1
|
An IoT-Based Breeding Egg Identification and Coding System for Selection of High-Quality Breeding Geese. Animals (Basel) 2022; 12:ani12121545. [PMID: 35739880 PMCID: PMC9219507 DOI: 10.3390/ani12121545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary In the process of breeding geese, manually recording data causes the problems of missing and confusing characterization data; furthermore, manual intervention can lead to the stress response of breeding geese and affect the laying efficiency of breeding geese. In this study, we tried to combine the Internet of things and computer image technology to improve the accuracy of data recording, so as to achieve an accurate correspondence between breeding goose individual data and egg-laying data. Therefore, we developed and tested a breeding egg identification and coding system to realize the selection of high-quality breeding geese. The test results showed that the system realized a correspondence of 97.8% between breeding goose individual data and egg-laying data. The system realized the information recording of breeding geese under nonmanual intervention, realized the correspondence between individual data and egg-laying data, and improved the health and welfare of breeding geese. Abstract The selection of breeding geese requires the recording of egg production information to correspond to the identity of the breeding geese. However, due to the special physiological characteristics of breeding geese, manual recording in practice can affect the egg-laying performance of breeding geese and can also lead to problems of missing and confusing individual breeding goose data with the number of eggs laid by the geese. For contactless recording of breeding goose identity and egg production information for high-quality breeding, this paper proposes an Internet of things (IoT)-based breeding egg identification and coding method for the selection of high-quality breeding geese. At the sensing level, we deployed a radiofrequency identification (RFID)-based sensor. Each breeding goose wore a foot ring RFID tag on its leg, and the individual information was read by foot ring RFID readers placed at the bottom of the devices. Individual information was uploaded to the cloud server for database management through structured query language (MySQL). The target detection modules were mounted on top of the devices, and the breeding geese and eggs were detected in the delivery rooms by an improved single-shot multi-box detector (SSD) target detection algorithm. The egg body limit transmission device and contactless coding device were activated only in the case of breeding eggs, and the breeding goose information was printed on the egg bodies in the form of quick response codes (QR codes), which enabled the breeding egg information to correspond with the breeding goose information. An evaluative experiment was performed using a system for the selection of high-quality breeding geese, with web cameras and a cloud monitoring platform. The breeding geese were allowed 14 days to become accustomed to the experimental environment before monitoring began. The evaluative experiment results showed that the pass rate of egg body coding reached 98.25%, the improved SSD algorithm was 8.65% more accurate and 62.6 ms faster than traditional SSD, and the accuracy rate corresponding to the individual information of the breeding geese and the surface information of the goose eggs was 97.8%. The experimental results met the requirements of accurate marking of individual information of breeding geese, which can provide technical support for the selection of high-quality breeding geese.
Collapse
|
2
|
Dardouri S, BuHamdan S, Al Balkhy W, Dakhli Z, Danel T, Lafhaj Z. RFID platform for construction materials management. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 2022. [DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2022.2073085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Safa Dardouri
- Laboratoire de Mécanique Multiphysique Multiéchelle, LaMcube, UMR 9013, Centrale Lille, CNRS, Université de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Samer BuHamdan
- Laboratoire de Mécanique Multiphysique Multiéchelle, LaMcube, UMR 9013, Centrale Lille, CNRS, Université de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Wassim Al Balkhy
- Laboratoire de Mécanique Multiphysique Multiéchelle, LaMcube, UMR 9013, Centrale Lille, CNRS, Université de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Zakaria Dakhli
- Department of Engineering, Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Thomas Danel
- Laboratoire de Mécanique Multiphysique Multiéchelle, LaMcube, UMR 9013, Centrale Lille, CNRS, Université de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Zoubeir Lafhaj
- Laboratoire de Mécanique Multiphysique Multiéchelle, LaMcube, UMR 9013, Centrale Lille, CNRS, Université de Lille, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
The concepts of smart agriculture, with the aim of highly automated industrial mass production leaning towards self-farming, can be scaled down to the level of small farms and homesteads, with the use of more affordable electronic components and open-source software. The backbone of smart agriculture, in both cases, is the Internet of Things (IoT). Single-board computers (SBCs) such as a Raspberry Pi, working under Linux or Windows IoT operating systems, make affordable platform for smart devices with modular architecture, suitable for automation of various tasks by using machine learning (ML), artificial intelligence (AI) and computer vision (CV). Similarly, the Arduino microcontroller enables the building of nodes in the IoT network, capable of reading various physical values, wirelessly sending them to other computers for processing and furthermore, controlling electronic elements and machines in the physical world based on the received data. This review gives a limited overview of currently available technologies for smart automation of industrial agricultural production and of alternative, smaller-scale projects applicable in homesteads, based on Arduino and Raspberry Pi hardware, as well as a draft proposal of an integrated homestead automation system based on the IoT.
