Detection of Dental Apical Lesions Using CNNs on Periapical Radiograph

Artificial intelligence for detecting periapical radiolucencies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Dentists' diagnostic accuracy in detecting periapical radiolucency varies considerably. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) for detecting periapical radiolucency.

DATA

Studies reporting diagnostic accuracy and utilizing AI for periapical radiolucency detection, published until November 2023, were eligible for inclusion. Meta-analysis was conducted using the online MetaDTA Tool to calculate pooled sensitivity and specificity. Risk of bias was evaluated using QUADAS-2.

SOURCES

A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Xplore databases. Studies reporting diagnostic accuracy and utilizing AI tools for periapical radiolucency detection, published until November 2023, were eligible for inclusion.

STUDY SELECTION

We identified 210 articles, of which 24 met the criteria for inclusion in the review. All but one study used one type of convolutional neural network. The body of evidence comes with an overall unclear to high risk of bias and several applicability concerns. Four of the twenty-four studies were included in a meta-analysis. AI showed a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.94 (95 % CI = 0.90-0.96) and 0.96 (95 % CI = 0.91-0.98), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

AI demonstrated high specificity and sensitivity for detecting periapical radiolucencies. However, the current landscape suggests a need for diverse study designs beyond traditional diagnostic accuracy studies. Prospective real-life randomized controlled trials using heterogeneous data are needed to demonstrate the true value of AI.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Artificial intelligence tools seem to have the potential to support detecting periapical radiolucencies on imagery. Notably, nearly all studies did not test fully fledged software systems but measured the mere accuracy of AI models in diagnostic accuracy studies. The true value of currently available AI-based software for lesion detection on both 2D and 3D radiographs remains uncertain.

State-of-art technologies, challenges, and emerging trends of computer vision in dental images

Computer vision falls under the broad umbrella of artificial intelligence that mimics human vision and plays a vital role in dental imaging. Dental practitioners visualize and interpret teeth, and the structure surrounding the teeth and detect abnormalities by manually examining various dental imaging modalities. Due to the complexity and cognitive difficulty of comprehending medical data, human error makes correct diagnosis difficult. Automated diagnosis may be able to help alleviate delays, hasten practitioners' interpretation of positive cases, and lighten their workload. Several medical imaging modalities like X-rays, CT scans, color images, etc. that are employed in dentistry are briefly described in this survey. Dentists employ dental imaging as a diagnostic tool in several specialties, including orthodontics, endodontics, periodontics, etc. In the discipline of dentistry, computer vision has progressed from classic image processing to machine learning with mathematical approaches and robust deep learning techniques. Here conventional image processing techniques solely as well as in conjunction with intelligent machine learning algorithms, and sophisticated architectures of dental radiograph analysis employ deep learning techniques. This study provides a detailed summary of several tasks, including anatomical segmentation, identification, and categorization of different dental anomalies with their shortfalls as well as future perspectives in this field.

An Automatic Grading System for Orthodontically Induced External Root Resorption Based on Deep Convolutional Neural Network

Orthodontically induced external root resorption (OIERR) is a common complication of orthodontic treatments. Accurate OIERR grading is crucial for clinical intervention. This study aimed to evaluate six deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for performing OIERR grading on tooth slices to construct an automatic grading system for OIERR. A total of 2146 tooth slices of different OIERR grades were collected and preprocessed. Six pre-trained CNNs (EfficientNet-B1, EfficientNet-B2, EfficientNet-B3, EfficientNet-B4, EfficientNet-B5, and MobileNet-V3) were trained and validated on the pre-processed images based on four different cross-validation methods. The performances of the CNNs on a test set were evaluated and compared with those of orthodontists. The gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) technique was used to explore the area of maximum impact on the model decisions in the tooth slices. The six CNN models performed remarkably well in OIERR grading, with a mean accuracy of 0.92, surpassing that of the orthodontists (mean accuracy of 0.82). EfficientNet-B4 trained with fivefold cross-validation emerged as the final OIERR grading system, with a high accuracy of 0.94. Grad-CAM revealed that the apical region had the greatest effect on the OIERR grading system. The six CNNs demonstrated excellent OIERR grading and outperformed orthodontists. The proposed OIERR grading system holds potential as a reliable diagnostic support for orthodontists in clinical practice.

