR) V23 aerosol products and the Polarization and Directionality of the Earth’s Reflectance (POLDER) GRASP “high-precision” archive were evaluated with the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) observations over China. Validation of aerosol optical depth (AOD), absorbing aerosol optical depth (AAOD), and the Ångström exponent (AE) properties was conducted. Our results show that the AOD inversion accuracy of POLDER-3/GRASP is higher with the correlation coefficient (R) of 0.902, slope of 0.896, root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.264, mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.190, and about 40.71% of retrievals within the expected error (EE, ± 0.05+0.2×AODAERONET) lines. For AAOD, the performance of two products is poor, with better results for POLDER-3/GRASP data. POLDER-3/GRASP AE also has higher R of 0.661 compared with that of MISR AE (0.334). According to the validation results, spatiotemporal distribution, and comparison with other traditional scalar satellite data, the performance of multi-angle polarization observations is better and is suitable for the retrieval of aerosol properties.

Evaluation and Comparison of MODIS C6 and C6.1 Deep Blue Aerosol Products in Arid and Semi-Arid Areas of Northwestern China

The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Deep Blue (DB) algorithm was developed for aerosol retrieval on bright surfaces. Although the global validation accuracy of the DB product is satisfactory, there are still some regions found to have very low accuracy. To this end, DB has updated the surface database in the latest version of the Collection 6.1 (C6.1) algorithm. Some studies have shown that DB aerosol optical depth (AOD) of the old version Collection 6 (C6) has been seriously underestimated in Northwestern China. However, the status of the new version of the C6.1 product in this region is still unknown. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the performance of the MODIS DB product in Northwestern China. The DB AOD with high quality (Quality Flag = 2 or 3) was selected to validate against the 23 sites from the China Aerosol Remote Sensing Network (CARSNET) and Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) during the period 2002–2014. By the overall analysis, the results indicate that both C6 and C6.1 show significant underestimation with a large fraction of more than 54% of collocations falling below the Expected Error (EE = ±(0.05 + 20% AODground)) envelope and with a large negative Mean Bias (MB) of less than −0.14. Furthermore, the new C6.1 products failed to achieve reasonable improvements in the region of Northwestern China. Besides, C6.1 has slightly fewer collocations than C6 due that some pixels with systematic biases have been removed from the new surface reflectance database. From the analysis of the site scale, the scatter plot of C6.1 is similar to that of C6 in most sites. Furthermore, a significant underestimation of DB AOD was observed at most sites, with the most severe underestimation at two sites located in the Taklimakan Desert region. Among 23 sites in Northwestern China, there are only two sites where C6.1 has largely improved the underestimation of C6. Furthermore, it is interesting to note that there are also two sites where the accuracy of the new C6.1 has declined. Moreover, it is surprising that there is one site where a large overestimation was observed in C6 and improved in C6.1. Additionally, we found a constant value of about 0.05 for both C6 and C6.1 at several sites with low aerosol loading, which is an obvious artifact. The significant improvements of C6.1 were observed in the Middle East and Central Asia but not in most sites of Northwestern China. The results of this study will be beneficial to further improvements in the MODIS DB algorithm.

Dust Radiative Effect Characteristics during a Typical Springtime Dust Storm with Persistent Floating Dust in the Tarim Basin, Northwest China

A special topography and ultra-high atmospheric boundary layer conditions in the Tarim Basin (TB) lead to the unique spatial–temporal distribution characteristics of dust aerosols. A typical dust storm with persistent floating dust over the TB from 27 April to 1 May 2015 was used to investigate the characteristics of the dust radiative effect using the Weather Research and Forecasting Model with Chemistry (WRF-Chem). Based on reasonable evaluations involving in situ sounding observations, as well as remotely sensed MODIS observations of meteorology, dust aerosols, and the ultra-high atmospheric boundary layer, the simulation characterized the complete characteristics of the dust direct radiative effect (DDRE) during the dust storm outbreak stage and persistent floating dust stage over the TB. During the daytime, the shortwave (SW) radiative effect heated the atmosphere and cooled the land surface (SUR), whereas the longwave (LW) radiative effect had the opposite effect on the TB. Regarding low-level dust, the LW radiative effect was greater than the SW DDRE in the atmosphere, while for high-level dust the situation was reversed. During the nighttime, the LW DDRE at the top of the atmosphere (TOA), at the SUR, and in the atmosphere was less than that during the daytime, when the DDRE at the SUR was the most significant. In contrast to the daytime, the near-surface dust aerosols exerted an LW warming effect in the atmosphere during the nighttime; however, the dust LW radiative effect had a cooling effect from above a 100 m altitude until the top of the dust layer. In contrast, the DDRE heating rate peaked at the top of the dust layer within the TB. The event-averaged net DDRE was 0.53, −5.90, and 6.43 W m−2 at the TOA, at the SUR, and in the atmosphere over the TB, respectively. The dust SW radiative effect was stronger than the dust L4W radiative effect over the TB at the SUR and in the atmosphere. Moreover, the DDRE at the TOA was weaker than that at the SUR. Overall, the study revealed noteworthy radiative effect features of dust aerosols during typical dust storms with persistent floating dust over the TB.

A Novel Atmospheric Correction Algorithm to Exploit the Diurnal Variability in Hypertemporal Geostationary Observations

This study developed a new atmospheric correction algorithm, GeoNEX-AC, that is independent from the traditional use of spectral band ratios but dedicated to exploiting information from the diurnal variability in the hypertemporal geostationary observations. The algorithm starts by evaluating smooth segments of the diurnal time series of the top-of-atmosphere (TOA) reflectance to identify clear-sky and snow-free observations. It then attempts to retrieve the Ross-Thick–Li-Sparse (RTLS) surface bi-directional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) parameters and the daily mean atmospheric optical depth (AOD) with an atmospheric radiative transfer model (RTM) to optimally simulate the observed diurnal variability in the clear-sky TOA reflectance. Once the initial RTLS parameters are retrieved after the algorithm’s burn-in period, they serve as the prior information to estimate the AOD levels for the following days and update the surface BRDF information with the new clear-sky observations. This process is iterated through the full time span of the observations, skipping only totally cloudy days or when surface snow is detected. We tested the algorithm over various Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) sites and the retrieved results well agree with the ground-based measurements. This study demonstrates that the high-frequency diurnal geostationary observations contain unique information that can help to address the atmospheric correction problem from new directions.