Collapse
|
4
|
Wolc A, Settar P, Fulton JE, Arango J, Rowland K, Lubritz D, Dekkers JCM. Heritability of perching behavior and its genetic relationship with incidence of floor eggs in Rhode Island Red chickens. Genet Sel Evol 2021; 53:38. [PMID: 33882840 PMCID: PMC8059289 DOI: 10.1186/s12711-021-00630-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background As cage-free production systems become increasingly popular, behavioral traits such as nesting behavior and temperament have become more important. The objective of this study was to estimate heritabilities for frequency of perching and proportion of floor eggs and their genetic correlation in two Rhode Island Red lines. Results The percent of hens observed perching tended to increase and the proportion of eggs laid on the floor tended to decrease as the test progressed. This suggests the ability of hens to learn to use nests and perches. Under the bivariate repeatability model, estimates of heritability in the two lines were 0.22 ± 0.04 and 0.07 ± 0.05 for the percent of hens perching, and 0.52 ± 0.05 and 0.45 ± 0.05 for the percent of floor eggs. Estimates of the genetic correlation between perching and floor eggs were − 0.26 ± 0.14 and − 0.19 ± 0.27 for the two lines, suggesting that, genetically, there was some tendency for hens that better use perches to also use nests; but the phenotypic correlation was close to zero. Random regression models indicated the presence of a genetic component for learning ability. Conclusions In conclusion, perching and tendency to lay floor eggs were shown to be a learned behavior, which stresses the importance of proper management and training of pullets and young hens. A significant genetic component was found, confirming the possibility to improve nesting behavior for cage-free systems through genetic selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Wolc
- Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, 806 Stange Road, 239E Kildee Hall, Ames, IA, 50010, USA. .,Hy-Line International, 2583 240th Street, Dallas Center, IA, 50063, USA.
| | - Petek Settar
- Hy-Line International, 2583 240th Street, Dallas Center, IA, 50063, USA
| | - Janet E Fulton
- Hy-Line International, 2583 240th Street, Dallas Center, IA, 50063, USA
| | - Jesus Arango
- Hy-Line International, 2583 240th Street, Dallas Center, IA, 50063, USA
| | - Kaylee Rowland
- Hy-Line International, 2583 240th Street, Dallas Center, IA, 50063, USA
| | - Danny Lubritz
- Hy-Line International, 2583 240th Street, Dallas Center, IA, 50063, USA
| | - Jack C M Dekkers
- Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, 806 Stange Road, 239E Kildee Hall, Ames, IA, 50010, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Increasing Profitability and Monitoring Environmental Performance: A Case Study in the Agri-Food Industry through an Edge-IoT Platform. SUSTAINABILITY 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/su13010283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Globalization has led to a new paradigm where the traditional industries, such as agriculture, employ vanguard technologies to broaden its possibilities into what is known as smart farming and the agri-food industry 4.0. This industry needs to adapt to the current market through an efficient use of resources while being environmentally friendly. The most commonly used approaches for analyzing efficiency and sustainability on farms are production efficiency based analyses, such as Data Envelopment Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Analysis, since they allow to see how efficient the outputs are generated regardless of the units of measurement of the inputs. This work presents a real scenario for making farms more profitable and sustainable through the analysis of the Data Envelopment Analysis and the application of the Internet of Things and Edge Computing. What makes this model interesting is that it allows monitoring the ambient conditions with real-time data from the different sensors that have been installed on the farm, minimizing costs and gaining robustness in the transmission of the data to the cloud with Edge Computing, and then to have a complete overview in terms of monthly resource efficiency through the Data Envelopment Analysis. The results show that including the costs of edge and non-edge data transfer have an impact on the efficiency. This small-scale study set the basis for a future test with many farms simultaneously.
