1
|
Mustafa G, Liu Y, Khan IH, Hussain S, Jiang Y, Liu J, Arshad S, Osman R. Establishing a knowledge structure for yield prediction in cereal crops using unmanned aerial vehicles. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2024; 15:1401246. [PMID: 39184579 PMCID: PMC11341481 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1401246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 08/27/2024]
Abstract
Recently, a rapid advancement in using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for yield prediction (YP) has led to many YP research findings. This study aims to visualize the intellectual background, research progress, knowledge structure, and main research frontiers of the entire YP domain for main cereal crops using VOSviewer and a comprehensive literature review. To develop visualization networks of UAVs related knowledge for YP of wheat, maize, rice, and soybean (WMRS) crops, the original research articles published between January 2001 and August 2023 were retrieved from the web of science core collection (WOSCC) database. Significant contributors have been observed to the growth of YP-related research, including the most active countries, prolific publications, productive writers and authors, the top contributing institutions, influential journals, papers, and keywords. Furthermore, the study observed the primary contributions of YP for WMRS crops using UAVs at the micro, meso, and macro levels and the degree of collaboration and information sources for YP. Moreover, the policy assistance from the People's Republic of China, the United States of America, Germany, and Australia considerably advances the knowledge of UAVs connected to YP of WMRS crops, revealed under investigation of grants and collaborating nations. Lastly, the findings of WMRS crops for YP are presented regarding the data type, algorithms, results, and study location. The remote sensing community can significantly benefit from this study by being able to discriminate between the most critical sub-domains of the YP literature for WMRS crops utilizing UAVs and to recommend new research frontiers for concentrating on the essential directions for subsequent studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghulam Mustafa
- Key Laboratory of Integrated Regulation and Resource Development on Shallow Lakes, Ministry of Education, College of Environment, Hohai University, Nanjing, China
- College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yuhong Liu
- Key Laboratory of Integrated Regulation and Resource Development on Shallow Lakes, Ministry of Education, College of Environment, Hohai University, Nanjing, China
| | - Imran Haider Khan
- College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
| | - Sarfraz Hussain
- College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yuhan Jiang
- Key Laboratory of Integrated Regulation and Resource Development on Shallow Lakes, Ministry of Education, College of Environment, Hohai University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jiayuan Liu
- Key Laboratory of Integrated Regulation and Resource Development on Shallow Lakes, Ministry of Education, College of Environment, Hohai University, Nanjing, China
| | - Saeed Arshad
- College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
| | - Raheel Osman
- Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ou C, Jia Z, Sun S, Liu J, Ma W, Wang J, Mi C, Mao P. Using Machine Learning Methods Combined with Vegetation Indices and Growth Indicators to Predict Seed Yield of Bromus inermis. PLANTS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2024; 13:773. [PMID: 38592838 PMCID: PMC10974845 DOI: 10.3390/plants13060773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
Smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis) is a perennial, high-quality forage grass. However, its seed yield is influenced by agronomic practices, climatic conditions, and the growing year. The rapid and effective prediction of seed yield can assist growers in making informed production decisions and reducing agricultural risks. Our field trial design followed a completely randomized block design with four blocks and three nitrogen levels (0, 100, and 200 kg·N·ha-1) during 2022 and 2023. Data on the remote vegetation index (RVI), the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), the leaf nitrogen content (LNC), and the leaf area index (LAI) were collected at heading, anthesis, and milk stages. Multiple linear regression (MLR), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF) regression models were utilized to predict seed yield. In 2022, the results indicated that nitrogen application provided a sufficiently large range of variation of seed yield (ranging from 45.79 to 379.45 kg ha⁻¹). Correlation analysis showed that the indices of the RVI, the NDVI, the LNC, and the LAI in 2022 presented significant positive correlation with seed yield, and the highest correlation coefficient was observed at the heading stage. The data from 2022 were utilized to formulate a predictive model for seed yield. The results suggested that utilizing data from the heading stage produced the best prediction performance. SVM and RF outperformed MLR in prediction, with RF demonstrating the highest performance (R2 = 0.75, RMSE = 51.93 kg ha-1, MAE = 29.43 kg ha-1, and MAPE = 0.17). Notably, the accuracy of predicting seed yield for the year 2023 using this model had decreased. Feature importance analysis of the RF model revealed that LNC was a crucial indicator for predicting smooth bromegrass seed yield. Further studies with an expanded dataset and integration of weather data are needed to improve the accuracy and generalizability of the model and adaptability for the growing year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Peisheng Mao