Artificial intelligence and radiomics in the diagnosis of intraosseous lesions of the gnathic bones: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this systematic review (SR) is to gather evidence on the use of machine learning (ML) models in the diagnosis of intraosseous lesions in gnathic bones and to analyze the reliability, impact, and usefulness of such models. This SR was performed in accordance with the PRISMA 2022 guidelines and was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022379298).

METHODS

The acronym PICOS was used to structure the inquiry-focused review question "Is Artificial Intelligence reliable for the diagnosis of intraosseous lesions in gnathic bones?" The literature search was conducted in various electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Lilacs, IEEE Xplore, and Gray Literature (Google Scholar and ProQuest). Risk of bias assessment was performed using PROBAST, and the results were synthesized by considering the task and sampling strategy of the dataset.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies were included (21 146 radiographic images). Ameloblastomas, odontogenic keratocysts, dentigerous cysts, and periapical cysts were the most frequently investigated lesions. According to TRIPOD, most studies were classified as type 2 (randomly divided). The F1 score was presented in only 13 studies, which provided the metrics for 20 trials, with a mean of 0.71 (±0.25).

CONCLUSION

There is no conclusive evidence to support the usefulness of ML-based models in the detection, segmentation, and classification of intraosseous lesions in gnathic bones for routine clinical application. The lack of detail about data sampling, the lack of a comprehensive set of metrics for training and validation, and the absence of external testing limit experiments and hinder proper evaluation of model performance.

Artificial intelligence in endodontics: Data preparation, clinical applications, ethical considerations, limitations, and future directions

Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a transformative technology in healthcare, including endodontics. A gap in knowledge exists in understanding AI's applications and limitations among endodontic experts. This comprehensive review aims to (A) elaborate on technical and ethical aspects of using data to implement AI models in endodontics; (B) elaborate on evaluation metrics; (C) review the current applications of AI in endodontics; and (D) review the limitations and barriers to real-world implementation of AI in the field of endodontics and its future potentials/directions. The article shows that AI techniques have been applied in endodontics for critical tasks such as detection of radiolucent lesions, analysis of root canal morphology, prediction of treatment outcome and post-operative pain and more. Deep learning models like convolutional neural networks demonstrate high accuracy in these applications. However, challenges remain regarding model interpretability, generalizability, and adoption into clinical practice. When thoughtfully implemented, AI has great potential to aid with diagnostics, treatment planning, clinical interventions, and education in the field of endodontics. However, concerted efforts are still needed to address limitations and to facilitate integration into clinical workflows.

Artificial intelligence in endodontics: Fundamental principles, workflow, and tasks

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare has seen significant advancements, particularly in areas requiring image interpretation. Endodontics, a specialty within dentistry, stands to benefit immensely from AI applications, especially in interpreting radiographic images. However, there is a knowledge gap among endodontists regarding the fundamentals of machine learning and deep learning, hindering the full utilization of AI in this field. This narrative review aims to: (A) elaborate on the basic principles of machine learning and deep learning and present the basics of neural network architectures; (B) explain the workflow for developing AI solutions, from data collection through clinical integration; (C) discuss specific AI tasks and applications relevant to endodontic diagnosis and treatment. The article shows that AI offers diverse practical applications in endodontics. Computer vision methods help analyse images while natural language processing extracts insights from text. With robust validation, these techniques can enhance diagnosis, treatment planning, education, and patient care. In conclusion, AI holds significant potential to benefit endodontic research, practice, and education. Successful integration requires an evolving partnership between clinicians, computer scientists, and industry.

DeMambaNet: Deformable Convolution and Mamba Integration Network for High-Precision Segmentation of Ambiguously Defined Dental Radicular Boundaries

The incorporation of automatic segmentation methodologies into dental X-ray images refined the paradigms of clinical diagnostics and therapeutic planning by facilitating meticulous, pixel-level articulation of both dental structures and proximate tissues. This underpins the pillars of early pathological detection and meticulous disease progression monitoring. Nonetheless, conventional segmentation frameworks often encounter significant setbacks attributable to the intrinsic limitations of X-ray imaging, including compromised image fidelity, obscured delineation of structural boundaries, and the intricate anatomical structures of dental constituents such as pulp, enamel, and dentin. To surmount these impediments, we propose the Deformable Convolution and Mamba Integration Network, an innovative 2D dental X-ray image segmentation architecture, which amalgamates a Coalescent Structural Deformable Encoder, a Cognitively-Optimized Semantic Enhance Module, and a Hierarchical Convergence Decoder. Collectively, these components bolster the management of multi-scale global features, fortify the stability of feature representation, and refine the amalgamation of feature vectors. A comparative assessment against 14 baselines underscores its efficacy, registering a 0.95% enhancement in the Dice Coefficient and a diminution of the 95th percentile Hausdorff Distance to 7.494.

