Visual Cues for Turning in Parkinson's Disease

The Efficacy of Wearable Cueing Devices on Gait and Motor Function in Parkinson Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the efficacy of wearable cueing devices for improving gait and motor function of patients with Parkinson disease (PWP).

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched for papers published in English, from inception to October 23, 2022.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials focusing on the effects of wearable cueing devices on gait and motor function in PWP were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently selected articles and extracted the data. The Cochrane Bias Risk Assessment Tool was used to assess risk of bias and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was used to evaluate the quality of evidence.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Seven randomized controlled trials with 167 PWP were included in the meta-analysis. Significant effect of wearable cueing devices on walking speed (mean difference [MD]=0.07 m/s, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.05, 0.09], P<.00001) was detected; however, after sensitivity analysis, no significant overall effect on walking speed was noted (MD=0.04 m/s, 95% CI: [-0.03, 0.12], P=.25). No significant improvements were found in stride length (MD=0.06 m, 95% CI: [0.00, 0.13], P=.05), the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-III score (MD=-0.61, 95% CI: [-4.10, 2.88], P=.73), Freezing of Gait Questionnaire score (MD=-0.83, 95% CI: [-2.98, 1.33], P=.45), or double support time (MD=-0.91, 95% CI: [-3.09, 1.26], P=.41). Evidence was evaluated as low quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Wearable cueing devices may result in an immediate improvement on walking speed; however, there is no evidence that their use results in a significant improvement in other gait or motor functions.

Visual Exploration While Walking With and Without Visual Cues in Parkinson's Disease: Freezer Versus Non-Freezer

BACKGROUND

Visual cues can improve gait in Parkinson's disease (PD), including those experiencing freezing of gait (FOG). However, responses are variable and underpinning mechanisms remain unclear. Visuo-cognitive processing (measured through visual exploration) has been implicated in cue response, but this has not been comprehensively examined.

OBJECTIVE

To examine visual exploration and gait with and without visual cues in PD who do and do not self-report FOG, and healthy controls (HC).

METHODS

17 HC, 21 PD without FOG, and 22 PD with FOG walked with and without visual cues, under single and dual-task conditions. Visual exploration (ie, saccade frequency, duration, peak velocity, amplitude, and fixation duration) was measured via mobile eye-tracking and gait (ie, gait speed, stride length, foot strike angle, stride time, and stride time variability) with inertial sensors.

RESULTS

PD had impaired gait compared to HC, and dual-tasking made gait variables worse across groups (all P < .01). Visual cues improved stride length, foot strike angle, and stride time in all groups (P < .01). Visual cueing also increased saccade frequency, but reduced saccade peak velocity and amplitude in all groups (P < .01). Gait improvement related to changes in visual exploration with visual cues in PD but not HC, with relationships dependent on group (FOG vs non-FOG) and task (single vs dual).

CONCLUSION

Visual cues improved visual exploration and gait outcomes in HC and PD, with similar responses in freezers and non-freezers. Freezer and non-freezer specific associations between cue-related changes in visual exploration and gait indicate different underlying visuo-cognitive processing within these subgroups for cue response.

One cue does not fit all: a systematic review with meta-analysis of the effectiveness of cueing on freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease

The difficulty in assessing FOG and the variety of existing cues, hamper to determine which cueing modality should be applied and which FOG-related aspect should be targeted to reach personalized treatments for FOG. This systematic review aimed to highlight: i) whether cues could reduce FOG and improve FOG-related gait parameters, ii) which cues are the most effective, iii) whether medication state (ON-OFF) affects cues-related results. Thirty-three repeated measure design studies assessing cueing effectiveness were included and subdivided according to gait tasks (gait initiation, walking, turning) and to the medication state. Main results reveal that: preparatory phase of gait initiation benefit from visual and auditory cues; spatio-temporal parameters (e.g., step and stride length) and are improved by visual cues during walking; turning time and step time variability are reduced by applying auditory and visual cues. Some findings on the potential benefits of cueing on FOG and FOG gait-related parameters were found. Questions remain about which are the best behavioral strategies according to FOG features and PD clinical characteristics.