Collapse
|
6
|
Navarro E, Costa N, Pereira A. A Systematic Review of IoT Solutions for Smart Farming. SENSORS 2020; 20:s20154231. [PMID: 32751366 PMCID: PMC7436012 DOI: 10.3390/s20154231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
The world population growth is increasing the demand for food production. Furthermore, the reduction of the workforce in rural areas and the increase in production costs are challenges for food production nowadays. Smart farming is a farm management concept that may use Internet of Things (IoT) to overcome the current challenges of food production. This work uses the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews (PRISMA) methodology to systematically review the existing literature on smart farming with IoT. The review aims to identify the main devices, platforms, network protocols, processing data technologies and the applicability of smart farming with IoT to agriculture. The review shows an evolution in the way data is processed in recent years. Traditional approaches mostly used data in a reactive manner. In more recent approaches, however, new technological developments allowed the use of data to prevent crop problems and to improve the accuracy of crop diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emerson Navarro
- School of Technology and Management, Computer Science and Communication Research Centre, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Campus 2, Morro do Lena—Alto do Vieiro, Apartado 4163, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal; (E.N.); (N.C.)
| | - Nuno Costa
- School of Technology and Management, Computer Science and Communication Research Centre, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Campus 2, Morro do Lena—Alto do Vieiro, Apartado 4163, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal; (E.N.); (N.C.)
| | - António Pereira
- School of Technology and Management, Computer Science and Communication Research Centre, Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, Campus 2, Morro do Lena—Alto do Vieiro, Apartado 4163, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal; (E.N.); (N.C.)
- INOV INESC Inovação, Institute of New Technologies, Leiria Office, Campus 2, Morro do Lena—Alto do Vieiro, Apartado 4163, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Assessing the Activity of Individual Group-Housed Broilers Throughout Life using a Passive Radio Frequency Identification System-A Validation Study. SENSORS 2020; 20:s20133612. [PMID: 32604998 PMCID: PMC7374484 DOI: 10.3390/s20133612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Individual data are valuable for assessing the health, welfare and performance of broilers. In particular, data on the first few days of life are needed to study the predictive value of traits recorded early in life for later life performance. However, broilers are generally kept in groups, which hampers individual identification and monitoring of animals. Sensor technologies may aid in identifying and monitoring individual animals. In this study, a passive radio frequency identification (RFID) system was implemented to record broiler activity, in combination with traditional video recordings. The two main objectives were (1) to validate the output of the RFID system by comparing it to the recorded locations on video, and (2) to assess whether the number of antennas visited per unit time could serve as a measure of activity, by comparing it to the distance recorded on video and to the distance moved as recorded using a validated ultra-wideband (UWB) tracking system. The locations recorded by the RFID system exactly matched the video in 62.5% of the cases, and in 99.2% of the cases when allowing for a deviation of one antenna grid cell. There were moderately strong Spearman rank correlations between the distance recorded with the RFID system and the distance recorded from video (rs = 0.82) and between UWB and RFID (rs = 0.70) in approximately one-hour recordings, indicating that the RFID system can adequately track relative individual broiler activity, i.e., the activity level of a broiler in comparison to its group members. As the RFID tags are small and lightweight, the RFID system is well suited for monitoring the individual activity of group-housed broilers throughout life.
Collapse
|
8
|
Review: Automated techniques for monitoring the behaviour and welfare of broilers and laying hens: towards the goal of precision livestock farming. Animal 2020; 14:617-625. [DOI: 10.1017/s1751731119002155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
|
9
|
A Systematic Review of Precision Livestock Farming in the Poultry Sector: Is Technology Focussed on Improving Bird Welfare? Animals (Basel) 2019; 9:ani9090614. [PMID: 31461984 PMCID: PMC6770384 DOI: 10.3390/ani9090614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2019] [Revised: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 08/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Precision livestock farming (PLF) is the use of technology to help farmers monitor and manage their animals and their farm. This technology can help to improve animal welfare by enabling farmers to act as soon as any problem arises. However, the technology can also be used to increase production efficiency on the farm, which could be prioritised over the animals’ welfare. The aim of this study was to give an overview of PLF technology development in poultry farming, and to investigate whether improving welfare has been the main goal of PLF development. The results suggest that PLF development in poultry farming so far has focussed on improving animal health and welfare, more so than increasing production. However, despite the interest in PLF research for poultry farming across the world (especially in the USA, China and Belgium), most of the technology is still being developed (prototypes); only a few are available for farmers to buy and use. This means that future work should focus on making these technologies commercially available to farmers, so that systems developed to improve welfare can be used to improve the welfare of farmed birds in the real world. Abstract Precision livestock farming (PLF) systems have the potential to improve animal welfare through providing a continuous picture of welfare states in real time and enabling fast interventions that benefit the current flock. However, it remains unclear whether the goal of PLF development has been to improve welfare or increase production efficiency. The aims of this systematic literature review are to provide an overview of the current state of PLF in poultry farming and investigate whether the focus of PLF research has been to improve bird welfare. The study characteristics extracted from 264 peer-reviewed publications and conference proceedings suggest that poultry PLF has received increasing attention on a global scale, but is yet to become a widespread commercial reality. PLF development has most commonly focussed on broiler farming, followed by laying hens, and mainly involves the use of sensors (environmental and wearable) and cameras. More publications had animal health and welfare than production as either one of or the only goal, suggesting that PLF development so far has focussed on improving animal health and welfare. Future work should prioritise improving the rate of commercialisation of PLF systems, so that their potential to improve bird welfare might be realised.