Comparing the accuracy of two machine learning models in detection and classification of periapical lesions using periapical radiographs

BACKGROUND

Previous deep learning-based studies were mainly conducted on detecting periapical lesions; limited information in classification, such as the periapical index (PAI) scoring system, is available. The study aimed to apply two deep learning models, Faster R-CNN and YOLOv4, in detecting and classifying periapical lesions using the PAI score from periapical radiographs (PR) in three different regions of the dental arch: anterior teeth, premolars, and molars.

METHODS

Out of 2658 PR selected for the study, 2122 PR were used for training, 268 PR were used for validation and 268 PR were used for testing. The diagnosis made by experienced dentists was used as the reference diagnosis.

RESULTS

The Faster R-CNN and YOLOv4 models obtained great sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and precision for detecting periapical lesions. No clear difference in the performance of both models among these three regions was found. The true prediction of Faster R-CNN was 89%, 83.01% and 91.84% for PAI 3, PAI 4 and PAI 5 lesions, respectively. The corresponding values of YOLOv4 were 68.06%, 50.94%, and 65.31%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated the potential of YOLOv4 and Faster R-CNN models for detecting and classifying periapical lesions based on the PAI scoring system using periapical radiographs.

The role of deep learning for periapical lesion detection on panoramic radiographs

OBJECTIVE

This work aimed to detect automatically periapical lesion on panoramic radiographs (PRs) using deep learning.

METHODS

454 objects in 357 PRs were anonymized and manually labeled. They are then pre-processed to improve image quality and enhancement purposes. The data were randomly assigned into the training, validation, and test folders with ratios of 0.8, 0.1, and 0.1, respectively. The state-of-art 10 different deep learning-based detection frameworks including various backbones were applied to periapical lesion detection problem. Model performances were evaluated by mean average precision, accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, precision-recall curves, area under curve and several other Common Objects in Context detection evaluation metrics.

RESULTS

Deep learning-based detection frameworks were generally successful in detecting periapical lesions on PRs. Detection performance, mean average precision, varied between 0.832 and 0.953 while accuracy was between 0.673 and 0.812 for all models. F1 score was between 0.8 and 0.895. RetinaNet performed the best detection performance, similarly Adaptive Training Sample Selection provided F1 score of 0.895 as highest value. Testing with external data supported our findings.

CONCLUSION

This work showed that deep learning models can reliably detect periapical lesions on PRs. Artificial intelligence-based on deep learning tools are revolutionizing dental healthcare and can help both clinicians and dental healthcare system.

Deep Learning in Diagnosis of Dental Anomalies and Diseases: A Systematic Review

Deep learning and diagnostic applications in oral and dental health have received significant attention recently. In this review, studies applying deep learning to diagnose anomalies and diseases in dental image material were systematically compiled, and their datasets, methodologies, test processes, explainable artificial intelligence methods, and findings were analyzed. Tests and results in studies involving human-artificial intelligence comparisons are discussed in detail to draw attention to the clinical importance of deep learning. In addition, the review critically evaluates the literature to guide and further develop future studies in this field. An extensive literature search was conducted for the 2019-May 2023 range using the Medline (PubMed) and Google Scholar databases to identify eligible articles, and 101 studies were shortlisted, including applications for diagnosing dental anomalies (n = 22) and diseases (n = 79) using deep learning for classification, object detection, and segmentation tasks. According to the results, the most commonly used task type was classification (n = 51), the most commonly used dental image material was panoramic radiographs (n = 55), and the most frequently used performance metric was sensitivity/recall/true positive rate (n = 87) and accuracy (n = 69). Dataset sizes ranged from 60 to 12,179 images. Although deep learning algorithms are used as individual or at least individualized architectures, standardized architectures such as pre-trained CNNs, Faster R-CNN, YOLO, and U-Net have been used in most studies. Few studies have used the explainable AI method (n = 22) and applied tests comparing human and artificial intelligence (n = 21). Deep learning is promising for better diagnosis and treatment planning in dentistry based on the high-performance results reported by the studies. For all that, their safety should be demonstrated using a more reproducible and comparable methodology, including tests with information about their clinical applicability, by defining a standard set of tests and performance metrics.