- Forage Seed Laboratory, College of Grassland Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; (C.O.); (S.S.); (J.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jamali M, Soufizadeh S, Yeganeh B, Emam Y. Wheat leaf traits monitoring based on machine learning algorithms and high-resolution satellite imagery. ECOL INFORM 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
4
|
Developing Novel Rice Yield Index Using UAV Remote Sensing Imagery Fusion Technology. DRONES 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/drones6060151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Efficient and quick yield prediction is of great significance for ensuring world food security and crop breeding research. The rapid development of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) technology makes it more timely and accurate to monitor crops by remote sensing. The objective of this study was to explore the method of developing a novel yield index (YI) with wide adaptability for yield prediction by fusing vegetation indices (VIs), color indices (CIs), and texture indices (TIs) from UAV-based imagery. Six field experiments with 24 varieties of rice and 21 fertilization methods were carried out in three experimental stations in 2019 and 2020. The multispectral and RGB images of the rice canopy collected by the UAV platform were used to rebuild six new VIs and TIs. The performance of VI-based YI (MAPE = 13.98%) developed by quadratic nonlinear regression at the maturity stage was better than other stages, and outperformed that of CI-based (MAPE = 22.21%) and TI-based (MAPE = 18.60%). Then six VIs, six CIs, and six TIs were fused to build YI by multiple linear regression and random forest models. Compared with heading stage (R2 = 0.78, MAPE = 9.72%) and all stage (R2 = 0.59, MAPE = 22.21%), the best performance of YI was developed by random forest with fusing VIs + CIs + TIs at maturity stage (R2 = 0.84, MAPE = 7.86%). Our findings suggest that the novel YI proposed in this study has great potential in crop yield monitoring.
Collapse
|
5
|
Danilevicz MF, Bayer PE, Nestor BJ, Bennamoun M, Edwards D. Resources for image-based high-throughput phenotyping in crops and data sharing challenges. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY 2021; 187:699-715. [PMID: 34608963 PMCID: PMC8561249 DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiab301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
High-throughput phenotyping (HTP) platforms are capable of monitoring the phenotypic variation of plants through multiple types of sensors, such as red green and blue (RGB) cameras, hyperspectral sensors, and computed tomography, which can be associated with environmental and genotypic data. Because of the wide range of information provided, HTP datasets represent a valuable asset to characterize crop phenotypes. As HTP becomes widely employed with more tools and data being released, it is important that researchers are aware of these resources and how they can be applied to accelerate crop improvement. Researchers may exploit these datasets either for phenotype comparison or employ them as a benchmark to assess tool performance and to support the development of tools that are better at generalizing between different crops and environments. In this review, we describe the use of image-based HTP for yield prediction, root phenotyping, development of climate-resilient crops, detecting pathogen and pest infestation, and quantitative trait measurement. We emphasize the need for researchers to share phenotypic data, and offer a comprehensive list of available datasets to assist crop breeders and tool developers to leverage these resources in order to accelerate crop breeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica F. Danilevicz
- School of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia
| | - Philipp E. Bayer
- School of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia
| | - Benjamin J. Nestor
- School of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia
| | - Mohammed Bennamoun
- Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia
| | - David Edwards
- School of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia
- Author for communication:
