1
|
Sanders JE, Vamos AC, Mertens JC, Allyn KJ, Larsen BG, Ballesteros D, Wang H, DeGrasse NS, Garbini JL, Hafner BJ, Friedly JL. An adaptive prosthetic socket for people with transtibial amputation. Sci Rep 2024; 14:11168. [PMID: 38750086 PMCID: PMC11096356 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61234-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
It is essential that people with limb amputation maintain proper prosthetic socket fit to prevent injury. Monitoring and adjusting socket fit, for example by removing the prosthesis to add prosthetic socks, is burdensome and can adversely affect users' function and quality-of-life. This study presents results from take-home testing of a motor-driven adaptive socket that automatically adjusted socket size during walking. A socket fit metric was calculated from inductive sensor measurements of the distance between the elastomeric liner surrounding the residual limb and the socket's inner surface. A proportional-integral controller was implemented to adjust socket size. When tested on 12 participants with transtibial amputation, the controller was active a mean of 68% of the walking time. In general, participants who walked more than 20 min/day demonstrated greater activity, less doff time, and fewer manual socket size adjustments for the adaptive socket compared with a locked non-adjustable socket and a motor-driven socket that participants adjusted with a smartphone application. Nine of 12 participants reported that they would use a motor-driven adjustable socket if it were available as it would limit their socket fit issues. The size and weight of the adaptive socket were considered the most important variables to improve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan E Sanders
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
| | - Andrew C Vamos
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Joseph C Mertens
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Katheryn J Allyn
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Brian G Larsen
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Daniel Ballesteros
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Horace Wang
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Nicholas S DeGrasse
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Ave NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Joseph L Garbini
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, 3900 E Stevens Way NE, Box 352600, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Brian J Hafner
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Box 356490, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Janna L Friedly
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Ave, Box 359612, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cullen S, Mackay R, Mohagheghi A, Du X. 3D Motion Analysis for the Assessment of Dynamic Coupling in Transtibial Prosthetics: A Proof of Concept. IEEE OPEN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2023; 4:141-147. [PMID: 38274781 PMCID: PMC10810304 DOI: 10.1109/ojemb.2023.3296978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Assessment of coupling between transtibial sockets and users is historically based on clinicians' observations and experience, but can be inaccurate and unreliable. Therefore, we present a proof of concept, for five out of six possible degrees of freedom coupling metric system for a socket, using motion analysis calibrated on a 3D printed limb substitute. The method is compatible with any socket suspension method and does not require prior modifications to the socket. Calibration trials were used to locate the axis of rotation of the knee joint referenced against a marker cluster on the thigh; this allowed for the identification of the limb during test trials despite the entire residuum being obscured from view by the socket. The error in the technique was found to be within 0.7 mm in displacement and 0.7 degrees in rotation, based on the control data. Dynamic testing showed the Inter Quartile Range (IQR) of inter time step variance was <0.5 mm/deg for all metrics. The method can form a basis for objective socket evaluation, improve clinical practice and the quality of life for amputees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Cullen
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, College of Engineering, Design and Physical SciencesBrunel University LondonUB8 3PHUxbridgeU.K.
| | - Ruth Mackay
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, College of Engineering, Design and Physical SciencesBrunel University LondonUB8 3PHUxbridgeU.K.
| | - Amir Mohagheghi
- Division of Sport, Health & Exercise Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Life SciencesBrunel University LondonUB8 3PHUxbridgeU.K.
| | - Xinli Du
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, College of Engineering, Design and Physical SciencesBrunel University LondonUB8 3PHUxbridgeU.K.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yang X, Zhao R, Solav D, Yang X, Lee DR, Sparrman B, Fan Y, Herr H. Material, design, and fabrication of custom prosthetic liners for lower-extremity amputees: A review. MEDICINE IN NOVEL TECHNOLOGY AND DEVICES 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.medntd.2022.100197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
|
4
|
Mertens JC, Brzostowski JT, Vamos A, Allyn KJ, Hafner BJ, Friedly JL, DeGrasse NS, Ballesteros D, Krout A, Larsen BG, Garbini JL, Sanders JE. A novel portable sensor to monitor bodily positions and activities in transtibial prosthesis users. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2022; 99:105741. [PMID: 36041309 PMCID: PMC10545288 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2022.105741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Step activity monitors provide insight into the amount of physical activity prosthesis users conduct but not how they use their prosthesis. The purpose of this research was to help fill this void by developing and testing a technology to monitor bodily position and type of activity. METHODS Thin inductive distance sensors were adhered to the insides of sockets of a small group of transtibial prosthesis users, two at proximal locations and two at distal locations. An in-lab structured protocol and a semi-structured out-of-lab protocol were video recorded, and then participants wore the sensing system for up to 7 days. A data processing algorithm was developed to identify sit, seated shift, stand, standing weight-shift, walk, partial doff, and non-use. Sensed distance data from the structured and semi-structured protocols were compared against the video data to characterize accuracy. Bodily positions and activities during take-home testing were tabulated to characterize participants' use of the prosthesis. FINDINGS Sit and walk detection accuracies were above 95% for all four participants tested. Stand detection accuracy was above 90% for three participants and 62.5% for one participant. The reduced accuracy may have been due to limited stand data from that participant. Step count was not proportional to active use time (sum of stand, walk, and standing weight-shift times). INTERPRETATION Step count may provide an incomplete picture of prosthesis use. Larger studies should be pursued to investigate how bodily position and type of activity may facilitate clinical decision-making and improve the lives of people with lower limb amputation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph C Mertens
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Jacob T Brzostowski
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Andrew Vamos
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Katheryn J Allyn
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Brian J Hafner
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Janna L Friedly
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Nicholas S DeGrasse
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Daniel Ballesteros
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Adam Krout
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Brian G Larsen
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Joseph L Garbini
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Joan E Sanders
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|