Deep Learning for Dental Diagnosis: A Novel Approach to Furcation Involvement Detection on Periapical Radiographs

Furcation defects pose a significant challenge in the diagnosis and treatment planning of periodontal diseases. The accurate detection of furcation involvements (FI) on periapical radiographs (PAs) is crucial for the success of periodontal therapy. This research proposes a deep learning-based approach to furcation defect detection using convolutional neural networks (CNN) with an accuracy rate of 95%. This research has undergone a rigorous review by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and has received accreditation under number 202002030B0C505. A dataset of 300 periapical radiographs of teeth with and without FI were collected and preprocessed to enhance the quality of the images. The efficient and innovative image masking technique used in this research better enhances the contrast between FI symptoms and other areas. Moreover, this technology highlights the region of interest (ROI) for the subsequent CNN models training with a combination of transfer learning and fine-tuning techniques. The proposed segmentation algorithm demonstrates exceptional performance with an overall accuracy up to 94.97%, surpassing other conventional methods. Moreover, in comparison with existing CNN technology for identifying dental problems, this research proposes an improved adaptive threshold preprocessing technique that produces clearer distinctions between teeth and interdental molars. The proposed model achieves impressive results in detecting FI with identification rates ranging from 92.96% to a remarkable 94.97%. These findings suggest that our deep learning approach holds significant potential for improving the accuracy and efficiency of dental diagnosis. Such AI-assisted dental diagnosis has the potential to improve periodontal diagnosis, treatment planning, and patient outcomes. This research demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of using deep learning algorithms for furcation defect detection on periapical radiographs and highlights the potential for AI-assisted dental diagnosis. With the improvement of dental abnormality detection, earlier intervention could be enabled and could ultimately lead to improved patient outcomes.

A Comprehensive Review of Recent Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Dentistry E-Health

Artificial intelligence has made substantial progress in medicine. Automated dental imaging interpretation is one of the most prolific areas of research using AI. X-ray and infrared imaging systems have enabled dental clinicians to identify dental diseases since the 1950s. However, the manual process of dental disease assessment is tedious and error-prone when diagnosed by inexperienced dentists. Thus, researchers have employed different advanced computer vision techniques, and machine- and deep-learning models for dental disease diagnoses using X-ray and near-infrared imagery. Despite the notable development of AI in dentistry, certain factors affect the performance of the proposed approaches, including limited data availability, imbalanced classes, and lack of transparency and interpretability. Hence, it is of utmost importance for the research community to formulate suitable approaches, considering the existing challenges and leveraging findings from the existing studies. Based on an extensive literature review, this survey provides a brief overview of X-ray and near-infrared imaging systems. Additionally, a comprehensive insight into challenges faced by researchers in the dental domain has been brought forth in this survey. The article further offers an amalgamative assessment of both performances and methods evaluated on public benchmarks and concludes with ethical considerations and future research avenues.

Improving Dental Implant Outcomes: CNN-Based System Accurately Measures Degree of Peri-Implantitis Damage on Periapical Film

As the popularity of dental implants continues to grow at a rate of about 14% per year, so do the risks associated with the procedure. Complications such as sinusitis and nerve damage are not uncommon, and inadequate cleaning can lead to peri-implantitis around the implant, jeopardizing its stability and potentially necessitating retreatment. To address this issue, this research proposes a new system for evaluating the degree of periodontal damage around implants using Periapical film (PA). The system utilizes two Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) models to accurately detect the location of the implant and assess the extent of damage caused by peri-implantitis. One of the CNN models is designed to determine the location of the implant in the PA with an accuracy of up to 89.31%, while the other model is responsible for assessing the degree of Peri-implantitis damage around the implant, achieving an accuracy of 90.45%. The system combines image cropping based on position information obtained from the first CNN with image enhancement techniques such as Histogram Equalization and Adaptive Histogram Equalization (AHE) to improve the visibility of the implant and gums. The result is a more accurate assessment of whether peri-implantitis has eroded to the first thread, a critical indicator of implant stability. To ensure the ethical and regulatory standards of our research, this proposal has been certified by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) under number 202102023B0C503. With no existing technology to evaluate Peri-implantitis damage around dental implants, this CNN-based system has the potential to revolutionize implant dentistry and improve patient outcomes.

Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence in Detecting Periapical Periodontitis on Two-Dimensional Radiographs: A Retrospective Study and Literature Review

This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence in detecting apical pathosis on periapical radiographs. A total of twenty anonymized periapical radiographs were retrieved from the database of Poznan University of Medical Sciences. These radiographs displayed a sequence of 60 visible teeth. The evaluation of the radiographs was conducted using two methods (manual and automatic), and the results obtained from each technique were afterward compared. For the ground-truth method, one oral and maxillofacial radiology expert with more than ten years of experience and one trainee in oral and maxillofacial radiology evaluated the radiographs by classifying teeth as healthy and unhealthy. A tooth was considered unhealthy when periapical periodontitis related to this tooth had been detected on the radiograph. At the same time, a tooth was classified as healthy when no periapical radiolucency was detected on the periapical radiographs. Then, the same radiographs were evaluated by artificial intelligence, Diagnocat (Diagnocat Ltd., San Francisco, CA, USA). Diagnocat (Diagnocat Ltd., San Francisco, CA, USA) correctly identified periapical lesions on periapical radiographs with a sensitivity of 92.30% and identified healthy teeth with a specificity of 97.87%. The recorded accuracy and F1 score were 96.66% and 0.92, respectively. The artificial intelligence algorithm misdiagnosed one unhealthy tooth (false negative) and over-diagnosed one healthy tooth (false positive) compared to the ground-truth results. Diagnocat (Diagnocat Ltd., San Francisco, CA, USA) showed an optimum accuracy for detecting periapical periodontitis on periapical radiographs. However, more research is needed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence-based algorithms in dentistry.

Deep Learning for Detection of Periapical Radiolucent Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the overall accuracy of deep learning models in detecting periapical (PA) radiolucent lesions in dental radiographs, when compared to expert clinicians.

METHODS

Electronic databases of Medline (via PubMed), Embase (via Ovid), Scopus, Google Scholar, and arXiv were searched. Quality of eligible studies was assessed by using Quality Assessment and Diagnostic Accuracy Tool-2. Quantitative analyses were conducted using hierarchical logistic regression for meta-analyses on diagnostic accuracy. Subgroup analyses on different image modalities (PA radiographs, panoramic radiographs, and cone beam computed tomographic images) and on different deep learning tasks (classification, segmentation, object detection) were conducted. Certainty of evidence was assessed by using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system.

RESULTS

A total of 932 studies were screened. Eighteen studies were included in the systematic review, out of which 6 studies were selected for quantitative analyses. Six studies had low risk of bias. Twelve studies had risk of bias. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio of included studies (all image modalities; all tasks) were 0.925 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.862-0.960), 0.852 (95% CI, 0.810-0.885), 6.261 (95% CI, 4.717-8.311), 0.087 (95% CI, 0.045-0.168), and 71.692 (95% CI, 29.957-171.565), respectively. No publication bias was detected (Egger's test, P = .82). Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluationshowed a "high" certainty of evidence for the studies included in the meta-analyses.

CONCLUSION

Compared to expert clinicians, deep learning showed highly accurate results in detecting PA radiolucent lesions in dental radiographs. Most studies had risk of bias. There was a lack of prospective studies.

Developments and Performance of Artificial Intelligence Models Designed for Application in Endodontics: A Systematic Review

Technological advancements in health sciences have led to enormous developments in artificial intelligence (AI) models designed for application in health sectors. This article aimed at reporting on the application and performances of AI models that have been designed for application in endodontics. Renowned online databases, primarily PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane and secondarily Google Scholar and the Saudi Digital Library, were accessed for articles relevant to the research question that were published from 1 January 2000 to 30 November 2022. In the last 5 years, there has been a significant increase in the number of articles reporting on AI models applied for endodontics. AI models have been developed for determining working length, vertical root fractures, root canal failures, root morphology, and thrust force and torque in canal preparation; detecting pulpal diseases; detecting and diagnosing periapical lesions; predicting postoperative pain, curative effect after treatment, and case difficulty; and segmenting pulp cavities. Most of the included studies (n = 21) were developed using convolutional neural networks. Among the included studies. datasets that were used were mostly cone-beam computed tomography images, followed by periapical radiographs and panoramic radiographs. Thirty-seven original research articles that fulfilled the eligibility criteria were critically assessed in accordance with QUADAS-2 guidelines, which revealed a low risk of bias in the patient selection domain in most of the studies (risk of bias: 90%; applicability: 70%). The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. These models can be used as supplementary tools in clinical practice in order to expedite the clinical decision-making process and enhance the treatment modality and clinical operation.