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dong X, Peng B, Sieckenius S, Raman R, Conley MM, Leskovar DI. Leaf water potential of field crops estimated using NDVI in ground-based remote sensing-opportunities to increase prediction precision. PeerJ 2021; 9:e12005. [PMID: 34466291 PMCID: PMC8380031 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Remote-sensing using normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) has the potential of rapidly detecting the effect of water stress on field crops. However, this detection has typically been accomplished only after the stress effect led to significant changes in crop green biomass, leaf area index, angle and position, and few studies have attempted to estimate the uncertainties of the regression models. These have limited the informed interpretation of NDVI data in agricultural applications. We built a ground-based sensing cart and used it to calibrate the relationships between NDVI and leaf water potential (LWP) for wheat, corn, and cotton growing under field conditions. Both the methods of ordinary least-squares (OLS) and weighted least-squares (WLS) were employed in data analysis, and measurement errors in both LWP and NDVI were considered. We also used statistical resampling to test the effect of measurement errors of LWP on the uncertainties of model coefficients. Our data showed that obtaining a high value of the coefficient of determination did not guarantee a high prediction precision in the obtained regression models. Large prediction uncertainties were estimated for all three crops, and the regressions obtained were not always significant. The best models were obtained for cotton with a prediction uncertainty of 27%. We found that considering measurement errors for both LWP and NDVI led to reduced uncertainties in model coefficients. Also, reducing the sample size of LWP measurement led to significantly increased uncertainties in the coefficients of the linear models describing the LWP-NDVI relationship. Finally, potential strategies for reducing the uncertainty relative to the range of NDVI measurement are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuejun Dong
- Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center at Uvalde, Uvalde, TX, United States
| | - Bin Peng
- Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng City, Jiangsu, China
| | - Shane Sieckenius
- Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center at Uvalde, Uvalde, TX, United States
| | - Rahul Raman
- Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center at Uvalde, Uvalde, TX, United States.,Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
| | - Matthew M Conley
- USDA-ARS, U.S. Arid-Land Agricultural Research Center, Maricopa, AZ, United States
| | - Daniel I Leskovar
- Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center at Uvalde, Uvalde, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jiang J, Wang C, Wang H, Fu Z, Cao Q, Tian Y, Zhu Y, Cao W, Liu X. Evaluation of Three Portable Optical Sensors for Non-Destructive Diagnosis of Nitrogen Status in Winter Wheat. SENSORS 2021; 21:s21165579. [PMID: 34451022 PMCID: PMC8402299 DOI: 10.3390/s21165579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The accurate estimation and timely diagnosis of crop nitrogen (N) status can facilitate in-season fertilizer management. In order to evaluate the performance of three leaf and canopy optical sensors in non-destructively diagnosing winter wheat N status, three experiments using seven wheat cultivars and multi-N-treatments (0–360 kg N ha−1) were conducted in the Jiangsu province of China from 2015 to 2018. Two leaf sensors (SPAD 502, Dualex 4 Scientific+) and one canopy sensor (RapidSCAN CS-45) were used to obtain leaf and canopy spectral data, respectively, during the main growth period. Five N indicators (leaf N concentration (LNC), leaf N accumulation (LNA), plant N concentration (PNC), plant N accumulation (PNA), and N nutrition index (NNI)) were measured synchronously. The relationships between the six sensor-based indices (leaf level: SPAD, Chl, Flav, NBI, canopy level: NDRE, NDVI) and five N parameters were established at each growth stages. The results showed that the Dualex-based NBI performed relatively well among four leaf-sensor indices, while NDRE of RS sensor achieved a best performance due to larger sampling area of canopy sensor for five N indicators estimation across different growth stages. The areal agreement of the NNI diagnosis models ranged from 0.54 to 0.71 for SPAD, 0.66 to 0.84 for NBI, and 0.72 to 0.86 for NDRE, and the kappa coefficient ranged from 0.30 to 0.52 for SPAD, 0.42 to 0.72 for NBI, and 0.53 to 0.75 for NDRE across all growth stages. Overall, these results reveal the potential of sensor-based diagnosis models for the rapid and non-destructive diagnosis of N status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Jiang
- National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; (J.J.); (C.W.); (H.W.); (Z.F.); (Q.C.); (Y.T.); (Y.Z.); (W.C.)
- MOE Engineering Research Center of Smart Agricultural, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- MARA Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Cuicun Wang
- National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; (J.J.); (C.W.); (H.W.); (Z.F.); (Q.C.); (Y.T.); (Y.Z.); (W.C.)
- MOE Engineering Research Center of Smart Agricultural, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- MARA Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Hui Wang
- National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; (J.J.); (C.W.); (H.W.); (Z.F.); (Q.C.); (Y.T.); (Y.Z.); (W.C.)
- MOE Engineering Research Center of Smart Agricultural, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- MARA Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Zhaopeng Fu
- National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; (J.J.); (C.W.); (H.W.); (Z.F.); (Q.C.); (Y.T.); (Y.Z.); (W.C.)
