Nam HS, Han S, Leigh JH, Bang MS. Smartwatch-based functional assessment for upper extremity impairment after musculoskeletal injuries: A pilot study.
Hong Kong J Occup Ther 2024;
37:31-41. [PMID:
38912103 PMCID:
PMC11192429 DOI:
10.1177/15691861241241775]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction
Wearable sensors are increasingly applied to rehabilitation for arm movement analysis. However, simple and clinically relevant applications are scarce.
Objectives
To investigate the feasibility of single smart watch-based parameters for functional assessment in upper limb rehabilitation for musculoskeletal injuries using a commercial smart watch.
Method
Ten patients with unilateral shoulder pain and range-of-motion limitations were enrolled. They wore Galaxy Watch® and performed three sets of upper extremity tasks consisting of gross activities-of-daily-living tasks, Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), and Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI), and the acceleration and angular velocities were acquired. The motion segment size (MSS), representing motion smoothness from a clinical perspective, and various sensor-based parameters were extracted. The correlation between the parameters and clinical outcome measures were analyzed. The percent relative range (PRR) of the significant parameters was also calculated.
Results
For overhead and behind body activity task set, mean MSS for elbow flexion/extension axis significantly correlated with WMFT score (R = 0.784, p = .012). For planar tasks, mean MSS for the forearm supination/pronation (R = 0.815, p = .007) and shoulder rotation (R = 0.870, p = .002) axes significantly correlated with WMFT score. For forearm and fine movement task set, mean MSS of the elbow flexion/extension angle showed significant correlation with WMFT (R = 0.880, p < .001) and UEFI (R = 0.718, p = .019). The total performance time (R = -0.741, p = .014) also showed significant correlation with WMFT score. The PRR for mean MSS in forearm supination (71.5%, planar tasks) and mean MSS in x-direction (49.8%, forearm and fine motor movements) were similar to the PRR of WMFT (58.5%), suggesting sufficient variation range across different degree of impairments.
Conclusion
The commercial smart watch-based parameters showed consistent potential for use in clinical functional assessments.
Collapse