Collapse
|
10
|
Bridge ES, Wilhelm J, Pandit MM, Moreno A, Curry CM, Pearson TD, Proppe DS, Holwerda C, Eadie JM, Stair TF, Olson AC, Lyon BE, Branch CL, Pitera AM, Kozlovsky D, Sonnenberg BR, Pravosudov VV, Ruyle JE. An Arduino-Based RFID Platform for Animal Research. Front Ecol Evol 2019. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
11
|
Ellen ED, van der Sluis M, Siegford J, Guzhva O, Toscano MJ, Bennewitz J, van der Zande LE, van der Eijk JAJ, de Haas EN, Norton T, Piette D, Tetens J, de Klerk B, Visser B, Rodenburg TB. Review of Sensor Technologies in Animal Breeding: Phenotyping Behaviors of Laying Hens to Select Against Feather Pecking. Animals (Basel) 2019; 9:ani9030108. [PMID: 30909407 PMCID: PMC6466287 DOI: 10.3390/ani9030108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2019] [Revised: 03/15/2019] [Accepted: 03/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Action GroupHouseNet aims to provide synergy among scientists to prevent damaging behavior in group-housed pigs and laying hens. One goal of this network is to determine how genetic and genomic tools can be used to breed animals that are less likely to perform damaging behavior on their pen-mates. In this review, the focus is on feather-pecking behavior in laying hens. Reducing feather pecking in large groups of hens is a challenge, because it is difficult to identify and monitor individual birds. However, current developments in sensor technologies and animal breeding have the potential to identify individual animals, monitor individual behavior, and link this information back to the underlying genotype. We describe a combination of sensor technologies and “-omics” approaches that could be used to select against feather-pecking behavior in laying hens. Abstract Damaging behaviors, like feather pecking (FP), have large economic and welfare consequences in the commercial laying hen industry. Selective breeding can be used to obtain animals that are less likely to perform damaging behavior on their pen-mates. However, with the growing tendency to keep birds in large groups, identifying specific birds that are performing or receiving FP is difficult. With current developments in sensor technologies, it may now be possible to identify laying hens in large groups that show less FP behavior and select them for breeding. We propose using a combination of sensor technology and genomic methods to identify feather peckers and victims in groups. In this review, we will describe the use of “-omics” approaches to understand FP and give an overview of sensor technologies that can be used for animal monitoring, such as ultra-wideband, radio frequency identification, and computer vision. We will then discuss the identification of indicator traits from both sensor technologies and genomics approaches that can be used to select animals for breeding against damaging behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther D Ellen
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Malou van der Sluis
- Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands.
- Department of Animals in Science and Society, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Janice Siegford
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Group, Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
| | - Oleksiy Guzhva
- Department Biosystems and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 230 53 Alnarp, Sweden.
| | - Michael J Toscano
- Center for Proper Housing: Poultry and Rabbits University of Bern, CH 3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland.
| | - Jörn Bennewitz
- Institute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
| | - Lisette E van der Zande
- Adaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Jerine A J van der Eijk
- Adaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands.
- Behavioural Ecology Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Elske N de Haas
- Department of Animals in Science and Society, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Animal Sciences Unit, 9090 Melle, Belgium.
| | - Tomas Norton
- M3-BIORES, Division Animal and Human Health Engineering, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium.
| | - Deborah Piette
- M3-BIORES, Division Animal and Human Health Engineering, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium.
| | - Jens Tetens
- Functional Breeding Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Georg-August University, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
| | | | - Bram Visser
- Hendrix Genetics Research, Technology & Services B.V., 5830 AC Boxmeer, The Netherlands.
| | - T Bas Rodenburg
- Department of Animals in Science and Society, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Adaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|