- MOE Engineering Research Center of Smart Agricultural, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- MARA Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Qiang Cao
- National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; (J.J.); (C.W.); (H.W.); (Z.F.); (Q.C.); (Y.T.); (Y.Z.); (W.C.)
- MOE Engineering Research Center of Smart Agricultural, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- MARA Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Yongchao Tian
- National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; (J.J.); (C.W.); (H.W.); (Z.F.); (Q.C.); (Y.T.); (Y.Z.); (W.C.)
- MOE Engineering Research Center of Smart Agricultural, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- MARA Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Yan Zhu
- National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; (J.J.); (C.W.); (H.W.); (Z.F.); (Q.C.); (Y.T.); (Y.Z.); (W.C.)
- MOE Engineering Research Center of Smart Agricultural, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- MARA Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Weixing Cao
- National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; (J.J.); (C.W.); (H.W.); (Z.F.); (Q.C.); (Y.T.); (Y.Z.); (W.C.)
- MOE Engineering Research Center of Smart Agricultural, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- MARA Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Xiaojun Liu
- National Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; (J.J.); (C.W.); (H.W.); (Z.F.); (Q.C.); (Y.T.); (Y.Z.); (W.C.)
- MOE Engineering Research Center of Smart Agricultural, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- MARA Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +86-25-8439-6804; Fax: +86-25-8439-6672
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Use of an Active Canopy Sensor Mounted on an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle to Monitor the Growth and Nitrogen Status of Winter Wheat. REMOTE SENSING 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/rs12223684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Using remote sensing to rapidly acquire large-area crop growth information (e.g., shoot biomass, nitrogen status) is an urgent demand for modern crop production; unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) acts as an effective monitoring platform. In order to improve the practicability and efficiency of UAV based monitoring technique, four field experiments involving different nitrogen (N) rates (0–360 kg N ha−1) and seven winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties were conducted at different eco-sites (Sihong, Rugao, and Xinghua) during 2015–2019. A multispectral active canopy sensor (RapidSCAN CS-45; Holland Scientific Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) mounted on a multirotor UAV platform was used to collect the canopy spectral reflectance data of winter wheat at key growth stages, three growth parameters (leaf area index (LAI), leaf dry matter (LDM), plant dry matter (PDM)) and three N indicators (leaf N accumulation (LNA), plant N accumulation (PNA) and N nutrition index (NNI)) were measured synchronously. The quantitative linear relationships between spectral data and six growth indices were systematically analyzed. For monitoring growth and N nutrition status at Feekes stages 6.0–10.0, 10.3–11.1 or entire growth stages, red edge ratio vegetation index (RERVI), red edge chlorophyll index (CIRE) and difference vegetation index (DVI) performed the best among the red edge band-based and red-based vegetation indices, respectively. Across all growth stages, DVI was highly correlated with LAI (R2 = 0.78), LDM (R2 = 0.61), PDM (R2 = 0.63), LNA (R2 = 0.65) and PNA (R2 = 0.73), whereas the relationships between RERVI (R2 = 0.62), CIRE (R2 = 0.62) and NNI had high coefficients of determination. The developed models performed better in monitoring growth indices and N status at Feekes stages 10.3–11.1 than Feekes stages 6.0–10.0. To sum it up, the UAV-mounted active sensor system is able to rapidly monitor the growth and N nutrition status of winter wheat and can be deployed for UAV-based remote-sensing of crops.