A High-Accuracy Detection System: Based on Transfer Learning for Apical Lesions on Periapical Radiograph

Apical Lesions, one of the most common oral diseases, can be effectively detected in daily dental examinations by a periapical radiograph (PA). In the current popular endodontic treatment, most dentists spend a lot of time manually marking the lesion area. In order to reduce the burden on dentists, this paper proposes a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based regional analysis model for spical lesions for periapical radiographs. In this study, the database was provided by dentists with more than three years of practical experience, meeting the criteria for clinical practical application. The contributions of this work are (1) an advanced adaptive threshold preprocessing technique for image segmentation, which can achieve an accuracy rate of more than 96%; (2) a better and more intuitive apical lesions symptom enhancement technique; and (3) a model for apical lesions detection with an accuracy as high as 96.21%. Compared with existing state-of-the-art technology, the proposed model has improved the accuracy by more than 5%. The proposed model has successfully improved the automatic diagnosis of apical lesions. With the help of automation, dentists can focus more on technical and medical diagnoses, such as treatment, tooth cleaning, or medical communication. This proposal has been certified by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) with the certification number 202002030B0.

Where Is the Artificial Intelligence Applied in Dentistry? Systematic Review and Literature Analysis

This literature research had two main objectives. The first objective was to quantify how frequently artificial intelligence (AI) was utilized in dental literature from 2011 until 2021. The second objective was to distinguish the focus of such publications; in particular, dental field and topic. The main inclusion criterium was an original article or review in English focused on dental utilization of AI. All other types of publications or non-dental or non-AI-focused were excluded. The information sources were Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, queried on 19 April 2022. The search string was “artificial intelligence” AND (dental OR dentistry OR tooth OR teeth OR dentofacial OR maxillofacial OR orofacial OR orthodontics OR endodontics OR periodontics OR prosthodontics). Following the removal of duplicates, all remaining publications were returned by searches and were screened by three independent operators to minimize the risk of bias. The analysis of 2011–2021 publications identified 4413 records, from which 1497 were finally selected and calculated according to the year of publication. The results confirmed a historically unprecedented boom in AI dental publications, with an average increase of 21.6% per year over the last decade and a 34.9% increase per year over the last 5 years. In the achievement of the second objective, qualitative assessment of dental AI publications since 2021 identified 1717 records, with 497 papers finally selected. The results of this assessment indicated the relative proportions of focal topics, as follows: radiology 26.36%, orthodontics 18.31%, general scope 17.10%, restorative 12.09%, surgery 11.87% and education 5.63%. The review confirms that the current use of artificial intelligence in dentistry is concentrated mainly around the evaluation of digital diagnostic methods, especially radiology; however, its implementation is expected to gradually penetrate all parts of the profession.

Integrating Image Analysis and Dental Radiography for Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diagnosis

The recent change in classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases includes objective evaluation of intra-oral radiographs and quantification of bone loss for disease staging and grading. Assessment of the progression of periodontal disease requires deduction of bone loss longitudinally, and its interpretation as (1) a percentage in relation to tooth root and (2) as a function of the patient's age. Similarly, bone loss around dental implants, after accounting for initial remodeling, is central for determining diagnosis, severity, and progression of peri-implantitis. Bone gain secondary to periodontal regeneration can be measured using standardized dental radiographs and compared to baseline morphology to determine treatment success. Computational image analysis, including machine learning (ML), has the potential to develop and automate quantitative measures of tooth, implant, bone volumes, and predict disease progression. The developed algorithms need to be standardized while considering pre-analytic, analytic, and post-analytic factors for successful translation to clinic. This review will introduce image analysis and machine learning in the context of dental radiography, and expand on the potential for integration of image analysis for assisted diagnosis of periodontitis and peri-implantitis.