Objective Measurement of Walking Activity Using Wearable Technologies in People with Parkinson Disease: A Systematic Review

Remote at-home wearable-based gait assessments in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy compared to Parkinson's Disease

BACKGROUND

Wearable sensors can differentiate Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) from Parkinson's Disease (PD) in laboratory settings but have not been tested in remote settings.

OBJECTIVES

To compare gait and balance in PSP and PD remotely using wearable-based assessments.

METHODS

Participants with probable PSP or probable/clinically established PD with reliable caregivers, still able to ambulate 10 feet unassisted, were recruited, enrolled, and consented remotely and instructed by video conference to operate a study-specific tablet solution (BioDigit Home ™) and to wear three inertial sensors (LEGSys™, BioSensics LLC, Newton, MA USA) while performing the Timed Up and Go, 5 × sit-to-stand, and 2-min walk tests. PSPRS and MDS-UPDRS scores were collected virtually or during routine clinical visits.

RESULTS

Between November, 2021- November, 2022, 27 participants were screened of whom 3 were excluded because of technological difficulties. Eleven PSP and 12 PD participants enrolled, of whom 10 from each group had complete analyzable data. Demographics were well-matched (PSP mean age = 67.6 ± 1.3 years, 40% female; PD mean age = 70.3 ± 1.8 years, 40% female) while disease duration was significantly shorter in PSP (PSP 14 ± 3.5 months vs PD 87.9 ± 16.9 months). Gait parameters showed significant group differences with effect sizes ranging from d = 1.0 to 2.27. Gait speed was significantly slower in PSP: 0.45 ± 0.06 m/s vs. 0.79 ± 0.06 m/s in PD (d = 1.78, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates the feasibility of measuring gait in PSP and PD remotely using wearable sensors. The study provides insight into digital biomarkers for both neurodegenerative diseases.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04753320, first posted Febuary 15, 2021.

Four Days Are Enough to Provide a Reliable Daily Step Count in Mild to Moderate Parkinson's Disease through a Commercial Smartwatch

Daily steps could be a valuable indicator of real-world ambulation in Parkinson's disease (PD). Nonetheless, no study to date has investigated the minimum number of days required to reliably estimate the average daily steps through commercial smartwatches in people with PD. Fifty-six patients were monitored through a commercial smartwatch for 5 consecutive days. The total daily steps for each day was recorded and the average daily steps was calculated as well as the working and weekend days average steps. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (3,k), standard error of measurement (SEM), Bland-Altman statistics, and minimum detectable change (MDC) were used to evaluate the reliability of the step count for every combination of 2-5 days. The threshold for acceptability was set at an ICC ≥ 0.8 with a lower bound of CI 95% ≥ 0.75 and a SAM < 10%. ANOVA and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare steps across the days and between the working and weekend days, respectively. Four days were needed to achieve an acceptable reliability (ICC range: 0.84-0.90; SAM range: 7.8-9.4%). In addition, daily steps did not significantly differ across the days and between the working and weekend days. These findings could support the use of step count as a walking activity index and could be relevant to developing monitoring, preventive, and rehabilitation strategies for people with PD.