Collapse
|
9
|
Li H, Lin W, Pang F, Jiang X, Cao W, Zhu Y, Ni J. Monitoring Wheat Growth Using a Portable Three-Band Instrument for Crop Growth Monitoring and Diagnosis. SENSORS 2020; 20:s20102894. [PMID: 32443796 PMCID: PMC7285128 DOI: 10.3390/s20102894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Revised: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
An instrument developed to monitor and diagnose crop growth can quickly and non-destructively obtain crop growth information, which is helpful for crop field production and management. Focusing on the problems with existing two-band instruments used for crop growth monitoring and diagnosis, such as insufficient information available on crop growth and low accuracy of some growth indices retrieval, our research team developed a portable three-band instrument for crop-growth monitoring and diagnosis (CGMD) that obtains a larger amount of information. Based on CGMD, this paper carried out studies on monitoring wheat growth indices. According to the acquired three-band reflectance spectra, the combined indices were constructed by combining different bands, two-band vegetation indices (NDVI, RVI, and DVI), and three-band vegetation indices (TVI-1 and TVI-2). The fitting results of the vegetation indices obtained by CGMD and the commercial instrument FieldSpec HandHeld2 was high and the new instrument could be used for monitoring the canopy vegetation indices. By fitting each vegetation index to the growth index, the results showed that the optimal vegetation indices corresponding to leaf area index (LAI), leaf dry weight (LDW), leaf nitrogen content (LNC), and leaf nitrogen accumulation (LNA) were TVI-2, TVI-1, NDVI (R730, R815), and NDVI (R730, R815), respectively. R2 values corresponding to LAI, LDW, LNC and LNA were 0.64, 0.84, 0.60, and 0.82, respectively, and their relative root mean square error (RRMSE) values were 0.29, 0.26, 0.17, and 0.30, respectively. The addition of the red spectral band to CGMD effectively improved the monitoring results of wheat LAI and LDW. Focusing the problem of vegetation index saturation, this paper proposed a method to construct the wheat-growth-index spectral monitoring models that were defined according to the growth periods. It improved the prediction accuracy of LAI, LDW, and LNA, with R2 values of 0.79, 0.85, and 0.85, respectively, and the RRMSE values of these growth indices were 0.22, 0.23, and 0.28, respectively. The method proposed here could be used for the guidance of wheat field cultivation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huaimin Li
- College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; (H.L.); (W.L.); (F.P.); (X.J.); (W.C.); (Y.Z.)
- National Information Agricultural Engineering Technology Center, Nanjing 210095, China
- Engineering Research Center of Smart Agriculture, Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for the Technology and Application of Internet of Things, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Weipan Lin
- College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; (H.L.); (W.L.); (F.P.); (X.J.); (W.C.); (Y.Z.)
- National Information Agricultural Engineering Technology Center, Nanjing 210095, China
- Engineering Research Center of Smart Agriculture, Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for the Technology and Application of Internet of Things, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Fangrong Pang
- College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; (H.L.); (W.L.); (F.P.); (X.J.); (W.C.); (Y.Z.)
- National Information Agricultural Engineering Technology Center, Nanjing 210095, China
- Engineering Research Center of Smart Agriculture, Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for the Technology and Application of Internet of Things, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Xiaoping Jiang
- College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; (H.L.); (W.L.); (F.P.); (X.J.); (W.C.); (Y.Z.)
- National Information Agricultural Engineering Technology Center, Nanjing 210095, China
- Engineering Research Center of Smart Agriculture, Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for the Technology and Application of Internet of Things, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Weixing Cao
- College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; (H.L.); (W.L.); (F.P.); (X.J.); (W.C.); (Y.Z.)
- National Information Agricultural Engineering Technology Center, Nanjing 210095, China
- Engineering Research Center of Smart Agriculture, Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for the Technology and Application of Internet of Things, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Yan Zhu
- College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; (H.L.); (W.L.); (F.P.); (X.J.); (W.C.); (Y.Z.)
- National Information Agricultural Engineering Technology Center, Nanjing 210095, China
- Engineering Research Center of Smart Agriculture, Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for the Technology and Application of Internet of Things, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Jun Ni
- College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; (H.L.); (W.L.); (F.P.); (X.J.); (W.C.); (Y.Z.)
- National Information Agricultural Engineering Technology Center, Nanjing 210095, China
- Engineering Research Center of Smart Agriculture, Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210095, China
- Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for the Technology and Application of Internet of Things, Nanjing 210095, China
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +86-25-8439-6593
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jiang J, Wang C, Wang Y, Cao Q, Tian Y, Zhu Y, Cao W, Liu X. Using an Active Sensor to Develop New Critical Nitrogen Dilution Curve for Winter Wheat. SENSORS 2020; 20:s20061577. [PMID: 32178244 PMCID: PMC7146448 DOI: 10.3390/s20061577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Revised: 03/08/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Critical nitrogen (N) dilution curves (CNDCs) have been developed to describe the dilution dynamic of N and to diagnose N status in plants. In this study, to develop a convenient alternative CNDC determination method, four field experiments involving different N rates (0–360 kg N ha-1) and six wheat varieties were performed at different eco-sites from 2014 to 2019. The normalised difference red-edge (NDRE) index extracted from the RapidSCAN CS-45 (Holland Scientific Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) sensor was used as a driving factor instead of plant dry matter (PDM) to establish a new alternative winter wheat CNDC. The newly developed CNDC was described by the equation Nc = 0.90NDRE−0.88, when NDRE values were ≤ 0.19 and constant Nc = 3.81%, which was independent of the NDRE values. Compared to PDM-derived CNDC (R2 = 0.73) developed with the same dataset, a comparable precision was obtained using NDRE-derived CNDC (R2 = 0.76) and both CNDCs could accurately discriminate wheat N status. Moreover, the NDRE could be inexpensively and rapidly measured using the active sensor. The relationship between NDRE-derived CNDC and grain yield was also analysed to facilitate in-season N management, and the R2 value reached 0.79 and 0.87 at jointing and booting stages, respectively. The NDRE-based CNDC can be used to effectively diagnose wheat N status and as an alternative approach for non-destructive determination of crop N levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Xiaojun Liu
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +86-25-8439-6804; Fax: +86-25-8439-6672
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Using Hand-Held Chlorophyll Meters and Canopy Reflectance Sensors for Fertilizer Nitrogen Management in Cereals in Small Farms in Developing Countries. SENSORS 2020; 20:s20041127. [PMID: 32092989 PMCID: PMC7070990 DOI: 10.3390/s20041127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2020] [Revised: 02/15/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
To produce enough food, smallholder farmers in developing countries apply fertilizer nitrogen (N) to cereals, sometimes even more than the local recommendations. During the last two decades, hand-held chlorophyll meters and canopy reflectance sensors, which can detect the N needs of the crop based on transmission and reflectance properties of leaves through proximal sensing, have been studied as tools for optimizing crop N status in cereals in developing countries. This review aims to describe the outcome of these studies. Chlorophyll meters are used to manage fertilizer N to maintain a threshold leaf chlorophyll content throughout the cropping season. Despite greater reliability of the sufficiency index approach, the fixed threshold chlorophyll content approach has been investigated more for using chlorophyll meters in rice and wheat. GreenSeeker and Crop Circle crop reflectance sensors take into account both N status and biomass of the crop to estimate additional fertilizer N requirement but only a few studies have been carried out in developing countries to develop N management strategies in rice, wheat and maize. Both chlorophyll meters and canopy reflectance sensors can increase fertilizer N use efficiency by reduction of N rates. Dedicated economic analysis of the proximal sensing strategies for managing fertilizer N in cereals in developing countries is not adequately available.
Collapse
|
12
|
Wheat Growth Monitoring and Yield Estimation based on Multi-Rotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. REMOTE SENSING 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/rs12030508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Leaf area index (LAI) and leaf dry matter (LDM) are important indices of crop growth. Real-time, nondestructive monitoring of crop growth is instructive for the diagnosis of crop growth and prediction of grain yield. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based remote sensing is widely used in precision agriculture due to its unique advantages in flexibility and resolution. This study was carried out on wheat trials treated with different nitrogen levels and seeding densities in three regions of Jiangsu Province in 2018–2019. Canopy spectral images were collected by the UAV equipped with a multi-spectral camera during key wheat growth stages. To verify the results of the UAV images, the LAI, LDM, and yield data were obtained by destructive sampling. We extracted the wheat canopy reflectance and selected the best vegetation index for monitoring growth and predicting yield. Simple linear regression (LR), multiple linear regression (MLR), stepwise multiple linear regression (SMLR), partial least squares regression (PLSR), artificial neural network (ANN), and random forest (RF) modeling methods were used to construct a model for wheat yield estimation. The results show that the multi-spectral camera mounted on the multi-rotor UAV has a broad application prospect in crop growth index monitoring and yield estimation. The vegetation index combined with the red edge band and the near-infrared band was significantly correlated with LAI and LDM. Machine learning methods (i.e., PLSR, ANN, and RF) performed better for predicting wheat yield. The RF model constructed by normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) at the jointing stage, heading stage, flowering stage, and filling stage was the optimal wheat yield estimation model in this study, with an R2 of 0.78 and relative root mean square error (RRMSE) of 0.1030. The results provide a theoretical basis for monitoring crop growth with a multi-rotor UAV platform and explore a technical method for improving the precision of yield estimation.
Collapse
|
13
|
Improved Remote Sensing Image Classification Based on Multi-Scale Feature Fusion. REMOTE SENSING 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/rs12020213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
When extracting land-use information from remote sensing imagery using image segmentation, obtaining fine edges for extracted objects is a key problem that is yet to be solved. In this study, we developed a new weight feature value convolutional neural network (WFCNN) to perform fine remote sensing image segmentation and extract improved land-use information from remote sensing imagery. The WFCNN includes one encoder and one classifier. The encoder obtains a set of spectral features and five levels of semantic features. It uses the linear fusion method to hierarchically fuse the semantic features, employs an adjustment layer to optimize every level of fused features to ensure the stability of the pixel features, and combines the fused semantic and spectral features to form a feature graph. The classifier then uses a Softmax model to perform pixel-by-pixel classification. The WFCNN was trained using a stochastic gradient descent algorithm; the former and two variants were subject to experimental testing based on Gaofen 6 images and aerial images that compared them with the commonly used SegNet, U-NET, and RefineNet models. The accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-Score of the WFCNN were higher than those of the other models, indicating certain advantages in pixel-by-pixel segmentation. The results clearly show that the WFCNN can improve the accuracy and automation level of large-scale land-use mapping and the extraction of other information using remote sensing imagery.
Collapse
|
14
|
Combining Color Indices and Textures of UAV-Based Digital Imagery for Rice LAI Estimation. REMOTE SENSING 2019. [DOI: 10.3390/rs11151763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Leaf area index (LAI) is a fundamental indicator of plant growth status in agronomic and environmental studies. Due to rapid advances in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and sensor technologies, UAV-based remote sensing is emerging as a promising solution for monitoring crop LAI with great flexibility and applicability. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of combining color and texture information derived from UAV-based digital images for estimating LAI of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Rice field trials were conducted at two sites using different nitrogen application rates, varieties, and transplanting methods during 2016 to 2017. Digital images were collected using a consumer-grade UAV after sampling at key growth stages of tillering, stem elongation, panicle initiation and booting. Vegetation color indices (CIs) and grey level co-occurrence matrix-based textures were extracted from mosaicked UAV ortho-images for each plot. As a solution of using indices composed by two different textures, normalized difference texture indices (NDTIs) were calculated by two randomly selected textures. The relationships between rice LAIs and each calculated index were then compared using simple linear regression. Multivariate regression models with different input sets were further used to test the potential of combining CIs with various textures for rice LAI estimation. The results revealed that the visible atmospherically resistant index (VARI) based on three visible bands and the NDTI based on the mean textures derived from the red and green bands were the best for LAI retrieval in the CI and NDTI groups, respectively. Independent accuracy assessment showed that random forest (RF) exhibited the best predictive performance when combining CI and texture inputs (R2 = 0.84, RMSE = 0.87, MAE = 0.69). This study introduces a promising solution of combining color indices and textures from UAV-based digital imagery for rice LAI estimation. Future studies are needed on finding the best operation mode, suitable ground resolution, and optimal predictive methods for practical applications.
Collapse
|
15
|
Extracting Crop Spatial Distribution from Gaofen 2 Imagery Using a Convolutional Neural Network. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL 2019. [DOI: 10.3390/app9142917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Using satellite remote sensing has become a mainstream approach for extracting crop spatial distribution. Making edges finer is a challenge, while simultaneously extracting crop spatial distribution information from high-resolution remote sensing images using a convolutional neural network (CNN). Based on the characteristics of the crop area in the Gaofen 2 (GF-2) images, this paper proposes an improved CNN to extract fine crop areas. The CNN comprises a feature extractor and a classifier. The feature extractor employs a spectral feature extraction unit to generate spectral features, and five coding-decoding-pair units to generate five level features. A linear model is used to fuse features of different levels, and the fusion results are up-sampled to obtain a feature map consistent with the structure of the input image. This feature map is used by the classifier to perform pixel-by-pixel classification. In this study, the SegNet and RefineNet models and 21 GF-2 images of Feicheng County, Shandong Province, China, were chosen for comparison experiment. Our approach had an accuracy of 93.26%, which is higher than those of the existing SegNet (78.12%) and RefineNet (86.54%) models. This demonstrates the superiority of the proposed method in extracting crop spatial distribution information from GF-2 remote sensing images.
Collapse
|